- Joined
- 6 September 2008
- Posts
- 7,676
- Reactions
- 68
I disagree. Americans see the right to bear arms as the same as freedom of speech. For many, who don't even own guns, they still believe that someone should have the right that right. They certainly won't believe that the government should be allowed to take that right away.
Just look at the support for handguns...Even assault weapons, which outside the theatre of war have zero use, still manage to get 50% support.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/150341/Record-Low-Favor-Handgun-Ban.aspx
If only 26% favour gun control then let them take the consequences.
BUT -
Something as important as this deserves a referendum, polls can be manipulated.
If a referendum shows the same figures then 26% better move elsewhere, discussion over.
26% favour handgun control, not gun control.
The US Constitution isn't changed by referendum.
The number of people who would want the Second Amendment repealed, I'd hazard, would be less than 10%.
They seem ready to deal with assault (rapid fire) weapons for a start, at least thats something, more damage is done wth those than single shot weapons.
I don't disagree with you Burnsie. What I'm saying is that guns will still be easily available, relatively and absolutely. Assault weapons are indefensible, even for the most ardent gun rights supporter. Getting rid of 30 round magazines would probably be a good move too. The bigger problem is handguns. What happened in Sandy Hook is the big news but the majority of gun homicides are with handguns.
While there are a few exceptions (animal culling etc) I don't see why the average person needs access to these sort of firearms, which Lanza used.
President Obama sought on Friday to enlist supporters to mount a public lobbying campaign on behalf of gun control in the wake of the mass killings in Newtown, Conn., suggesting that Congress would listen only if forced to by a populist backlash to gun violence.
In a video posted on the White House Web site, Mr. Obama responded to a petition demanding action on gun control. “We hear you,” the president said as he again vowed to push to Congress in the new year to ban assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips.
“I can’t do it alone,” he added. “I need your help. If we’re going to succeed, it’s going to take a sustained effort from mothers and fathers, daughters and sons, law enforcement and responsible gun owners, organizing, speaking up, calling their members of Congress as many times as it takes, standing up and saying enough on behalf of all our kids. That’s how change happens.”
Just saw Mark (Chopper) Reid at Kmart, thought I might ask his opinion but he really is a knife man.
Wasn't sure at first but when he walked away I knew.......................right ear missing.
I don't disagree with you Burnsie. What I'm saying is that guns will still be easily available, relatively and absolutely. Assault weapons are indefensible, even for the most ardent gun rights supporter. Getting rid of 30 round magazines would probably be a good move too. The bigger problem is handguns. What happened in Sandy Hook is the big news but the majority of gun homicides are with handguns.
While there are a few exceptions I don't see why the average person or even recreational hunter needs access to these sort of firearms, which Lanza used.
View attachment 50079
Unless you're on a farm or in law enforcement there's no need for anyone to have guns, I agree.
It will take decades to sort things out but if they don't start they'll never finish.
I cant recall any massacre of this type being prevented by an intended victim using a gun of their own.
Well, you've read the NRA's response:
If everybody 3 years and older had an automatic assault rifle, the death toll could've been much lower.
Not sure though, how many would've been caught in the crossfire from scores of "good guys" defending themselves and trying to take the bad guy out. But they would then count as "collateral damage", not murder victims...
The mind boggles ...
the new deal motto: NRA, Not Really American!
Obama Asks Supporters to Push Congress on Gun Control
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/21/obama-asks-supporters-to-push-congress-on-gun-control/
Unless you're on a farm or in law enforcement there's no need for anyone to have guns, I agree.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?