The effect is to retain jobs and support business. You can see the alternative overseas.So business could spring back to no jobs no wage growth and no policies
The effect is to retain jobs and support business. You can see the alternative overseas.
Excellent article in today's Age showing how Christian Portman realised what he had to do after business people rang him in desperation. To keep jobs and business going he joined with the Unions to modify awards and develop a plan. This plan will be enhanced going forward.
We are still going to have a rough time but our political process is working.
Great post, do you own a business?, great common sense and realistic view, like it !The effect is to retain jobs and support business. You can see the alternative overseas.
Excellent article in today's Age showing how Christian Portman realised what he had to do after business people rang him in desperation. To keep jobs and business going he joined with the Unions to modify awards and develop a plan. This plan will be enhanced going forward.
We are still going to have a rough time but our political process is working.
In one as an associate but not one of the directors.Great post, do you own a business?, great common sense and realistic view, like it !
I am OK with supporting full time workers keep their jobs with Job Keeper, otherwise the main engine will struggle. And we all will pay with future taxes etc whether you are working full time, part time or casual. So there is no discrimination when it comes to giving back to the Government.I think jobkeeper was done to avoid company collapses and allow fora restart.
It is not people welfare, it is company welfare.
Without it, for companies..and i mean the bread and butter SMEs running this country, not the big corporations, ,: They would have had to sack employeesay all the due holiday leaves, extra redundancy payment.
If not collapsed by the extra cost, at restart,rehire retrain new people having lost their best employees and skills.it would have been an economic carnage.
So the government tried the save the economy first, which is not a leftist idea, but actually makes sense.
Was it hard for the casual and students etc left behind, oh yeah, but if the economy is left to restart, they have a chance to get a job again whereas otherwise, no one would be left to employ them
No perfect solution
Jobseeker was supposed to care for them.did it fail? I know about job keeper,not enough about job seeker
Indeed, be it Rudd or Malcolm, this should not happen.It's sad the people chosen Prime Minister was thrown out of the Parliament by the internal crooks who plotted his fall.
Yes indeed, there would have been a bit more planning and checking the fairness of it before unleashing the biggest stimulus upon the Australian economy if they executed it. So I think people of Australia as a whole choose a prime minister that they want in power not what the party wants or what the political crooks want !Indeed, be it Rudd or Malcolm, this should not happen.
I think it's about being "shovel, or nail-gun, ready" (not getting a bureaucracy up to speed to allocate, with attendant process & delays) and also alignment with Lib 'values', individual choice and all that rather than KRudd consensus. But is there a huge amount of money on offer?? Plus, the lack of filter means more going to big cities; I'd rather some targeted 'decentralisation'. More bang for the buck, there.A lot of us on these forums may not take up the stimulus since it's a pretty steep $150k to entry fee ! That's based on all the discussions I've been having with members.
But I think we ASF'ers represent a very small slice of the Aussie pie and my gut feeling is large percentage of the population will take it up, given the love affair with homes in the country.
He's a singer in U2Qui bono?
”Bono" is a tw@t, not a Latin interrogative.He's a singer in U2
Couldn't agree more. It's certainly aimed at that.alignment with Lib 'values'
But I think we ASF'ers represent a very small slice of the Aussie pie
Yes Agree. I think it is time to roll up the sleeves and simply get working, cast aside the political bull sheet and work with honour and pride.I think it's about being "shovel, or nail-gun, ready" (not getting a bureaucracy up to speed to allocate, with attendant process & delays)...
Totally agree. I also meant in a good way about a lot of us ASF members not taking up the homebuilder offer. Lot of us feel like it's a debt trap to walk into, given we already have mortgages up to our chest. No need to go deeper into debt up to the eye balls and complain we can't breathe thanks to that shiny new home extension or reno. I mean, we are not talking a small loan to add on, for most of us anyway.A stock market forum with people who actually have real knowledge - by its very nature that's a niche thing. In a good way not a bad way certainly, but a niche thing nonetheless.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.