Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
They get voted in because the electorate is utterly fed up with both major parties., how a useless pieces of ###### like him and Wilkie get voted in completely beats me.
They get voted in because the electorate is utterly fed up with both major parties.
The people who voted in Oakeshott and Windsor would have had no conception of how their chosen candidate would sell them out.
Julia Gillard is busily trying to recoup some votes in Queensland with the awarding of the next G20 meeting to Brisbane. Good to see Can-do Newman has ensured the federal government will be paying for most of it.
If Ms Gillard thinks this bit of largesse to a State which utterly detests her will change her fortunes, she is seriously underestimating Queenslanders.
So, did she do her homework or was it a political decision to prop up her seats in Queensland? Now she has the BLUES off side.
”Cr Doyle said he had spoken with former Toronto mayor David Miller, who told him his city needed to employ an additional 20,000 police and security personnel when the Canadian city hosted the G20 in 2010.
“He said to me: 'For God's sake don't get this conference',” Cr Doyle said.
“He said, for him, it was a nightmare for Toronto. They made over 1000 arrests, they had this group called Black Bloc, who were professional protesters who flew in from around the world to disrupt this conference.
“They had four or six police cars set on fire.
"David said: 'This is the conference you do not want'.
The G20 is Gillard's way to punish Brisbane for nurturing Rudd. Melbourne's Mayor is thankful Melbourne didn't get the nod.
”
Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/protesters-will-be-waiting-for-g20-20120711-
Thought the same ....almost.......why would you want the G20 its just a major drama from start to finish.
And 2067 years ago...
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt.
People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."
- Cicero - 55 BC
Opposition Leader Tony Abbott constantly accuses the Prime Minister of 'lying' when she made a commitment before the last election not to introduce a tax on carbon. But who's the liar here?
A lie is when you say something is true when you know it is not true. This is quite different from a commitment, which is a promise to do something in the future.
We can be absolutely certain that Abbott, as a former student in a Catholic seminary, knows the substantive and moral difference between a lie and a commitment.
So when Abbott says the Prime Minister told a lie, he is saying something is true when he knows it is not true, so Abbott is telling a lie. Whereas the most the Prime Minister can be truthfully accused of is breaking a pre-election commitment, like John Howard with the GST and ''core and non-core promises'', or Ted Baillieu with Victorian teachers' salaries.
When I was at secondary school, my English class studied a collection of essays, one of which analysed the methods of Nazi propaganda in the 1930s.
There were, I recall, three components of this: an element of truth; gross exaggeration; and constant repetition.
I have been starkly reminded of this trilogy by the habitual behaviour of Abbott and his opposition colleagues during the past 15 months.
The elements of truth the opposition is exploiting are, first, that the Prime Minister did make an (implicitly qualified) commitment before the last election not to introduce a tax on carbon; and second, that she has indeed had legislation passed putting a price on carbon as an interim measure, before a future carbon-trading scheme is introduced a few years down the track.
Abbott's exaggerations of these basic facts are distortions of the real situation.
As we have seen, and as he well knows, a broken commitment is not a ''lie''.
Ironically, Abbott calling what Australia's Prime Minister said a ''lie'' may itself be an example of what Adolf Hitler called a ''big lie'', that is a lie so ''colossal'' it has a ''certain force of credibility'' because the populace ''would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously'' (Mein Kampf, volume I, chapter X).
Taxing the truth: why we must not let Abbott's dogmas lie
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/po...-dogmas-lie-20120706-21mlz.html#ixzz20TyVIgrP
If he's one of Labor's political advisors, it would explain why they're doing so well in the polls.Taxing the truth: why we must not let Abbott's dogmas lie
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/po...-dogmas-lie-20120706-21mlz.html#ixzz20TyVIgrP
In an election-eve interview with The Australian, the Prime Minister revealed she would view victory tomorrow as a mandate for a carbon price, provided the community was ready for this step.
"I don't rule out the possibility of legislating a Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, a market-based mechanism," she said of the next parliament. "I rule out a carbon tax."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?