tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,447
- Reactions
- 6,477
Bill
All well and good if your holding remains at least 10%
more than your initial or accumulated purchase price.
TLS was considered cheap ---- once ---- at $ 6.
Purchasing purely for dividends can be very costly
If the core holding continues to tank
A deminishing dividend doest instil confidence in the future
Bill
All well and good if your holding remains at least 10%
more than your initial or accumulated purchase price.
TLS was considered cheap ---- once ---- at $ 6.
Purchasing purely for dividends can be very costly
If the core holding continues to tank
A deminishing dividend doest instil confidence in the future
QBE has always paid a decent div, sometimes as much as 6.6% per year.
View attachment 44030
4 year chart. OUCH.
(blue chip all the way, can't go wrong, pays a great reliable dividend yield, always about 6%. 6% x $ 13 = 0.78 cps, 0.78 cps / $34.00 ps = 2.3 cps plus you have 62% capital loss. Be careful which stocks pay dividends for you.
A bit off topic for the ASX is tanking panic thread but maybe I can encourage people to talk shorts on the shorting thread now that the weeks of panic are over. Or are they?
You seem to be very negative about everything?
Or do you just look at everything from a purely technical point of view?
Are you still of the mindset that the worst is yet to come?
Dividend trading can be very successful if you are good at it. Many people make their money this way..
Obviously you have to be smart about it though because the share will shed its div price when it goes ex div. You just have to be sure it will recover + a bit to get your advantage.
How have you objectively and actually determined that you do have a "major edge" over "ultra short term punters?"I don't day trade, while my comfort zone is broad, its most definitely not ultra short term...i often think that the major "edge" i have is time, its one of my great advantages over the ultra short term punters.
I'd have thought the net amount of dividends would be rather more relevant than the number of cheques!Hey Bill...i would be interested to know just how many dividend and distribution cheques did you get last financial year?
For the record i received 36 payments.
How is your capital going, Bill? Growing? Down?I manage both mine and the wifes portfolio, between us we got about 44 dividend drops. It doesn't sound like much but I have some large holdings like TLS that pay close to 10% FF yield. As an exercise with TLS (for example only, not suggesting this is a good idea) one could hold 400K worth of that stock and pull 40K a year in dividends tax paid. That is near $800 bucks a week, some people work a year for that kind of money. I have a portfolio full of dividend payers with some preference shares paying 13% gross dividend.
Or alternatively you could eschew such emotional notions as comfort zones and say that trend followers (or followers of any given technique) have objectively worked out that this offers them the best means of preserving capital and profits, and minimising losses.I've only recently begun to understand the full implications of comfort zones and how they affect behaviour in the individual...in life you can pretty much put any human behaviour in the context of personal comfort zones...a space where the individual is comfortable and thus able to operation rationally and deliberately.
Move them outside that zone, or move the zone and panic and irrationality will begin...if we use trend following as an example one could say that certain people are attracted to trend following because they feel comfortable doing it and have success because they can act with deliberate and rational thought and so profit using the rules of trend following.
Oh please, SC. Markets fall quickly because a massive number of unconnected people are all sitting around navel gazing and contemplating their 'comfort zones'???Now when the comfort zone moves for a typical trend follower..say in a steeply falling market they would sell as that's what the rules of trend following tells them to do, and so they stay within there comfort zone by selling...so we can see why markets fall so quickly is because a certain number of market participants feel uncomfortable holding and so liquidate to regain a level of comfort thus accelerating the market decline.
Could be that they don't allow emotions to influence their trading and therefore they just apply one of of the three S's when it starts to cost money, ie, Sell, Sack or Stop it.
Good traders don't allow emotions to influence their decisions, the market is just numbers that they work with, emotions distort common sense.
Zackly.I use a calculator or a couple of mental calculations based on reward/risk to calculate my stop loss when I buy a stock.
There are no emotions in that, its simple numbers based on controlling loss, emotion doesn't come into it.
I don't have to manage emotions because it is just a simple calculation. Why include emotion ?
QBE is a great example of the futility of buying because (a) it has a decent dividend, and/or (b) It's a so called great business.QBE has always paid a decent div, sometimes as much as 6.6% per year.
View attachment 44030
4 year chart. OUCH.
(blue chip all the way, can't go wrong, pays a great reliable dividend yield, always about 6%. 6% x $ 13 = 0.78 cps, 0.78 cps / $34.00 ps = 2.3 cps plus you have 62% capital loss. Be careful which stocks pay dividends for you.
One thing I have always wondered is; if you have a stock that provides a steadily growing income stream (compared to when you bought it 10 years ago, obviously TLS does not come into this equation) why do you care about short-term capital fluctuations?How is your capital going, Bill? Growing? Down?
I manage both mine and the wifes portfolio, between us we got about 44 dividend drops. It doesn't sound like much but I have some large holdings like TLS that pay close to 10% FF yield. As an exercise with TLS (for example only, not suggesting this is a good idea) one could hold 400K worth of that stock and pull 40K a year in dividends tax paid. That is near $800 bucks a week, some people work a year for that kind of money. I have a portfolio full of dividend payers with some preference shares paying 13% gross dividend. It is those kind of stocks I buy when everyone sells them at ridiculously low prices, cheers.
How is your capital going, Bill? Growing? Down?
Bill
As a self funded retiree
Where do you get funds to " buy heavily " in this down turn.?
Or do you have superfluous passive income-- a fair bit of it!
Remember the Dow is comprised of only 30 or so stocks.
Bill
As a self funded retiree
Where do you get funds to " buy heavily " in this down turn.?
Or do you have superfluous passive income-- a fair bit of it!
I've asked this question of others elsewhere.
Folks talk as if fully invested and suddenly have boxes of cash when the market goes down the ****-chute.
Not pointing the finger at anyone in particular, but I think there is a fair bit of embellishment at times here.
It seems a lot of people only brag about buying when the market is tanked and people are panicking - very rarely do you hear about people bragging about selling when the market is peaking.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?