This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The Gillard Government

On the bigger issues

By Paul Kelly

GILLARD Labor has sensibly decided to support a bigger American presence.


http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...o-strident-china/story-e6frg6zo-1225950377275
 
Great illustration, Boggo. Maybe forward it to the Greens et al?


I guess the important thing is that it doesn't really matter what the overall government is doing.
It doesn't matter what the government is doing?????
 
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1408591/Koreans-mistake-Gillard-for-Austrian
Koreans mistake Gillard for Austrian 11 November 2010

It appears something has been lost in translation at the G20 summit in South Korea.

In a quirky tribute to its powerful guests, the host nation has crafted a set of dolls in the likeness of world leaders.

However, Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard appears to have been mistakenly depicted as an Austrian.

She might be holding the correct flag, but Ms Gillard's red and white puff-sleeved dress and pink apron is distinctly reminiscent of the traditional Austrian tracht.

The dolls are being displayed on a river float in Seoul, ahead of the two-day G20 summit which starts on Thursday.

Picture under: Julia Gillard appears to be wearing the traditional Austrian and Bavarian tracht outfit (AAP)
 

Attachments

  • Gillard_Korean_doll.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 151
Rudd must be laughing his head off. But if he had been there, there is no guarantee that he wouldn't have been dressed like this;
 

Attachments

  • 3427236_f520.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 32
Great illustration, Boggo. Maybe forward it to the Greens et al?
The Greens wouldn't be happy until it was 25% average, lights out at 8:30pm and a diet of hardcore raw veganism.

EDIT: That should read candles out at 8:30pm.

 
^^^ Haha, far right supporters actually believe this resembles "valid commentary"
 
I was wondering why the Aussie PM is the only one with a tilted flag , and of all things she's tilting it to her right, although to our left. In symbolic terms, in't that the truth. But they got the colours right.
 
HO HO HO ..... Merry Christmas Taxpayers Rejoice !

"The massive turnover of staff and the $5.4 million cost to the Australian taxpayer is a direct consequence of a Labor Government that has lost control of itself and of the government. A total cost of nearly $7 million is another example of a Labor Government out of control."

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/national/cou...rs/story-e6frfkvr-1225952377660#ixzz152PIJTOs
 
^^^ Haha, far right supporters actually believe this resembles "valid commentary"

Where does this "far right" thing come from. I don't see any fascists around here.
 

TP, $7 million is 'PEANUTS' to the Labor Party. They believe money grows on trees. You know the one they call the mineral tree.
Yes, they are out of control and the sooner they go the better it will be for all.
 
TP, $7 million is 'PEANUTS' to the Labor Party. They believe money grows on trees. You know the one they call the mineral tree.
Yes, they are out of control and the sooner they go the better it will be for all.

I sometimes wonder if the labor government is deliberately trying to leave an awful mess in the event the libs win government at some stage.

Maybe in the hope that voters won't like the pain caused by bringing the budget and other issues back under control.

It is a worry as to how much damage this government can do should they remain in power for the full term.
 

sails, it's history repeating itself over and over again. The Labor Party are notorious for bad economic managment.
 
As crook as this government is, that generalisation is perhaps a little extreme.
 
Hi.
Because we live in a democracy, and the labour government is in power, its basically a wait and see period on how they go.
Firstly we have accept they won the right to govern. That's a fact.
We will soon see how capable they are.
My personal opinion is that Wayne Swan could not organise, or balance a church fete.
But thats not the point. 50% of the people think he can.

So no matter how many times we quote the media etc. Gillard is running Australia.

What we have to accept is, that in Australia we have the opportunty to express ourselves as does the media.

What Australians have to do, is ensure that at the first opportunity that we have a government that we are cofident with.

The coming state elections will show the current opinion of the Australian
people.

We have been conned, but thats the nature of politics.

Cheers
 

joea, I can only agree with you, but nevertheless, this government must be exposed for all their wrong doings on a regular basis otherwise they will endeavour to make voters believe they are doing a great job. This is where a good opposition should be on the ball daily.
 
Hi.
Because we live in a democracy, and the labour government is in power, its basically a wait and see period on how they go.
Firstly we have accept they won the right to govern. That's a fact.
Yes they have, but not by an outright majority by any means.
They are in power simply because the Independents who were able to decide who became government had old scores to settle with the National Party.
Not at all because they had any genuine faith in the competence of the Labor Party.

We will soon see how capable they are.
Their incompetence is already apparent.

My personal opinion is that Wayne Swan could not organise, or balance a church fete.
But thats not the point. 50% of the people think he can.
As above, that's simply not true. The Coalition won the primary vote.

The coming state elections will show the current opinion of the Australian
people.
To some extent, perhaps, but the State vote will have much to do with local State issues. All the State Labor governments seem to have been on the nose for some time. The reason they've been there for as long as they have has more to do with incompetent and stupid Oppositions, than any belief by the electorate that they are actually doing a decent job.

We have been conned, but thats the nature of politics.
This is a really interesting allegation. Have we actually been conned?
From a purely personal point of view (and I know plenty who feel the same), I don't feel I've been conned by anyone. I voted for whom I considered to be the least worst option. Never at any stage had any belief that any of the options would provide decent government. I suspect much of the electorate felt similarly.

Hence the considerable movement to the Greens who at least appear to stand for something.
Now if the media would just apply the same blow torch to the Greens' policies and ask them for the same level of explanations that they do with the two major parties, some of that default to Greens vote would fall away, as people understand their policies are not costed (or if they are the budget would blow out beyond belief), and that their 'feel good' environmental stuff masks a heavily socialist agenda.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...