- Joined
- 28 October 2008
- Posts
- 8,609
- Reactions
- 39
It could also be that Tony Abbott is being underestimated, again.That's true, but that was then. Kevin is smarter now, and probably so, too, is Malcolm Turnbull. Mr Abbott, in contrast, seems somehow diminished in stature and in confidence.
It could also be that Tony Abbott is being underestimated, again.
The irony is that I believe Mr Abbott is fundamentally more trustworthy and less maniacally self interested than either of the other two above.
So to sum it up, appart from Abbotts slow measured speach and his unwillingness to announce policy till he sees fit, what is wrong with him?
As opposed to a snake oil salesman, selling everyone the story that he isn't to blame and he can fix it.lol
It could also be that Tony Abbott is being underestimated, again.
Time will tell.
I also mentioned months ago that you needed Turnbull.
Australia is screaming out for trustworthy politicians, without the spin, without the BS
So you think when Tony wouldn't advise the names of the donors to the slush fund "Honest Politics" he created to get rid of Pauline Hanson he's the kind of honest no BS politicians you're talking about?
I mean his words were "..there are some things the public has no particular right to know." If that's not contempt for the people he servers, then what is??
He spun so many lies to weasel his way out. If I read correctly he either lied to the AEC or he's lied multiple times on the ABC and various newspapers.
He may be no worse than the mobs we have on both sides of the house, but he's certainly just as mucky as they are.
http://www.independentaustralia.net/2012/politics/tony-abbott-and-his-slushy-question-of-character/
He may be no worse than the mobs we have on both sides of the house, but he's certainly just as mucky as they are.
You'll have to delve deeper into the muck to find a politician as sleazy as your hero, Slipper.
Not half as much as Labor and the Greens do.
I'm sure if there is something to answer, he should be and will be done. Same as Slipper was
Labor would like nothing better than being able to take Abbott to task, so if he is guilty they will be onto it.
So, either they are dumber than I think, or you have an issue that can't be substantiated, at this time.
The other option is, he doesn't have anything to answer for and you are getting all bent up and out of shape over nothing. Time will tell.
Did u even bother to spend 5 minutes reading the link I posted?
It would be hard not to think Abbott should front up and answer some tough questions. Seems he was always harping on for others to answer the questions, but he never seems to.
I, don't need anyone.Your judgement and foresight is one thing,
but how the electorate are taking it all in looks more and more like quite another.
Election result to be................. ALP 55%, Lib/Nats 45%
And the Greens will hold on to keep them all honest.
I also mentioned months ago that you needed Turnbull.
No Champ, but thanks for the offer
because we have shiny kruddy boy and the people tuned into thier TV.s
Channel 10 relied on the young audience, see where it got them.lol
Andrew bolt?
It was the first time I had spoken to Craig Thomson. I came away impressed by this man’s sincerity, civic-mindedness, decency and strong intelligence. It must be said, IA has never uncovered any evidence in all its thousands of hours of investigations to suggest Thomson has done anything untoward. I may be proven wrong, but I would be surprised if Craig Thomson is guilty of anything other than a little naiveté about the depths some people will plunge to achieve their own selfish ends via grubby gutter politics.
You'll have to delve deeper into the muck to find a politician as sleazy as your hero, Slipper.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?