- Joined
- 10 December 2012
- Posts
- 3,632
- Reactions
- 9
Surprised at no mention of the $80 bil + ship building pork barrel.
Did anyone one else have trouble not throwing up listening to Abbotts comments about his government doing good work making these promises?
Surprised at no mention of the $80 bil + ship building pork barrel.
Did anyone one else have trouble not throwing up listening to Abbotts comments about his government doing good work making these promises?
It is so difficult to win with you lefties.
On the one hand you criticize Abbott for not doing enough for workers in the ship building industry and in the next breath when he does something to make the unions happy in South Australia, you brand him of pork barreling.
Gillard gave the over seas corporate car industry ( not local companies) enough taxpayers money to keep manufacturing cars until 2020, so why are they pulling out so much earlier (2017)?.....It was supposed to keep the small local part suppliers in operation until they could diversify into other products.
RBA lead the Govt to drink the coolaid on the never ending resource boom. The AUD was going to be perpetually high, rivers of revenue were going to flow endlessly.
An artificially high AUD, due in part to the over investment of the resource industry massacred local manufacturing. Maybe not letting 3 LNG trains to be developed at the same time in QLD might have helped. Maybe not allowing the massive mine expansions to go on concurrently would have been good policy, and saved shareholders from the large writedowns they're facing.
Over investment in the electricity networks, along with the lack of a gas reservation policy for domestic users, has meant local industry faces higher energy costs than most of our competitors. You don't get to be so up the effluent creek without a paddle like we are without years and years of poor policy decisions.
Lack of vision by the laberals for over a decade has lead us to the situation where we'll be in the company of NZ as the only rich countries without a local car manufacturing industry.
I'm not sure why we can't afford to invest in rail when there's plenty of funds for the military.
It is so difficult to win with you lefties.
On the one hand you criticize Abbott for not doing enough for workers in the ship building industry and in the next breath when he does something to make the unions happy in South Australia, you brand him of pork barreling.
Gillard gave the over seas corporate car industry ( not local companies) enough taxpayers money to keep manufacturing cars until 2020, so why are they pulling out so much earlier (2017)?.....It was supposed to keep the small local part suppliers in operation until they could diversify into other products.
No believes its about jobs but trying to up the polls anyone that believes Abbott will deliver is a mug.......IMHO
No believes its about jobs but trying to up the polls anyone that believes Abbott will deliver is a mug.......IMHO
No one believes the hachneyed "unions at fault" excuse either. We were one of the richest if not the richest per capita countries with unions of trade workers in the mix starting almost 20 years before we decided we might be able to govern ourselves and make our own fortunes and own mistakes.
Those unions are men and women, not some kind of deity that exists to be the punching bag of wannabe blue bloods and failed businessmen. Successful companies embrace their workforce and include them in the growth strategies and rewards systems..... doomed to fail businesses do battle and invariably their otherwise loyal employees wreak damage on the brand.
Newscorp and it's subsidiary, the LNP, should at least have the guts to to change "unions" to "Australian men and women workers" when they headline the usual blame game for weak management of the country..... no matter which party is wrecking the place at the time.
No one believes the hachneyed "unions at fault" excuse either. We were one of the richest if not the richest per capita countries with unions of trade workers in the mix starting almost 20 years before we decided we might be able to govern ourselves and make our own fortunes and own mistakes.
Those unions are men and women, not some kind of deity that exists to be the punching bag of wannabe blue bloods and failed businessmen. Successful companies embrace their workforce and include them in the growth strategies and rewards systems..... doomed to fail businesses do battle and invariably their otherwise loyal employees wreak damage on the brand.
Newscorp and it's subsidiary, the LNP, should at least have the guts to to change "unions" to "Australian men and women workers" when they headline the usual blame game for weak management of the country..... no matter which party is wrecking the place at the time.
Part of the issue here is that at the local level, much of Australia is basically a Third World economy and has been for years.
WA - Dig it up and ship it out. Classic Third World stuff.
Qld - Same as WA with the addition of tourism. Again that's Third World stuff.
NT - Again, not much more than natural resource exploitation one way or another.
Tas - Mixed in terms of actual activity but government policy has, with the exception of a brief period early this decade, focused heavily on natural resource extraction - that's Third World stuff.
SA - Was a developed economy as such but has fallen in a heap due to the impacts of events in other states plus lack of scale locally.
Which leaves NSW and Vic as the only states that could really be considered as "advanced economies" in terms of actual activity and are managing to do it with enough scale to be useful. I didn't mention ACT since it's a government city in terms of economics and probably always will be. Necessary yes, but it will never likely become a net income earner for Australia.
We have a lot of issues in WA and Qld especially as the mining boom winds down. But that was always inevitable and there's no point blaming unions, environmentalists or anyone else for that outcome, it never could have lasted and so it didn't. The question isn't why has mining investment fallen in a heap? The question is how did we end up with such high reliance upon it in the first place? Economically at least, WA is up there with the likes of Saudi Arabia in terms of a total lack of economic sustainability. Once the iron or oil is gone, that's it, game over. Completely unsustainable and the proverbial blind Freddy could see what's going to happen in the long term.
It's a fairly safe bet that 35 years from now, coal mining in Qld will be an irrelevant activity economically and LNG will be at the end of the line too. Iron ore in WA will be well on the way to being stuffed by then too. Better start planning now for what's inevitable.
PS - no offence intended to anyone living in any particular state. I'm just calling it as I see it - digging stuff up or cutting it down and loading it onto ships with little if any processing is classic Third World stuff. We can't expect to sustain a high standard of living with that approach.
Political point scoring has to stop.
Yes, but it won't, you and I know that.
Government is the big game and both sides want it, and need it for their continued survival. People won't vote for a compliant Opposition that is just a pushover for the Government. That's why Tony Abbott made it his job to oppose everything.
Shorten is more concilliatory, but there has to be points of difference to distinguish one Party from the other, otherwise no one would want to be a politician if they spend their lives on the Opposition benches.
I think the difference here is that Abbott was opposing and trying to curtail Labor's extravaganza spending while Labor is opposing Abbott's savings as in Labor's own commitment to save $6 billion which Labor now opposes.
In this case who has the national interest at heart?
All in all considering that the Noalition haven't really done anything other than stop and or slow down things, NBN, Boats, Funding for almost everything except the deficit etc...why are they doing so badly?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Australian_election_polling_-_two_party_preferred.png
Sure the rorts thing is a negative and the many blunders of Tony - but no game changers or major stuff ups...and yet they are way behind on the 2 party prefered and have been for 20 months and continue to trend lower.
~
Abbott's polling badly, because he's Abbott, the media hate him with a passion.
It will be interesting, come election time, whether the silent majority prefer Abbott or Shorten.
I don't think Abbott can climb out of the hole the left wing ABC media have put him in.
It depends on whether Shorten survives the next grilling at the RC into union corruption.
IMHO I would like to see a change in leadership from Abbott to Morrison before Xmas 2015....I don't think Abbott can climb out of the hole the left wing ABC media have put him in.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?