Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,304
- Reactions
- 11,583
bullmarket said:Hi visual
You seem to be ignoring the fact that the autopsy did not find the cause of death and so, in theory at least, maybe it wasn't the electric shock that killed the child.........that is for the jury to decide based on ALL the evidence that is presented in the court and not for you or I or anyone else to decide waffling on in chatrooms making judgements based on what is reported in newspapers which may or may not be factual......and even if it is assumed that the electric shock killed the child, the prosecution then has to prove to the jury that the intent behind the shock was premeditated murder and not something else....which would make the accused guilty of lesser charges.
I still maintain that ANY accused person has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Based solely on the contents of the story you posted, I personally could not convict the accused of murder simply because there are too many unknowns with the main unknown being the cause of death......but I am sure there has been and there will be more evidenced presented to the jury to decide how the child died and if it was murder or not.
cheers
bullmarket
kennas said:Visual,
I'm not saying that the 'criminal' gene can be isolated but genetics predispose us to certain personality traits and intelligence quota. Then we are influenced by society at large. This is common dog.
Certain people are predisposed to turn into criminals because of genes and environment. Neither may be a direct influence, but will absolutely be a factor contributing to someones final actions.
Bullmarket,
I look forward to the outcome of the trial about this lunatic. I think he should have pleaded insanity to get the best result for himself. Did I read correctly that this child was also a boy? Holy ghost Batman, your God certainly created an incedibly warped and demented and peverse human. In His own image mind you! God was a rapist of 3 year old boys??? What omnipotent Being would create such a thing?
kennas said:I agree to disagree Bull.
crackaton said:Eye for an eye tooth for a tooth. Kill and be killed.
Now that was funny.. I always find it amusing when our jargon is construed as derogatory.. 25 years in the Navy, and the wife generally translates for me now as I'm too lazy to explain it to civiies..kennas said:'Common Dog' must be just a military term used to describe an event or situation that everyone knows or understands. I picked this up while serving in the Army. I thought it was a common term that everyone would understand!
bullmarket said:But the basic difference in our views, as I see it, is that you are prepared to convict the accused of murder right here and now and I am not since I firmly believe in everyone's right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty and based solely on the newspaper report (which is dangerous to do at the best of times) for me personally there are too many uncertainties to convict him of murder, but of lesser charges for sure.....ie...the cause of death is uncertain for me atm and the motive behind the electric shock has not been conclusively established atm.
Hopefully during the trial more evidence will be presented to clear up the uncertainties but at this stage I could not come up with a guilty verdict.
and heres proofTHE OTHER THREAD FLOATING AROUND ABOUT WEATHER TO BRING IN THE DEATH PENALTY JUST CHANGED A FEW MINDS I BET...
I think I've just changed my mind about the death penalty.
Nothing else seems appropriate in this instance.
Julia
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?