Since we can have DNA checks, we won’t need to exonerate anybody, as they will never be sentenced to death in a first place.
We are so hung up against death penalty while thousands of innocent lives are snuffed out in road fatalities and we live with it, just bad luck.
Going back to death penalty, I assume that we would do everything we can to make sure that no innocent life is taken.
When guilt is not clear no death sentence, but when more than clear then no long term accommodation just exit.
Of course even with all the safeguards somebody is innocently executed, well tough luck, that person can always be exonerated.
No justice system is perfect , mistakes get made, innocent people confess to crimes thay didn't commit etc. The death penalty is final , I rather help fund the unkeep of the guilty for life than take one innocent persons life.
Life should mean Life.
Maybe we should be able to declare in our tax retrurn, that we want to pay higher tax to go toward otherwise death penalty cases or not.
This would make you happy and me happy too.
The justice system is far to open to abuse , they do say that power breeds corruption , so a death penalty which is the omega to any legal arguement is a very unhealthy situation ....... especially if you tread on the wrong persons toes . To give license to it could only be hysteria , to believe that DNA wonderfully given to us by science , is infallable , is sheer lunacy .
To entrust it to our wonderful police and courts is suicidal !
Forth went the thunder-god
riding on his filly,
"I'M THOR!!" he cried!!
His horse replied
"You forgot your thaddle, thilly".
Of course even with all the safeguards somebody is innocently executed, well tough luck, that person can always be exonerated.
I would love to see murderers/serial killers and rapists (if 100% sure) get executed.
There should be a zero tolerance policy in force. If you are caught or admit to guilt, or there is unquestionable evidence against you, then you should be destroyed.
I mean these low lifes who commit these crimes destroy their victims and their families lives.
Why in the hell should they keep their life? I dont believe in this 'it makes you as bad as them' nonsense.
This is the real world. They wouldnt think twice in knocking you off. Some of these people are mentally screwed anyway.
Problem is we are too soft here. You can knock someone off and still only serve 20-25 years. What a bargain! Then I bet once they are released they will do it again.
To those whom are against capital punishment ask yourself this.. if it was your loved one, daughter or son, or any member of your family, would you be satisfied with their killer being able to live the rest of their life in the prison system? Reliving their experience with fellow inmates and boasting about it to any passing member of staff? I know I couldnt
You know what is the worst aspect of this attitude... the guilty person is still free to offend again while people with this attitude celebrate 'an execution' for their own emotional satisfaction.
Well tough luck, you say. The contradiction of this attitude is that you put as little value on human life as a murderer.
I think also it's been shown (yes?) that a jury (in a christian country) is far less likely to find someone guilty if the accused is likely to be subjected to the death penalty.
As for Singapore, Spag, - agree entirely.
I recall they had a "no trespassing sign" on a fence surrounding Changi airport - a sign of a person being shot.
Bit like this sign I guess... (not sure where it is from - found it on the internet)
at least with a picture, the message still has a good chance of getting across - whereas if you're don't speak english, a few squiggles on a sign don't mean that much...
apart from the fact that I agree 100% ith... , I repeat a poem which I found (not original) - which is kinda in keeping with your nicnameFriday afternoon after all
noi,On a second offence they should be shot by firing squad.
Perhaps they could offer voluntary death penalties? Like life in prison in the off shore island or take this pill your choice sort of deal ...
noi,
You're aware I trust that, in the case of firing squads, one man is given a blank.
That way EACH of them can always kid himself that he wasn't involved - that he was the one with the blank -
that way he won't have nightmares as he ages accompanied by the memory of that day.....
Now in reality 5 of the 6 (or whatever) will have been responsible for a bullet hole in another man's chest
but sure - we are good at kidding ourselves
and for the rest of us ? sure - we are good at delegating the grubby stuff to others.
slippery slope there noiHi 2020, It may sound a bit sad but it is best to have people in the firing squad who enjoy their work.
slippery slope there noi
who ya gonna call?
soldiers? police?
I guessing that most soldiers would be reluctant to take part.
Maybe you'd find a few police prepared to volunteer.
(IN EITHER CASE, I bet they secretly hope to get the "blank")
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?