This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The Gillard Government

More importantly, the whole of the ALP think Aussies are stupid.

Why else would they continue to spin, spin, spin. Everything is Abbott's fault. They are not to blame for anything!

(At least Paul Howes admits his mistake)

Yes and the Labor parrots have been brainwashed with the same lines whenver they are interviewed.

"ABBOT IS WRAPPED UP IN COTTON WOOL AND WON'T ATTEND PRESS INTERVIEWS". Does this sound familiar?

Can you blame him for steering clear of the biased ABC?

Have you ever seen Gillard or Swan on the popular Bolt report on Sundays? I wonder why/
 
Interesting change.

Vote Labor/Likely to vote Labor stands at 30%, 42235 votes counted. This means that 62% of the 11547 voters between the two counts would vote Labor/Likely to vote Labor.

Coull someone please pass the salt.



Yes, more likely to vote Labor 23%
Yes, more likely to vote Liberal/National 15%
Yes, more likely to vote Greens/other 3%
No, still voting Labor 11%
No, still voting Liberal/National 38%
No, still voting Greens/other 10%

Total votes: 46804.
 


Your bias is extraordinary Gittens lays the blame squarely on the government he just makes the point that the big reforms received bipartisan support Abbott has failed on this front.
 
Your bias is extraordinary Gittens lays the blame squarely on the government he just makes the point that the big reforms received bipartisan support Abbott has failed on this front.

LOL - this is the title of his article: Abbott must share the blame for tax stuff-upl

I still say it is pretty lame to try to blame Abbott because he was doing his job as opposition leader AND because he was polling better.

And, as I said before, neither of these two factors have stopped Gillard passing whatever legislation she has wanted even when it has been against the will of the majority of Aussies, such as carbon tax, border policy and massive debt. Labor raised the debt ceiling - I don't think they would have cared two hoots what Abbott said or thought.

As usual, just more of "the dog ate my homework" type excuses while trying to make Abbott look like the bad guy.

Won't work...Aussies are waking up to this...
 
Gittens lays the blame squarely on the government he just makes the point that the big reforms received bipartisan support Abbott has failed on this front.
bipartisanship could have been on no resources super profit tax, which ironically, is about what we've ended up with.

It's a pity though that Labor's spent the money.
 
Your bias is extraordinary Gittens lays the blame squarely on the government he just makes the point that the big reforms received bipartisan support Abbott has failed on this front.

Why anyone would read Gittin, is beyond me, most of the time it's incoherent ramblings.
Much like some of us on the forum.lol
 
An interesting look back to an article I posted on the 4th July 2010 in the "Mining Tax Grab" thread...

Some excerpts from the article link below from the miners who attended the meeting (bolds are mine):

…What we were especially amazed at was the level of sheer naivete and incompetence. The grasp of fundamental economics -- more specifically commercial reality -- was barely past what you learn in year 12 at high school.…


…In the end the miners were not provided with Treasury's modelling until last Wednesday. These were the numbers that, according one insider, had come from "planet Mars"…

…”They had made it up and had no idea how to back it up. It was like sitting university professors down to lecture primary school students," one of the miners' advisers claimed yesterday…

Full article: Treasury tarnished by turn of events over mining super tax
 

One has to wonder about the motives of the people involved.

Sometimes the end, justifies the means.
All the plebs have, is a belief in karma.
 
I don't know about motives - it looks like Swan and treasury simply had no idea going by that article.

Treasury was excluded from the talks. My understanding is all of the figures etc. were been done by political advisers in Gillard's/Swan's office who simply didn't have the expertise needed to negotiate on an even footing with the miners.
 
Treasury was excluded from the talks. My understanding is all of the figures etc. were been done by political advisers in Gillard's/Swan's office who simply didn't have the expertise needed to negotiate on an even footing with the miners.
Which would lead to the result.
Everyone got the outcome they wanted. Wouldn't it?
 

Took them long enough to work that one out. Meanwhile Fairfax's share price has been plummeting since 2006 - you would think they would have done something about it long ago.
 
Bill Ludwig - another union leader at the trough of the Union funds.

The AWU paid a $45,000 legal bill for Ludwig's private (non union) matter.

Union members at the conference love this sort of stuff.
 

Maybe you missed this bit
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...