I found this article (day before the election) titled "Julia Gillard's Carbon Price Promise"Ves - if that is so, then please explain to me why Gillard AND Swan stated NO CARBON TAX repeatedly days before the election if they intended to price carbon by any mechanism and did not mean a word they said? Gillard's no carbon tax ads gave the impression they were shelving their carbon pricing policies - at least for this term.
Many people don't read the fine print on political sites. They take the publicised ads to represent each party's major policies. I wonder if Gillard would have even got 72 seats if she had been honest about her plans to price carbon before the election instead of broadcasting something she clearly didn't mean at all?
Surely, it's not that hard to see what you are missing? The majority of voters can see it very clearly...
I found this article (day before the election) titled "Julia Gillard's Carbon Price Promise"
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...on-price-promise/story-fn59niix-1225907522983
While any carbon price would not be triggered until after the 2013 election, Ms Gillard would have two potential legislative partners next term - the Coalition or the Greens. She would legislate the carbon price next term if sufficient consensus existed.
I have trouble seeing the Coalition as a credible alternative at the present time, but, as always, it's a choice between the alternatives on the table.I am having a very hard time looking at Abbott as a credible leader.
I have trouble seeing the Coalition as a credible alternative at the present time, but, as always, it's a choice between the alternatives on the table.
Hopefully there will be some visible improve as we move closer to the election.
Why is timing so important, though? The policy (of some sort) was inevitable under both parties IMO, it is just that Labour were the one to put it into action. I believe the Liberal party would have done the same, and if this happened, it would be Labour slamming it. Unfortunately this is the nature of oppositional political systems, it isn't so much about developing policy, but more about developing policy that has the least likelihood of being slammed by the opposition's word games.A problem for serial liars is the more they twist and turn, the deeper is the hole they dig for themselves.
The electorate will slaughter Labor at the next election on this point alone.
Probably correct - I should preface my previous comment with that. Certainly becomes more probable in a hypothetical post-2013 term though. But we will never know now.The Coalition would not have introduced a carbon tax in this term had it won the 2010 election.
To suggest otherwise is fantasy.
I am hoping the team behind them will be able to make the inroads to change. I don't want Abbott being some kind of factional dictator style PM as Rudd or Gillard have been. Abbott still leaves a very bitter taste.
Libs policy on small business has my vote though. That and the lack of union interference in policy.
What happens post-2013 depends on a number of factors, but at this stage I would be backing an Abbott led coalition trying to repeal it. Regardless of whether or not a carbon price floats long term, the electorate is left with the bitter taste of Labor's words during the 2010 election campaign and its subsequent actions. That's a taste the electorate will be very keen to remove when it gets a chance at the polls.Probably correct - I should preface my previous comment with that. Certainly becomes more probable in a hypothetical post-2013 term though. But we will never know now.
The Coalition is setting itself up to have to provide answers in a lot of policy areas as we move closer to the election.IR policy will be the litmus test for Abbott, and on this issue he is running scared - with no answers.
...The difference is that Howard took the GST to an election.
+1. Offset, sadly, by his ridiculous maternity leave scheme.Libs policy on small business has my vote though. That and the lack of union interference in policy.
You are ignoring a fundamental point which is that when the Libs floated the notion of any sort of carbon abatement scheme it was at the time when the world focus on so called anthropogenic climate change was at its zenith. Then came Copenhagen and it all fell in a heap. The interest by governments and people since then has continued to slide, so that - as I'm quite sure you know - Australia has introduced a carbon tax at a ridiculously high level in an global atmosphere of complete rejection of any sort of global scheme. Australia is thus, as you will also well know, thus considerably disadvantaged in competitive terms.Why is timing so important, though? The policy (of some sort) was inevitable under both parties IMO, it is just that Labour were the one to put it into action. I believe the Liberal party would have done the same, and if this happened, it would be Labour slamming it.
+1. Offset, sadly, by his ridiculous maternity leave scheme.
.
You do realise that that clip of Gillard is cut off mid-sentence right?
Absolutely hilarious that people are still posting something that has been taken completely out of context.
Some of the psychological studies of this kind of thing are pretty fascinating. That's probably where my interest in politics lies... the core of perception and how different people read different things into it all. The shadows on Plato's cave live on.Vespuria - you should also know that when it comes to politics, it doesn't matter if it's cut off mid-sentence, 1/4 sentence, 3/4 sentence - it's what she said on National TV, at that particular moment in time, that will stick in the minds of the general public come election time.
Average Joe doesn't care about this or that policy. They watch Channel 7/9 news, Desperate Housewives/The Block, Home & Away and see Gillard tell a lie.
*Edit*
A good example of this was the GST 'Cake Question'
Where is Julia Gillard this week
They say she has taken a well earned break.
Is it not a bit unusual for a Prime Minister to have a holiday mid year?
Maybe it is too hot in the kitchen.
Where is Julia Gillard this week
They say she has taken a well earned break.
Is it not a bit unusual for a Prime Minister to have a holiday mid year?
Maybe it is too hot in the kitchen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?