Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,018
- Reactions
- 11,006
When was the last time a major power ‘mobilized’ for war? I’m not sure if Korea or Vietnam were mobilizations? Might be WW2…
Interesting he's not playing the 'long game' .... maybe Europe will get through winter? Maybe he's underestimated the blowback. (genocidalists usually do)When was the last time a major power ‘mobilized’ for war? I’m not sure if Korea or Vietnam were mobilizations? Might be WW2…
This is a big call by Putin. Huge ramifications.When was the last time a major power ‘mobilized’ for war? I’m not sure if Korea or Vietnam were mobilizations? Might be WW2…
Vietnam involved conscription, at that point I would call in mobilisation.When was the last time a major power ‘mobilized’ for war? I’m not sure if Korea or Vietnam were mobilizations? Might be WW2…
When was the last time a major power ‘mobilized’ for war? I’m not sure if Korea or Vietnam were mobilizations? Might be WW2…
It is always difficult with Russia.Vietnam involved conscription, at that point I would call in mobilisation.
Vietnam involved conscription, at that point I would call in mobilisation.
And some wags say Russia has gone from being the second most powerful military country in the world to being the second most powerful military country in Ukraine. !!The kerfuffle with Ukraine and NATO has reduced Russia to a mid range power atm.
gg
I really don't care what Russia does, to be honest.
It is more Beijing's reaction and involvement, if any, that is the main danger.
This move by Putin was not unexpected and probably flagged to the West days ago from friendly cousins within the Kremlin nomenklatura.
It was actually discussed on R1 their version of " Your ABC " ( Politics for loyal babushkas ) about 3 hours before the announcement by Uncle Vova.
China is a bigger worry. The kerfuffle with Ukraine and NATO has reduced Russia to a mid range power atm.
gg
good pointThis has occurred only a couple of days after the Putin/Xi meeting. Must have got permission and some sort of tacit backing. Yes, that’s more troubling if China sign on.
Yeah, but the draft in the USA was a lot different than the normal National service, they drafted 2.2 Million people during the Vietnam war, and anybody of service age could be drafted, not just people leaving high school.Yeah, we did as well. National Service. A pile of countries have compulsory service after high school too. Not sure if the connotation is the same and what other laws are brought in for the war effort. Mobilization to me means some other extraordinary powers of State. Like diverting normal civilian industry to the war effort. Not sure if Russia has done that yet.
One thing that I have been thinking about for the past few weeks, is that for the last 30 years people have been saying that soldiers on the ground are almost obsolete, because the Air Force would quickly decimate ground forces in a real war.Hopefully the months of grind has taken its toll on the Russian military. If they are resorting to nuke threats they may just be spent on the ground.
All it will do is reinforce Europe's military machine and unite the west. China, Russia and Iran are in an anti-west bloc. Crumbling Russia would be a big strategic bonus.
do you have a link, I can't find the articleHot off the Press.
It would appear that China is not going to back Russia in a warry manner atm.
gg
One thing that I have been thinking about for the past few weeks, is that for the last 30 years people have been saying that soldiers on the ground are almost obsolete, because the Air Force would quickly decimate ground forces in a real war.
But, this fight in Ukraine has shown that it really is all about ground forces still, and that it only takes ground forces to be armed with some modern portable surface to Air missiles and the opposing Air Force backs right off. Russian pilots are terrified of the western anti air weapons, they aren't willing to risk close engagements after they have received a bloody nose in the early months.
One thing that I have been thinking about for the past few weeks, is that for the last 30 years people have been saying that soldiers on the ground are almost obsolete, because the Air Force would quickly decimate ground forces in a real war.
But, this fight in Ukraine has shown that it really is all about ground forces still, and that it only takes ground forces to be armed with some modern portable surface to Air missiles and the opposing Air Force backs right off. Russian pilots are terrified of the western anti air weapons, they aren't willing to risk close engagements after they have received a bloody nose in the early months.
Big takeaway is that you can never have enough high tech missiles. Also that cheap drones with 60mm mortars are a massive demoralising tool.One thing that I have been thinking about for the past few weeks, is that for the last 30 years people have been saying that soldiers on the ground are almost obsolete, because the Air Force would quickly decimate ground forces in a real war.
But, this fight in Ukraine has shown that it really is all about ground forces still, and that it only takes ground forces to be armed with some modern portable surface to Air missiles and the opposing Air Force backs right off. Russian pilots are terrified of the western anti air weapons, they aren't willing to risk close engagements after they have received a bloody nose in the early months.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.