- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,357
- Reactions
- 7,232
Your view on abortion agrees with most Americans but the third tier of politics has been politicised and the power of the judges is creating a new tyranny.Fair point too.
Once again, for the record. If forced to give an opinion on abortion on a legal/legislative basis, fair enough in the first trimester or thereabouts. After that I think you'd would need a pretty good reason to justify it. </personalopinion>
A theocracy. I don't think long term public sentiment will allow this to happen.Conservatives are pretty much sending the US back to the stone age and its mostly on narrative of their own making dressed up in BS.
They sound more like Islamic Mullahs but using Christianity for power and directing the masses..
It's not conservatives. It's 'populists' on the right.Conservatives are pretty much sending the US back to the stone age and its mostly on narrative of their own making dressed up in BS.
They sound more like Islamic Mullahs but using Christianity for power and directing the masses..
Quoting this for the second time, now that the chickens have come home to roost.In reality there would be very few states that would actually ban abortion although they may be limited up to a certain stage, and other certain conditions such as Florida has recently done.
Theres a total Ban in some states and a ban after 6 weeks and 15 weeks in others. Are 13 states going for total bans?Quoting this for the second time, now that the chickens have come home to roost.
The first time, I suggested that "Somewhere between a dozen and a score of states would jump on the bandwagon in an instant."
The number of states that acted immediately to ban abortion, or will do so soon, is 13: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/24/us-...itute-abortion-bans-following-roe-ruling.html
If 13 is "Very few" according to wayneL, I'd like to see where he gets his information from.
Looking ahead, next on the list is -
Ban gay marriage
Ban contraception
Ban women from voting
Reintroduce slavery.
The D.S A. (Disunited States of America) absolutely NEEDS a civil war
1/ Yes, but absolutely not because of SCOTUS decision.
Good old WEF. Time to eat bugs apparently.
I can only imagine the response if that protestor had been aboriginal and the officer was let off the hook.
I understand matching violence with violence. But matching insults with violence is hard for me to grasp. Internal police investigation ongoing. Wonder if this copper has had a few issues in the past?
I can only imagine the response if that protestor had been aboriginal and the officer was let off the hook.
I understand matching violence with violence. But matching insults with violence is hard for me to grasp. Internal police investigation ongoing. Wonder if this copper has had a few issues in the past?
The real question I have is why does one not even need to read the article to know that a problem involving police using excessive force will be in Victoria?I understand matching violence with violence. But matching insults with violence is hard for me to grasp. Internal police investigation ongoing. Wonder if this copper has had a few issues in the past?
I don't know. Could have been Canberra.The real question I have is why does one not even need to read the article to know that a problem involving police using excessive force will be in Victoria?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.