- Joined
- 22 May 2008
- Posts
- 758
- Reactions
- 0
Re: Octaviar MFS Premium Income Fund PIF
Just had a look through th PIF annual report for year to 30 June 2007:
MFS IM paid itself $16Million ($7.7M in 2006 , $4.8M in 2005)
Perpetual was paid $1.27Million
Auditor got $45K
Other costs $897K.
The juicy stuff is at the end in the 'Notes on Financial Statements:'
page 45 - '11 Financial Assets held at fair value through profit or loss' - RELATED entities $37M (i.e 12.5% of the $297M total of this category of assets)
Page 52: 136M units in the PIF were owned by related parties (@ 30 Jun 07)
MFS WholesalePIF owned 75M(61M @30/6/06, 32M @30/6/05, 0M? @30/6/04)
MFS Administration Pty Ltd owned 60M (0M? in 2005)
I can't wait to see the 2008 report to see if THEY got their redemptions before the door was closed on the rest of us.
Were these two entities invented to keep buying PIF units?
Page 53/53:
PIF had $99M invested in/loans to related parties at 30/6/07. ($74M @30/6/06. $137M @30/6/05) Attached is a spreadsheet of collated data on related party transactions for the last 3 annual reports.
I want to know how far the definition of 'related parties' extends. Did PIF invest in/loan to 'unrelated' parties that had substantial holdings in 'related parties.
Can anyone tell me why on page 54 (17 Related Party Transactions (cont)) there are BLANKS (neither a dash or number) for:
Particularly for MFS Property Trust No 7 - received/receivable 2007: BLANK.
How can PWC have signed off on an annual report that had blanks? For such an important document??? What else was blank after they signed off but was subsequently filled in?
Just had a look through th PIF annual report for year to 30 June 2007:
MFS IM paid itself $16Million ($7.7M in 2006 , $4.8M in 2005)
Perpetual was paid $1.27Million
Auditor got $45K
Other costs $897K.
The juicy stuff is at the end in the 'Notes on Financial Statements:'
page 45 - '11 Financial Assets held at fair value through profit or loss' - RELATED entities $37M (i.e 12.5% of the $297M total of this category of assets)
Page 52: 136M units in the PIF were owned by related parties (@ 30 Jun 07)
MFS WholesalePIF owned 75M(61M @30/6/06, 32M @30/6/05, 0M? @30/6/04)
MFS Administration Pty Ltd owned 60M (0M? in 2005)
I can't wait to see the 2008 report to see if THEY got their redemptions before the door was closed on the rest of us.
Were these two entities invented to keep buying PIF units?
Page 53/53:
PIF had $99M invested in/loans to related parties at 30/6/07. ($74M @30/6/06. $137M @30/6/05) Attached is a spreadsheet of collated data on related party transactions for the last 3 annual reports.
I want to know how far the definition of 'related parties' extends. Did PIF invest in/loan to 'unrelated' parties that had substantial holdings in 'related parties.
Can anyone tell me why on page 54 (17 Related Party Transactions (cont)) there are BLANKS (neither a dash or number) for:
Particularly for MFS Property Trust No 7 - received/receivable 2007: BLANK.
How can PWC have signed off on an annual report that had blanks? For such an important document??? What else was blank after they signed off but was subsequently filled in?