Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
I didn't think so either. It seemed a pretty factual account to me.Did you actually read the extract? Nowhere in it does it refer to a gender problem.
I didn't think so either. It seemed a pretty factual account to me.Did you actually read the extract? Nowhere in it does it refer to a gender problem.
Did you actually read the extract? Nowhere in it does it refer to a gender problem.
Public support for Gillard and her government started crashing in February 2011, after she announced she would introduce a carbon pricing scheme. Her critics claimed she had broken an ironclad election promise not to introduce a ''carbon tax''. During the election campaign she had stated: ''There will be no carbon tax under a government I lead, but let me be clear: I will be putting a price on carbon and I will move to an emissions trading scheme.'' This is what she announced, but not as far as those in the opposition and hysterical commentariat were concerned.
If we want to look broadly at the impression Labor attempted to give the electorate on carbon pricing during the 2010 election campaign, the first post of the carbon tax thread lays it out clearly."''There will be no carbon tax under a government I lead, but let me be clear: I will be putting a price on carbon and I will move to an emissions trading scheme.''
I don’t think that’s the ‘way to go’ at all. By all means speak the truth in a very forthright manner, as she did, but her snarling way of doing it will alienate some people. Letting anger and emotions take control is not in the best interests of any politician.
The 'way to go' bit was not meant to be taken in the literal sense that all politicians should snarl. It's just a saying offering admiration of a particular instance.
She was no more snarling than was Gillard in her infamous misogyny speech and made a far more real point about the sisterhood, for all their cant, having ultimately deserted Gillard in a final gesture of hypocrisy.
If she can modify the over-the-top stuff, I think she's a pretty impressive performer.
If Rudd falls ill Anthony Albanese, will be PM........think about it.
If Rudd topples, it doesn't automatically mean Albo is promoted. Leader and deputy leader are seperate ballots. Look at the Liberals - Bishop has been deputy for how long and for how many leaders?
If Rudd topples, it doesn't automatically mean Albo is promoted. Leader and deputy leader are seperate ballots. Look at the Liberals - Bishop has been deputy for how long and for how many leaders?
Albo, of course will be acting PM while Kevin 747 is tripping about. I think Rudd will delay the election long enough to make triumphal "look at me" overseas tours.
Yes, and hasn't he also suggested he might even take Mr Abbott along to the G20? I can just picture it: Rudd strutting the world stage, Tony trailing behind him like Tim did after Gillard.I think Rudd will delay the election long enough to make triumphal "look at me" overseas tours.
Bishop is your classic "loyal" deputy.
If Rudd topples, it doesn't automatically mean Albo is promoted. Leader and deputy leader are seperate ballots. Look at the Liberals - Bishop has been deputy for how long and for how many leaders?
The latest Morgan poll gives you some false hope.LOL yes she also has a bank called "Gina" hence deputy not so sure about the loyal
The latest Morgan poll gives you some false hope.
http://www.roymorgan.com/~/media/Files/Findings/2013/July/5010-Fed-Vote-July-1-2013.pdf
Not if he's also looking at the Sportsbet odds. That still has Labor way behind.That's good. It might encourage Rudd to go to the polls earlier.
Today is the third anniversary of those words.The first fatal blow....for her and Labor
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.