- Joined
- 8 April 2008
- Posts
- 871
- Reactions
- 0
I think it is very wrong for you to suggest that the French are less civilised than we are. You are being insulting and derogatory and I am sure that many French people would be offended.
Maybe we are more civilised than the French. Your example says it all.
Just saw that Pickering has been warned that a recent cartoon he drew (Sundar just gone) has offended Muslims and he has been offered police protection.
In that audio on 4BC Radio, the wanker responds to the following questions:-
Loretta 4BC announcer
"So you have posted something of the prophet Muhammad on you website?"
Pickering
"Absolutely"
Loretta 4BC announcer
"Just describe what was that you posted?"
Pickering
"No, go to the site and have a look yourself."
So the big hero has not got the balls to verbalise what he actually drew.
Very good answer. The lazy, dumb journo should have looked at the web-site before starting the interview. She was clearly judging the content without having seen it.
No he just had the balls to publish on his web-site.
Which requires the greater set of balls?
Rubbish, it was radio, not television. Listeners can't see the cartoon, so the radio announcer asked Pickering the question.
BTW, the scum bag goes on to attack the radio announcer for no reason what so ever.
The radio announcer was a woman, so I don't know what you are talking about.
In other words you are saying if it had been television they would have shown viewers the cartoon, hell would have frozen over and the sky would have been filled with a flock of flying pigs.
If the dumb, lazy radio journo had bothered to look at the web-site herself she would have been able to describe the contents for her listeners herself.
I didn’t say ‘who’ has the greater balls I said ‘which’ (referring to an action) so I was not referring to the woman. But if I had been referring to her surely the answer is obvious for anyone who knows the rudimentaries of anatomy.
What do you think they got Pickering on the radio program for?
To ask him the question of what he actually drew in the cartoon.
The radio announcer did not draw the cartoon and there has been conjecture on this forum of what he actually drew.
Well, "7.30" this evening broadcast several of the cartoons. Shall we wait and see if the sky falls in on the ABC?Very interesting. Do you mean the cartoon at this link
Now who will be brave enough to place a copy of it here?
I think no-one, myself included.
+1. I don't understand the seemingly growing desire to ever push the boundaries on how hateful and insulting one person or organisation can be to another. Some of the social media posts just leave me speechless, and now we seem here to be engaged in a discussion about who can be the most nasty and yet not expect retaliation.Inciting racial hatred is in the same league as defamation, just because you have the right to freedom of speech doesn't mean you can defame people and not have consequences.
I suppose it's how he expresses himself. He has been allowed to speak in Australia, albeit finding himself confronted with mass protests from the usual objectors.As I understand it, Wilders is vociferous against Islam,
As Islam is not a race, but an ideology, why should what he says against Islam come under the Racial Discrimination Act ?
Plenty of people on this board have said words to the same effect. Should we all be arrested ?
The idea of banning Wilders is quite reprehensible. As long as he delineates the discussion to the ideology and not the people practising it, he has every right to say what he wants.
As I've already mentioned, "7.30" broadcast some of the cartoons this evening. I'll be a bit surprised if the program fails to go to air tomorrow because they've all been arrested.If Charlie Hebdo had been in Australia, the cartoonists would have been arrested by the State which would have saved the terrorists the trouble of murdering them
Macquack, are you not yourself doing just what you're denigrating others for doing with your unpleasant language?Larry Pickering is a scum bag.
Hello, lets jump on the bandwagon and insult all muslims, you missed the boat you d***head.
In that audio on 4BC Radio, the wanker responds to the following questions:-
Loretta 4BC announcer
"So you have posted something of the prophet Muhammad on you website?"
Pickering
"Absolutely]"
Loretta 4BC announcer
"Just describe what was that you posted?"
Pickering
"No, go to the site and have a look yourself."
So the big hero has not got the balls to verbalise what he actually drew.
And the prick gets police protection. Where was the protection for all the people that Pickering fleeced with his underhanded and fraudulent scams?
http://www.smh.com.au/business/larry-pickering--the-conman-stalking-gillard-20120820-24hxi.html
And for Noco
http://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com...igating-julia-gillard-for-the-awu-fraud-scam/
As I've already mentioned, "7.30" broadcast some of the cartoons this evening. I'll be a bit surprised if the program fails to go to air tomorrow because they've all been arrested.
Well, "7.30" this evening broadcast several of the cartoons. Shall we wait and see if the sky falls in on the ABC?
Sorry, Bintang. I couldn't describe them now. I'm sure you would be able to see the program segment on the ABC website.I’m curious to know which cartoons. Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson is quoted by The Australian as saying that “while many of the religiously themed cartoons in Charlie Hebdo would not fall foul of the discrimination act ……. racial stereo-typing of Jews and other ethnic groups would create too many legal issues”
So I suspect the ABC has been fairly selective about what it has shown.
I have already covered this in my post #198 about the media starting to show a little backbone. The State wouldn't dare apply Section I8C in the face of a little media solidarity.
Did he really? I’m not aware of that but how about quoting your source and I might take notice?
.
What’s wrong with asking do you want more chinese?
And what is wrong with asking any of the following:
- Do you want more legal immigration?
- Do you want more illegal immigration (i.e. boat arrivals)?
- Do you want more muslims ?
- Do you want more Iraqis?
These are just questions. If it is wrong to ask them then it is just more resounding proof that we are controlled by political correctness and censorship and without doubt we have lost our freedom of speech – Q.E.D
Sorry, Bintang. I couldn't describe them now. I'm sure you would be able to see the program segment on the ABC website.
They did put up English language translations, not sure of whether for all of them.
I could take or leave them. Couldn't get excited either way, but that's all very well I suppose when I'm not the target.
Too often in life, something happens and we blame other people for us not being happy or satisfied or fulfilled. So the point is, we all have choices, and we make the choice to accept people or situations or to not accept situations.
Tom Brady
Remembering that I'll be dead soon is the most important tool I've ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because almost everything - all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure - these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important.
Steve Jobs
I can't imagine anyone will publish Larry Pickering's cartoon though, which by the way I think is highly insulting to pigs.
There are some brilliant comments on the web-site such as this one:
"Larry ol_mate, I have been enjoying your work since I was a W#g, when I became a 'New Bloody Australian', your work was more enjoyable. Now that I am 'An Old Bugger' I can't live without logging on every day. You have problems Larry, if the Jihadist don't get you, the Law under section 18c will. That is unless Abbott somehow finds some guts and repeals this section. I was horrified that Charlie Hebdo magazine cannot be printed in Aus, so much for free country, that I migrated to. Take care old mate and watch your back"
I do realise I am assuming the above to be genuine and I could be wrong. NB: The original post uses the letter 'o' in place of the # symbol.
Google his name and "Moroccan scum" and you will find multiple sources.
Asking whether we want more immigration is a valid question, asking if we want to deny certain races immigration is not.
Nah. Section 18C will not be applied by this government. They haven't got the guts to apply it and they haven't got the guts to repeal it.They got Andrew Bolt under 18C on a trumped up charge, but that was under a Labor government and a Labor appointed Judge. There was no outcry because all the usual suspects hate Bolt because he stands for freedom of expression. But I think the tide is now turning and freedom of expression will get a better run, thanks to Charlie Hebro.
I see no reason (other than political correctness) why denying immigration to certain races cannot be a point of discussion.
Ok, perhaps thats something you need to work on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?