Value Collector
Have courage, and be kind.
- Joined
- 13 January 2014
- Posts
- 12,237
- Reactions
- 8,484
with a Tesla, if you have to drive more than the 350km or 400km range, you just pull into a super charger for 20mins and then keep going, and the next generation of super chargers is going to be even less time.
You can actually drive Brisbane to Melbourne in a Tesla using the super charger network. But for most people beginning every day with a full battery they charged at home means they have more than enough power.
Super Charging, Brisbane to Melbourne
This Company is converting ordinary light posts to electric vehicle charge points, and bills customers monthly to their account.
Sure and once everyone gets hooked on electric cars, watch the power prices sky-rocket.
People will still need the grid to take their excess supply during the day, and meet their demand at night.
The grid connection is much cheaper and more versatile than going off grid with batteries, even if the price of batteries comes down by a lot, a home battery pack and solar would struggle to supply enough energy during winter (especially when charging a car) and not have enough capacity to store all the power generated if you were away for a few days
Hydrogen fuel cells can't compete with full electric vehicles.
electricity is the perfect fuel, it can be generated through so many means, and is available every where.
As I pointed out, demand for electrical energy is going to increase, not reduce.This will require Governments and or energy retailers, to increase service charges more and more, as usage reduces.
As I pointed out, demand for electrical energy is going to increase, not reduce.
listen to what he says at the 3.50 mark, basically agreeing with me.
listen to what he says at the 3.50 mark, basically agreeing with me.
Hydrogen fuel cells are to late to the game, full electric has leap frogged them.
For sure, but say the tesla trucks for example they will be charging at large hubs in industrial areas. If driverless car networks take off they will all be getting charged at a hub somewhere. Who knows in the future you may call uber to come and charge your house??
And where will these "hubs" be getting their power from?
TBH not sure where grid owners make their $$$ so there is still probably money to be made.
For residential, as long as connecting to the grid is cheaper than what average person could sell back to the grid per year everyone will stay connected. If that changes there may be a lot of unused infrastructure in the future
After that a move away from Natural gas for household heating, hot water and cooking might follow, moving more household energy demand to electricity.
Electricity is going to take over most forms of energy use eventually, and production will be more and more spread out, the grid is here to stay.
Power prices are regulated,
They may be now, but if some IPA influenced Right wing looney removes that restriction, the prices will rise dramatically.
The question now is how on earth do we fix the mess?
And what do we do about the broader economic and social impacts of the recent price hikes which have turned prices in SA in particular from "way too high" to "outright insane"?
With household prices from the privately owned, "competitive" and "efficient" electricity system in South Australia now almost literally double those charged by the state owned "monopoly" in Tasmania I think it's pretty clear who was wrong and who was right in the great privatisation debate.
It's to the point that running an off-peak water heater in Adelaide is now in fact more expensive than paying full peak rate in Hobart. That's just ridiculous and whilst the cost advantage of hydro-electric generation in Tas does help it's by no means the full story here. Back in the ETSA days SA's power industry was clearly more economically efficient than it is today.
The question now is how on earth do we fix the mess?
And what do we do about the broader economic and social impacts of the recent price hikes which have turned prices in SA in particular from "way too high" to "outright insane"?
In your opinion what is the problem in SA? is the Generation side or the distribution side of the equation?
From my understanding SA has been let down on the generation side, which is somewhat political, e.g. No company is going to make big investments into long payback cycle fossil fuel generation (e.g. coal) because they don't know how the government will tax them in 5 years time and funding is difficult because of environmental groups pressuring the banks to deny credit.
So SA went instead with more expensive renewables, which proved unreliable and cause spikes in spot electricity prices, which off course need to be factored in to the retail price.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?