- Joined
- 10 August 2008
- Posts
- 2,136
- Reactions
- 315
Interesting argument and discussion. So why was negative gearing reintroduced when the research showed its removal didn't impact on rent.
"The Hawke Government abolished negative gearing for property in 1985 only to have it reinstated in 1987. During that period rents increased by 57.5% in Sydney, by 38.2% in Perth and by 32.0% in Brisbane. At the same time building approvals fell by 13.8%,"
In 1985 the Hawke Government attempted to try and abolish Negative Gearing. It meant that people taking positive steps to fund their retirement were unable to recoup any losses and were left out in the dark.
As a result, the rental market virtually closed down! Rents soared, and the cost of renting was unachievable. Investors started dumping their properties and we were faced with a social disaster.
SM Junkie,
Do the claims of skyrocketed rent back in 85 only come from the property industry ?
Do you have ABS data that can support your claim ?
I was too young to remember what impact changes to negative gearing had back then but articles I have come across mention that rent was relatively flat after 85 and changes were abolished in 87 due to property industry lobbying.
Just a few sweeping generalizations backed up with no evidence there robots (that fits in with my definition of spam). Since I am a property investor I like property just fine thanks. Yes, the property market is important to the economy, far more important than it should be. Building new houses does provide economic activity but most of the housing finance today is for existing dwellings. Property speculation by investors buying existing property is largely an unproductive activity of very little benefit to the economy, that's the point.stop underestimating the importance of the property market in our economy, most just dont like property so they believe its unproductive ( but really its because they dont earn the $ to buy a home even with how affordable they are)
hello,
HEY HEY HEY HEY:
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vi...he-way-on-houses/story-e6frf7kx-1225979744423
oh well looks as though top still going, oh well
surely its time these office flogs who keep posting were given a holiday and my requirements to post in this thread are introduced ASAP
its just tough having to deal with all the spam that gets posted on this thread throughout the day
oh well Happy New Year
thankyou
Professor Robots No. 1
ps. hang on, i know we going to get a well written post by Explod now which will end with in my view property prices are on the way down
Australian home prices in major cities dipped in November, from October, as
higher mortgage rates took some further heat out of the housing market.
Figures from property consultant RP Data-Rismark showed home prices eased
a seasonally adjusted 0.2 percent in November, from October when they rose 0.3
percent. Prices were still up 5.2 percent on November last year, though that was
slowest pace of annual growth in 17 months.
Home prices outside the major cities dipped by 0.1 percent in November,
compared to October when they rose 0.2 percent. Annual home price growth slowed to
2.4 percent.
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) lifted its cash rate by 25 basis points to
4.75 percent early in November, and the commercial banks raised their mortgage rates
by more.
The central bank has lifted its cash rate by 175 basis points since October
2009 in part to restrain a surge in home prices.
Vicki, have you read of the Demographia survey on housing affordability published last year?Affordable?...What would be considered the average household income p/w? Also, what would be considered the average p&I mortgage payment on say 400k p/w?
When this thread opened bears were highly outnumbered by bulls, seems like the situation has totally reversed now.
If I was to use the posters and their views on this thread as a random sample of the population and their views on Australian property one could come to the conclusion that Au property market is no longer a bull market.
Affordability, rates, clearance rates, living in paradise all make for good speculative points in the overall theory. However it is quiet clear that property has now became a long term play at best for those wanting to make money on it.
A very large number of people who bought into property in the last 1 - 2 years were those that had no clue about the economy, inflation rates etc They bought in on the media hype and word of mouth. Yes just like the market driven by emotional factors.
Once the promise of guaranteed per ann value increase is blown away, more and more current affair stories about struggling Aussies not being able to afford "the dream" the same motivation that made the sheep follow the pack will make them exit with the pack. Scary thought buying on top is a deadly game especially if you are locked in for 30yrs.
Alot of naive fhob are about to get screwed over and get a reality shock. Robot if you bought your ip last year you will not be seeing quick riches anytime soon.
You can sit on anything long enough to see its value rise up again but at what opportunity cost?
You haven't been drinking lates lately, putting money away for the coming rate raises?
So analysing trends and doing statistical and comparative analysis is just a waste of time bots? I recall that the likes of Peter Schiff in the U.S. were scoffed at and derided for declaring the U.S. housing market was a bubble ready to crash using similar analysis only to be proven correct. Those who listened to his and others advice and analysis not only saved themselves "mega coin" but can now repurchase property at a substantial discount and are probably not collecting food stamps or bankrupt.yes look at what the likes of Debtdeflation, Jenman, Demographia and all the other blogs have "COST" people over the past 5yrs, mega coin
hello,
gee that first paragraph is pretty much the reverse of what happened in australia, true visionaries (although not many of them around) alluded to how beautiful australia is and the $ flowed in, amazing
the situation in US is also pretty much as predicted, people woke up to the pathetic joint it is, you need a 9mm just make it out alive from a trip to Walmart, stupidity (go back to 2004 when the original property thread started, another one right)
gee, i need an investment newsletter to sell to all the sheeple hey Explod! no. instead log into ASF for the free advice, helping out fellow man
thankyou
professor robots
And the money will just keep flowing into paradise will it bots? Nothing wrong with affordability or debt, no bubble here. All those foreign investors buying houses here, keeping them empty and counting on endless speculation to keep prices high are true visionaries?gee that first paragraph is pretty much the reverse of what happened in australia, true visionaries (although not many of them around) alluded to how beautiful australia is and the $ flowed in, amazing
Predicted by who bots, those property bears you don't listen to? Your detailed analysis with respect to the U.S. property market is quite thought provoking and balanced! LOL So Hawaii is a "pathetic joint" is it? Clearly you have never been there.the situation in US is also pretty much as predicted, people woke up to the pathetic joint it is, you need a 9mm just make it out alive from a trip to Walmart, stupidity (go back to 2004 when the original property thread started, another one right)
http://www.finnewsnetwork.com.au/Display.aspx?Site=FNN02
First time I can recall hearing someone from RP data acknowledging prices will likely decline or stay stagnant for over a year.
When this thread opened bears were highly outnumbered by bulls, seems like the situation has totally reversed now.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?