wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,581
- Reactions
- 12,707
As highlighted in the statement, ASIO concerns itself with terrorism and international espionage. The statement stresses Islamic terrorism as the principal threat, with Neonazists being much smaller in number.The invisible ones are very useful... They're every where and no where...
now back to realm of reality..
We'll see if this can help'm a little Focus.
As a community service this is Burgess's Statement in Full. For those that seem oblivious to it.
https://www.asio.gov.au/director-generals-annual-threat-assessment.html
Better late than never for a few in here, an understanding of the 'Origins of Totalitarianism' (it's a book) is well covered by Hannah Arendts seminal work. Acutely pertinent as we speak is Part 1 devoted to Antisemitism given Frydenbergs speech at the war memorial yesterday.
Understanding...Mmmm... now there's a threatening concept to those with a 'thick' defensive cloak of ignorance. Unbutton a little, do some reading, you'll actually feel better. The boogey men will fade.
But the Fascists? they're all to real.
This however is not the only threats of violence. Never heard of antifa borr? These beta cucks love to congregate, wear masks and hassle ordinary folk just wanting to hear speakers, causing many events to be cancelled due to the threat of their violence.
Overseas these have been designated terrorist organisations. They are a threat of violence borr, ASIO just had not seen fit to lump them in with real terrorists... Yet.
If I wanted to go listen a conservative speaker, I would genuinely be concerned for my safety because of their *history of violence.