ASX must have had a glitch in their system today - they recorded all trades between 11:13 and 11:36 at $1.55.
TGA - Thorn Group
- Thread starter McCoy Pauley
- Start date
-
- Tags
- tga thorn group
ASX must have had a glitch in their system today - they recorded all trades between 11:13 and 11:36 at $1.55.
tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,400
- Reactions
- 6,317
Yeh it was on my part a typo.
I was one of the 5 parcels totalling $38500 that went through in that group
at 11.13.
Was $1.54
Your out for duck aren't you.
Which one?
tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,400
- Reactions
- 6,317
Anyone you like.
Your only interested in doing duck.
Trades done I'll manage it here with technical reasoning.
Showed the reasoning BEFORE the trade
Showed the time of trade.
Quantity has no bearing on the trade.
Without glasses 3s look like 8s and 2s look
like 5s.
Start putting in constructive posts on the subject
and get out of your Kahki's.
Those 5 trades you referred to occurred between 11:05 and 11:13. The only trade at 11:13 was for 271 shares.
Can't you find a detailed depth to get your story straight?
Now I’m a trusting sort of guy and would be happy to accept that you are a fat beaked blind duck. But others may think you’ve got a bit of a credibility problem here.
tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,400
- Reactions
- 6,317
Ive said it before.
I'm not here to make friends.
Im here to show the blind ducks of the forum that they dont need to pour through wads of fundamentals and pontificate on their meaning,and or endlessly debate on valuations
They can with experience trade profitably in 10 minutes a day using nothing more than price action/volumes and patterns. Crowd phsycology is there for all to take advantage of.
Now I know it urks a few in the fundamental world that entrails can turn a profit.
Particularly when shown time and time again.
Trades there to see.
Thats enough.
Carry on.
or 11:13 or whatever you now reckon. The point is the trade is not in the course of sales as you say - So do you mean hypothetacilly you got filled?
They are just being nice to you when they say size doesn't matter. It matters a great deal.
tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,400
- Reactions
- 6,317
Would you prefer that?
If so go with it.
You’re a slippery duck
The question remains
Do you talk the talk but not waddle the walk?
Now, now, children...............
O.K I'll go to my room now and let the thread get back on track.
tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,400
- Reactions
- 6,317
Thats the sort of stupidity that is found on these sites.
Nothing to add just childish rubbish.
Ive posted charts
Ive presented another method of trading TGA
and because it doesnt "fit" with the Fundamental
junkies all they can do is go duck hunting.
Knock yourself out team.
Personaly Tech/a I enjoy your TA point of view, Just don't enjoy the bickering against FA and sometimes the arrogance that you may not think flows through your posts but others do.
Enjoy your TA pov, but not the FA v TA debate
If anything the last week has shown how both have worked together in this case IMO.
Enjoy your TA pov, but not the FA v TA debate
If anything the last week has shown how both have worked together in this case IMO.
- Joined
- 2 June 2011
- Posts
- 5,341
- Reactions
- 242
You can't be serious? The overwhelming majority of people on this thread have stayed quiet while you referred to us as sheep, and pretty much called us all morons because we have a method of investing that doesn't "fit" with your style. Aside from the odd poster (and I can only think of one in this thread), no one has said anything negative about TA.
You have made so many ridiculously inaccuracte (factually) statements on this thread, including the one quoted above, that I get the feeling you don't actually read or comprehend anything that doesn't fit inside your own preconceived ideas. You're a case study in confirmation bias.
I wont admit to having much expertise in charts, but I think you bought in the middle of an old support zone as "weak" as it looked on the way down. If it can break through to 1.57 it will them have a target of 1.62 to 1.64. 1.70 will not be easy, medium term trend is down and market sentiment is still bearish. Target price of your own may be 3R but I dont think if you did this trade 100 times it would have a positive expected value. Hard to comprehend how this is "low risk." But I do not know your system parameters, so hard to comment. Most likely scenario is it will settle in the mid to high 150s after the ex div date. But what would I know? Dyor.
tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,400
- Reactions
- 6,317
What was that about glass houses.
Heavens an in accuracy!
Carry on.
tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,400
- Reactions
- 6,317
You maybe right.
Its a discretionary trade based upon the entry signals shown on the chart.
Its low risk for me as it only have a 4c risk. possible 5R return.
If it fails on with the next.
If it stagnates Ill get out as well..
Just another trade.
- Joined
- 2 June 2011
- Posts
- 5,341
- Reactions
- 242
I like how you attempted to parse my statement but didn't bold the beginning which changes the context of the rest of the sentence. Thank you for making my point so well about an inability to read or comprehend.
Nevertheless, I'll do it for you...
And then again...
And yes, Nutmeg is who came to mind.
McCoy Pauley
Get out of here Budweiser!
- Joined
- 12 November 2009
- Posts
- 616
- Reactions
- 0
Nice to see you carry on that crusade, tech/a.
How about you go about making money the way you choose and let the rest of us get on with making money the way we choose?
tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,400
- Reactions
- 6,317
Nice to see you carry on that crusade, tech/a.
How about you go about making money the way you choose and let the rest of us get on with making money the way we choose?
Thanks for all the support.
Cause your all so nice I'll make a point of hangin around.
Carry on
