I've finally figured out what Julia Gillard's new year resolution is. It must be the same every year:
"I will not tell any more lies"
Under Government I lead.
I've finally figured out what Julia Gillard's new year resolution is. It must be the same every year:
"I will not tell any more lies"
Under Government I lead.
It would simplify things administratively.I agree that Labor's claim to have greatly reduced tax for low income earners is twisting the truth, but I don't see the benefit of going back to a more complicated arrangement for no net change.
Surely it is clearer and simpler to have a higher threshold and remove the low income offset.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/...mments/fordham_grills_gillard_on_awu_scandal/
Transcript of pretty hard hitting interview with Ms Gillard by Ben Fordham who is apparently with 2GB.
(Hard to imagine she'll agree to another interview with him in future!)
Newman as opposition leaders do made a lot of noise about how bad things are what he was gunna do to make it all better.
Basically he has done very little except bring in Costello to made over blown claims of the states debt position, bash homosexuals and increase the unemployment rate none of which will solve the states debt problems
How has Costello bashed homosexuals?
How do you know he made over-blown claims about the state's debt?
On what basis do you claim Costello was brought in to increase the unemployment rate?
.
IFocus – I’m a little disappointed that two or three days after I asked you these questions, you still haven’t answered them. What’s the problem – are these questions too hard for you?
I said recently that you have a talent for making wildly exaggerated claims that you can’t substantiate.
Are we seeing another example of this in your failure to answer these questions?
Come on, my friend – you’ve made some pretty hard-hitting statements in claiming that Newman brought Costello in to bash homosexuals, make overblown claims about Queensland’s debt situation, and increase the unemployment rate. If these claims have any substance then it should be a simple matter for you to back them up with solid argument and sound reasoning to substantiate your views.
Let’s see if you’re up to it.
Or did you just say the first silly thing that came into your head, without first thinking it through...as you’ve done so many times before on this and other threads?
The Costello comment was only meant to be about over blowing the debt issue the rest is related to the Newman government which has been through the news.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/...mments/fordham_grills_gillard_on_awu_scandal/
Transcript of pretty hard hitting interview with Ms Gillard by Ben Fordham who is apparently with 2GB.
(Hard to imagine she'll agree to another interview with him in future!)
The Costello comment was only meant to be about over blowing the debt issue the rest is related to the Newman government which has been through the news.
.
Then maybe you should say what you actually mean.
And in regard to your claim about Newman bringing in Costello to overblow Queensland’s debt situation – on what basis do you make such a claim?
Both analyses conclude that the Costello report focuses almost exclusively on the liabilities side of the Queensland balance sheet while understating assets, at the same time as shifting the goalposts when it comes to accounting standards to inflate the size of the problem.
As Prof Walker notes: "In fact employee expenses have remained fairly stable over an 11-year period if expressed as a percentage of total expenses in the range of 34 to 38 per cent, peaking at 38 per cent in 2005-06 and falling to 35 per cent in 2010-11."
Unfortunately, for his side of politics, Costello may have also condemned the new Liberal National Party government to a life of cutting and burning, his audit report having attacked Labor so much that only a recalcitrant Premier Campbell Newman would not implement its recommendations in full.
The report is full of damning one-liners, of how the previous Labor government was so irresponsible and reckless, but endeavours to be all black-and-white when there are various shades of grey in government spending. Political context would have been useful, too.
Labor, nonetheless, won that election too, and then embarked on a series of budget reforms marked by an unheralded privatisation program and the abolition of a fuel subsidy, both of which contributed to the downfall of the Bligh government this year.
Ironically, had Labor lost the 2009 election, the LNP would have taken much the same path as the Bligh government, and probably lost power this year.
The Costello report almost endorses the strategy undertaken by Labor and opposed by voters, even if the public backlash was more a result of the lack of consultation.
Newman has the nickname Can-Do, but perhaps that should be Can't Afford.
IFocus, don't want to get into Queensland politics, I know sod all about them.
How do you reckon the W.A election will go?
Labor and the unions have thrown $hit loads of money and the kitchen sink at it.
I think McGowan has done a great job, do you think it was enough?
Barnett should stroll in which I don't mind I think over all he has done well and is respected by most but he is carrying the government on his shoulders so I hope his health holds up for the term.
McGowan has run a good campaign if he loses only a couple of seats that would be a good result IMHO.
One of the experts is funded by unions but his numbers are correct.
Queensland's Peter Costello 'audit' trashed by experts
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...ashed-by-experts/story-fndo1yus-1226466757844
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.