Points are fair, but what people fail to realise that all professions are required to do work which is not paid for, such as continuing education, and also registration fees, professional indemnity, amongst other things.
These same people are not fortunate enough to be able to set themselves up as a company, and hence do not reap the benefits of tax deductability on items used for personal use such as
mobile phones, fuel, V8 utes, clothing, home improvements.
I have brought this up on multiple occassions and have failed to EVER have an ASF self-employed tradesperson admit what is the hourly rate, call-out fees etc which they charge.
I have, however just recently seen that pay rates for electricians and plumbers are over $100 per hour ( in a newspaper over the last month or so ) How does this compare to other jobs, I mean ones that have not had their wages propped up by the first home vendors boost.
Tradies and unions have a lot to thank Krudd for..... oh and the naivity of the general public.
My point was very much about supply and demand. Physical work (hard yakka) is easier to learn than a profession hence there will be more underlying supply. Demand/supply imbalances can occur but they are just that, imbalances.the free market sets the prices should never be set by how much study you have to do, it should be set by the supply and demand of that trade, If there is a shortage of skilled labour then tradesman can be picky about which jobs they wish to take and ask for higher prices, This should then encourage more into that trade which should over time raise the supply to where the tradesmen have to fight a bit hard for jobs and this should lower prices.
However if a trade is genuinely such hard yakka that even big pay cheaques don't encourage more people to enter the trade, then it probally means that the ones who are prepared to do the job deserve the larger pay off.
My point was very much about supply and demand. Physical work (hard yakka) is easier to learn than a profession hence there will be more underlying supply. Demand/supply imbalances can occur but they are just that, imbalances.
Long term the remuneration of tradesman cannot be higher than that of professionals as this is a flawed hierarchy.Our society now is very swayed to obtaining higher education and due to this the "value" of doing a trade is lost to the perception that it is beneath ones station after obtaining uni ,tafe, qualifications. We are becoming an older country(ageing population) and this has been the case for ove a decade now so the supply/demand "imbalance" seems to becoming the norm , not just a tempoary "imbalance.
Long term the remuneration of tradesman cannot be higher than that of professionals as this is a flawed hierarchy.
Consider for example the construction of a bridge (or any structure). There are professionals (engineers) who design the structure and the tradies who build it. If the bridge builders get paid more than the engineers then obviously the smarter people will gravitate towards building the bridge. Any structure is only as good as it's design regardless of who builds it so the implications here are obvious.
Changing demographics can alter supply/demand balance but this too would only present a temporary departure from the above equilibrium (that is an equilibrium that continues to foster the growth of our civilisation).
I suspect that our perception of economic well being has been a stronger factor in the current supply/demand situation for tradies. Who wants to do crap work (what most people consider to be crap work) when we can pay someone else to do it ?
The problem is that a considerable portion of this attitude has been financed by debt and the fall out will most likely be a shorter term influence than changing demographics.
No one though can realistically blame tradies for taking advantage of a supply/demand relationship in their favour. Tradies though would be well advised to think of themselves like a farmer that is harvesting a bumper crop and squirrel some of the proceeds away in case of leaner times.
Just wan't to say thanks to tysonboss 1 , nun and all the others for putting their views on this subject re the trades. supply and demand in a nutshell is it,stimulus or not. soft d forgets that what he hates about the pesant un uni workforce is that they have made his Sydney home (example only) double over the last ten years (prob more) due to the Howard/ Rudd factor and their labour. soft d hope you don't choke on you "grange" and the supply of cavair is nice and constant for you.
Are you still harping on about this. Your problem is you just don't like the idea that tradies are not slave labor. The $100 per hour does not go in your pocket; it is to cover business expenses. You can not make improvements to your home apart from the labor or your house gets tied in as part of the business if you get sued. Clothingyeah because stubbies and hard yakka shirts are awesome to wear everywhere. That $100 an hour has to cover Workers comp, public liability, phone ,safety costs, advertising , car running costs, tools, electricity and other related business expenses, plus the costs of further training. Also the fact that work is not consistent through the year but the bills are.
Business money and personal money are two different things.
And don't feed me the BS that trades are rolling in money I know plenty that are highly skilled and only make the base. They take a risk working on job sites; they can be injured, fined up to $250k and even charged with workplace manslaughter which is not a factor for the majority of wage slaves. The ones that are rich employ a lot of people and take on the bigger jobs. But a lot of jobs fall over the main contractor goes bust and you lose your house or are instantly bankrupted.
So you don't take a risk on business to make less than wages
Comparing trades to doctors c’mon at least tradies fix the problems:
Professionals can set themselves up as companies and claim phone, internet or whatever their business may use.
