Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
I understand what you're saying here JT, but there comes a point where there can be no doubt that an illness is terminal and the person will die, despite every medical intervention and the strong will of the patient.
What advocates of voluntary euthanasia are saying is that at that stage we believe suffering should be minimised by allowing the person an assisted death so that he/she can go at a time of their own choosing and not be forced to endure extreme pain and loss of dignity.
If you have difficulty with this concept, do you think you could try to explain why you would find it more acceptable to allow a dying person extension and prolongation of their misery when they want an end to the pain and a peaceful death?
I'm not asking you this in any antagonistic way, but rather in an attempt to try to understand why people are opposed to voluntary euthanasia and why they feel they should have the right to say when another person should be able to die.
What advocates of voluntary euthanasia are saying is that at that stage we believe suffering should be minimised by allowing the person an assisted death so that he/she can go at a time of their own choosing and not be forced to endure extreme pain and loss of dignity.
If you have difficulty with this concept, do you think you could try to explain why you would find it more acceptable to allow a dying person extension and prolongation of their misery when they want an end to the pain and a peaceful death?
I'm not asking you this in any antagonistic way, but rather in an attempt to try to understand why people are opposed to voluntary euthanasia and why they feel they should have the right to say when another person should be able to die.