- Joined
- 3 April 2013
- Posts
- 1,056
- Reactions
- 269
Hmmm, pretty happy I dont trade yet.
Is that not the reverse of what I said then. The shorts by absorbing on the way up are getting on the wrong side, then selling what they absorbed on the way up plus their initial position?
Haha I think I am confusing myself now. At some stage was somebody going long or short at a worse price than what they wanted to so at a later stage they could unwind an initial position?
Cheers Barney, thats what I was thinking.
If futures are a zero sum game and I assume there would not be enough losing retail investors to generate profit for all the big players, where do they generate profit? If some of the big players consistently profitable then there must be big consistent losers?
I realise different systems and different time scales, but eventually if futures are a zero sum game then there has to be a big loser for there to be a big winner (assuming there are not enough small players)
I might be wrong here, but I reckon the biggest losers will be the guys using the futures for what they were originally designed for, the hedgers.
A company can make a hedge on the exchange rate for example, so they don't have to worry about the risk of currency changes/fluctuations on their cost of doing business. The company can effectively lock in the exchange rate and is not trading to make money.
Kind of like like buying insurance. With house insurance for example you pay someone to take on the risk of your house burning down and whatever else the insurance covers. Obviously the insurance companies make money so we are on the end of losing trades buying insurance, but we are happy to pay someone to take on our risk that we do not want or can't afford to take.
wow @ the ftse open
Won't stop there either.
Agreed looks very heavy
maybe stops above 6623 but not sure it gets up there
That'll do.
Night all
TH penny for your thoughts.
There's about fifty thousand PMI numbers which come out of China each month. Which one do you give the most weighting to? My experience has been that no one gives a rats about the non-manufacturing PMI, but the manufacturing obviously influences aussie markets but theres the Markit, theres the HSBC, theres official. Which one is the real market mover?
All very confusing
The official has a much larger spread of enterprises (3000 I think), many more medium companies, than the HSBC (430). But it doesn't really matter the market reads it as it wants; good can be good, good can be bad. (and with China official data you can bet that everyone who matters already knows about it) It has more to do with what type of market we are in. I said to a friend yesterday morning that I was going to have a short day. I just guessed that being 1st of Dec we would be bullish and thats the way the market would read it. So got long early and hung on till the pop.
At the start of the year the PMI was just about every time used to smash the market even when month to month the reading changed significantly.:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?