This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.


Interesting article (3 full page) in the AFR Weekend 21 December, 2013 by Matthew Cranston and Rebecca Thistleton.

Some of the content : -



Juwai.com, which calls itself the largest Chinese international property portal, estimates 63.1 million Chinese have the wealth to invest in overseas property and 90 million Chinese search for property every month.


Agent John McGrath describes the Chinese money as the biggest surge from an offshore market he has seen in his 30 years in real estate. He says in some suburbs, 90 per cent of new product is selling to Chinese buyers.

“Our [real estate] market is the Chinese market, just like coal and iron ore,” *Triguboff famously says of the Chinese buyers. (*billionaire Harry Triguboff of Meriton).

Colliers International’s Andrew Scriven says the Chinese money is flowing in everywhere, not just the main cities.



 
Quincy, I went back to your post of September regarding a similar artice to what you posted today and I am replying to ROE's post below where he addressed his concerns.

I agree with ROE, what a terrible high risk proposition. I would never ever hand over even $100 let alone $1 Million to a friend who may be a permanent resident of another country for them to invest on my behalf. You have no control and they can swipe the money by selling the house anytime they like.

The people who gave them the money in good faith wouldn't even know their property was sold and the "friend" could well be living on the otherside of the world by the time they found out. Bloody crazy if you asked me, too much risk and if they are foolish enough to make such an investment then they must bear all the losses too. That's what I call gambling, not investing.


 

Please explain to us now how this is not the case, given the recent huge increases in Sydney exactly how is it not a tool of oppression ?

You don't create wealth with property you out right steal it from others.
 
Please explain to us now how this is not the case, given the recent huge increases in Sydney exactly how is it not a tool of oppression ?

You don't create wealth with property you out right steal it from others.

He just did read above!

How you doin Cliff!
 

Interesting. So someone like myself looking at buying my first home (24, Male) should wait until rates return to pre GFC levels as that is when average house prices will be at their lowest?

My plan of attack was originally to buy NOW and pay off the mortgage QUICKLY (5 - 7 yrs) but it seems like the wise option would be to rent with friends for the time being and build capital and pounce when the rates are high and the home prices low and pay off the mortgage even quicker.

What kind of time frame are we looking at in regards to rates returning back to their highs?
 

Attachments

  • gutBcQY.jpg
    25.9 KB · Views: 0
What kind of time frame are we looking at in regards to rates returning back to their highs?

I'm thinking rates will be low for quite a bit longer with the way unemployment is increasing even while the participation rate is falling.

I'm not sure what the threshold for unemployment is before it starts to afect house prices, but the only thing that will keep house prices from falling is the reported foreign buyers, but then China is going through their own slow down so maybe that money will start drying up too??

Why buy when u can rent for and let the tax payer subsidise your living costs. Council rates water rates insurance all add up quickly, strata fees too for an apartment.

Just rent and save the difference compared to a mortgage in super or bonds / shares / hybrids. They'll al pretty much generate a better return than housing. Heck, I'm looking at an annualised return over 10% with hybrids for the last 6 months with no debt worries.
 

As long as you can save faster then what the house prices are growing then keep renting and saving.

As soon as that changes buy a house, because then you are getting behind everyday.
 
As long as you can save faster then what the house prices are growing then keep renting and saving.

As soon as that changes buy a house, because then you are getting behind everyday.

It would be extremely difficult to keep up with property over the longer term unless you are gearing into investments too (and that can be difficult as banks charge more for eg margin loans) People probably make most money from property not on their principal, but due to the fact that they are gearing, often heavily (and I would say stupidly at the peaks)

MW

But don't ask me, ask Robots
 
Finally we get some clear information as to what property prices are really doing. The ABS are publishing 'House Price Indexes'. It won't be distorted or massaged by self interested Real Estate Agents any more.
 
As long as you can save faster then what the house prices are growing then keep renting and saving.

As soon as that changes buy a house, because then you are getting behind everyday.

http://www.smh.com.au/business/property/australian-capital-city-house-prices-rise-10-in-2013-20140102-306tk.html

Sydney recorded the strongest yearly growth across the capital cities, with an annual rate of 14.5 per cent in 2013.

If you can save 40k a year (for a cheap unit in Sydney[400k unit]), then keep saving...if not...

Actually, l'm about to off-load some properties. Need capital for a business venture, so please don't take any of my advice.
 

IMO good move danny, the amount of housing and infill development in Perth, is scary.

But like I said, IMO, and it isn't worth anything.lol
 

I think you are suffering from "Poor Me Syndrome",

What do you mean "Most aussies can't buy property over seas", are you saying that there is only a special class of aussie that can buy property over seas.

I think you need to get your facts straight, Australian companies own property, businesses, mining rights and infrastructure all over the world. I even know private individuals who hold farm land over seas and realestate investments over seas.
 
552 posts and Robots is still right, crack me up.
 
Listening to a real estate segment on ABC radio this morning, residential property sales in Perth have taken off but at the same time,


http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...-cut-speculation/story-e6frg926-1226803161706

Month to month job figures can be lumpy but it remains a tightrope for the RBA between encouraging employment growth and preventing a real estate asset bubble.
 

This might sound like a crazy idea, but if l were in Gov, l'd scrap 'unemployment benefits' altogether. They are trying to build a super massive national infrastructure project (aka - NBN).

Want a job? You got one....work for NBN Co. (Didn't the 'Snowy Mountains Hydro Scheme run for 25 years?)


Provide training and experience. Have a sub 1% unemployment rate. Save money and give people skill in a technology sector which will grow for, well, pretty much forever...
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...