- Joined
- 2 July 2008
- Posts
- 7,102
- Reactions
- 6
It probably seemed like good idea at the time.
The Gillard Government
- Thread starter Calliope
- Start date
- Joined
- 28 October 2008
- Posts
- 8,609
- Reactions
- 39
Political cartoon of the year.
- Joined
- 6 September 2008
- Posts
- 7,676
- Reactions
- 68
Bill Shorten on 7:30, a mummy's boy if ever there was one, a complete dud.
Stephen Conroy on TV today, a borderline simpleton,
The Gillard Labor front bench are collectively the most shockingly inadequate bunch of witless buffoons I've ever seen.
Stephen Conroy on TV today, a borderline simpleton,
The Gillard Labor front bench are collectively the most shockingly inadequate bunch of witless buffoons I've ever seen.
- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 850
Your being too kind.
(Its amazing how in one point in history that a government has so many "witless buffoons")
- Joined
- 16 June 2005
- Posts
- 4,281
- Reactions
- 6
Posted this in the wrong thread - meant to post it here:
Here's a video of Bill Shorten who says he supports the PM's comments on Peter Slipper, but doesn't know what they are:
http://video.news.com.au/2227300814/Shorten-supports-PM-on-Slipper?area=videoindex1
- Joined
- 7 April 2010
- Posts
- 972
- Reactions
- 106
That was a classic wasn't it! (why isn't there a 'LOL' smiley?
). He really got caught out there, this government is falling apart at the seams.
- Joined
- 28 October 2008
- Posts
- 8,609
- Reactions
- 39
Good heavens.
That's a shocker.
He could have least done his homework before going to that interview. The dog must have ate it.
The interviewer said fair enough at the end. That's even worse.
- Joined
- 7 April 2010
- Posts
- 972
- Reactions
- 106
Maybe he was in shock.
Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
This comes on top of his embarrassing assertion that the RBA meets on every second Tuesday of the month, rather than the first Tuesday, something he even repeated in the same interview.
Perhaps it's a sign of the stress government members are under.
So much for the future Prime Minister!
Perhaps it's a sign of the stress government members are under.
So much for the future Prime Minister!
- Joined
- 7 April 2010
- Posts
- 972
- Reactions
- 106
And I thought it was just Bob Brown that was losing his marbles....
- Joined
- 6 September 2008
- Posts
- 7,676
- Reactions
- 68
Does anyone else sense an impending collapse of the Gillard Govt ?
- Joined
- 16 June 2005
- Posts
- 4,281
- Reactions
- 6
Here is what Shorten said AFTER mocking Abbott's mistake:
LOL...
for you Miss Hale...If Shorten wasn't so hell bent on his fixation with Abbott, he likely wouldn't have made such a fool of himself!
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2012/s3488236.htm
- Joined
- 16 June 2005
- Posts
- 4,281
- Reactions
- 6
Can only hope, MrBurns...
- Joined
- 7 April 2010
- Posts
- 972
- Reactions
- 106
They way they aired their dirty linen during the Rudd challenge convinced me that they are hanging on by a thread and could implode from internal ructions at any moment.
- Joined
- 6 September 2008
- Posts
- 7,676
- Reactions
- 68
I think that moment is almost upon them, the media will give Shorten hell over is gaff tonight and the RBA gaff then add on Slipper, it's all spiraling out of control or so it seems.
Yes! Many do!
However it is very difficult to put a time frame to it!!
As witnessed many times before, Gillard is a real battler!!!
One would think the report of FWA has the answers, but it appears to be under a "collapsed scrum."
The administrator now has the say if it will be released.
One wonders who will be behind the appointment of that person.
joea
- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 850
I table a Motion of no Confidence in this Prime Minister and the Labor Government.
- Joined
- 6 September 2008
- Posts
- 7,676
- Reactions
- 68
+22,000,000
- Joined
- 2 July 2008
- Posts
- 7,102
- Reactions
- 6
It's not surprising that these two ratbags are so arrogant. They know that they have Gillard by the short and curlies. They hold the labor government's future in their hands.
- Joined
- 25 November 2009
- Posts
- 353
- Reactions
- 1
I didn't take much notice when this little snippet of news came across my screen, but was Thomson one of the 31 Rudd votes in the February leadership vote?
That surely had to be a shot across the bow of the "good ship Gillard"?
No one in the Labor Caucus would have believed Rudd would have even been close but if Thomson were saying to Gillard: "You fail to pre-select me for Dobell and I'm outta here", then he would do it by being one of the 31 votes?
That surely had to be a shot across the bow of the "good ship Gillard"?
No one in the Labor Caucus would have believed Rudd would have even been close but if Thomson were saying to Gillard: "You fail to pre-select me for Dobell and I'm outta here", then he would do it by being one of the 31 votes?