Tradies over paidyeah that’s why there is a current shortage.
You could have got a cheaper quote.
Hear hear! I was going to write a similar post but Tysonboss1 has summed it up pretty well IMO.
I don't know where you find GPs that only charge $30 per consult that also only do 4 consults an hour? In Sydney, if you can even find a bulk billing GP, they would do at least 8 consults an hour or more and so earn more like double what you are suggesting. However, most GPs in this town charge $65-$80 a consult (and we pay the difference between medicare rebate and their charge), and so all earn considerably more than you are estimating. I have never met a poor doctor. I won't even mention my 2 friends (married couple) who are both neurologists and the HUGE amounts they earn - but that's because I think they deserve every cent of it!
Cheers,
Beej
I also use an extreme example, comparing one of the most elite groups, where only a small proportion of individuals can actually qualify for and complete the training with an occupation where majority of the population would be able to do the training to become qualified ( and this is not being disrespectful, just stating it as a fact )
But it doesn't come down to the percentage of the population that are "capable" of doing the training and taking up the profession, What counts is how many people Actually do the training and take up the profession compared to the amount of people willing to pay for their services.
What also counts is the number of 1st year apprentices that are kicked out and replaced by another 1st year apprentice by the tradie simply to keep paying lower wages.What counts is how many people Actually do the training and take up the profession compared to the amount of people willing to pay for their services.
By the way I think medicare is a massive subsidy for the health care practitioners.
What has all this got to do with "the future of Australian property prices"???
Try to keep to the thread please.
What has all this got to do with "the future of Australian property prices"???
Try to keep to the thread please.
If being self employed as a tradesman is not an attractive proposition, can you please then explain why a disproportionate number of tradesmen are self-employed and not wage earners.
That 250k is for maximum work cover fines for a major safety breach, not being sued.I fail to see the arguments for eg being done for $250k for mistakes. Are you aware of the many professionals ( especially in health ) who can be taken for considerably more and who don't have the ability to amortise the costs as effectively since they are wage earners.
1. House being taken... pty ltd anyone? Obviously you have never owned a company before.
2. Business expenses are minimal eg electricity??? huh how much electricity does a tradesperson pay for when the use on the site power. Tools are one off set up expenses. Phone, car, clothing are often rorted for personal use, as are some input materials etc for self work.
Ok I'll break it up
Because it costs too much(plus excess book work) for the main contractor to put you on wages. The workers comp alone for a decent wage is up to and over $9k on $60k wages add super and taxes and it's easier to just hire subbies.
So the majority of the time unless you have an abn then you don't get work. Oh and the going rate for a lot of tradies in this situation is $35 an hour.
Dont forget the long service leave levy and payroll tax
Oh I've never run a companyObviously someone hasn't
Umm this is where you’re talking out your A$$. The house often goes up as security for material accounts even if it’s in your wife’s name
And if you start mixing business with personal assets you lose the personal assets.
Eg: I buy material and use it on the house, or pay tradies from the company to fix up the house. I then go bankrupt over a bad debt. They will link it and deem the house up for grabs. I know this because my friend got done in this exact manner. You keep the business separate from personal assets.
Agreed no way out if you give a directors guarantee
What are we??? Fu*ken hippies that live out of vans. Are you the type of dolt that thinks we run off with a hammer and a ute and get work all day? FFS for someone that has such a concrete idea of how tradies go about business of making money to roll in, your actual business strategy for us is lacking. You are talking about guys on what more or less equates to wages or less because they get stiffed with insurances, gst and their own book work. There is a long list of expenses exactly the same as any other business. You are also talking about guys that rort the tax system and let me tell you they don't last long. And yes there are a lot of real scum bag trades out there. But a lot are the average business owner with average business problems.
Lot of time and costs quoting
Good luck with prices coming down. There is a whole safety industry full of bureaucratic BS leaching off us. These are the ex union guys, ex pollies and a host of others that happily make life more costly for you. It increases costs and time spent on the job and it's not going away. As a tradie you get wrapped up in that much red tape from unions or workcover that it's amazing any work gets done. The latest thing seems to be training courses you have to participate in if you want to work in certain conditions (eg: at heights, tagging elec tools, ewp and so on).
and the inductions for every body that has an ego problem and doesn't think you've been trained or learnt anything in your apprenticeship
and unlike the medical profession your supposed to actually finish the job succesfully with a guarantee, whereas they ask you to try this and if your stil ill come back next week end try something else
User pays sounds good but only if a successful outcome, Yes all for it
And paying 2k a week rent? or was he lucky enough to bunk down with others ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?