- Joined
- 25 September 2007
- Posts
- 1,712
- Reactions
- 13
Stupid thing is that there is absolutely nothing wrong with margin loans as a product. It's the extreme gearing that Storm advised their clients to take which is/was the real issue. Stand in front of an oncoming train and you are going to get totaled. So who is at fault? You for standing in front of the train or the train running merrily along its tracks minding its own business?
I was going to make a submission along those lines to the Parliamentary Committee but came to the conclusion that that is not what they wish to hear. You cannot put brains into a monument aka Committees of Inquiry (dumb buggers cannot even get their definitions correct.).
Good analogy, Judd. I'm getting pretty tired of all the protecting people from themselves stuff.Stupid thing is that there is absolutely nothing wrong with margin loans as a product. It's the extreme gearing that Storm advised their clients to take which is/was the real issue. Stand in front of an oncoming train and you are going to get totaled. So who is at fault? You for standing in front of the train or the train running merrily along its tracks minding its own business?
Quite understand how you feel. Some years ago I was "done" by a crooked solicitor. Lost quite a lot of money.Has there been any indication of what type, or level of settlement CBA are offering?
It would seem to me the most they would do is waive some, or at most all of outstanding home equity loans
I could not forsee that anyone would get back one cent of any lost investment money.
As a shareholder of CBA, I for one would not want them to, unless they were legally obliged, which would suppose extreme negligence or criminal conduct by CBA.
Many Storm investors would have had investments over $500k, and therefore be classified as "sophisticated investors"
In this instance, investors are expected to have reasonable knowledge
It would be really interesting to see who reduced their equity exposure at the right time, or even pulled out entirely, as they should have done, if resistance was encountered
No-one is offering to compensate me for "losing" money on shares I held, including CBA.
I could have sold them at $60, or $50
I dont mean to be heartless, and have a different view about Storm, but they aint around anymore
Good Lord, gg, don't they have one of the most litigious legal firms in the country acting for them? What more do they need????Perhaps a representative from ASF such as Solley should present the opinions of "unsophisticated" investors to the Parliamentarians in their Inquiry into Storm Financial.
gee anastasia your story sounds very familiar-i wonder why! yep it was all about trust-something we are finding a bit hard to do again- how do you know who to trust?? i rememnber those comm bank school banking passbook years ago-those comm bank tin money boxes that you would put your one,two and five cents in and take to the bank and get emptied- gee it seems like they try to get you very very early to trust the banks-that is why i cant beleive what has happened now- you think you are doing the right thing in dealing with big banks and a financial mob that has been around for ages-then look what happens the whole thing turns to crap-i hope that people who read this take a bitof a lesson about the banks-friends and family are not happy with what has happened and beleive me they are now very carefull which banks they will now do business with. maybe we should bring back the community type building societies-what do you think?? and there is still not a peep from mr c- i'd really love to hear from him-i would like to speak to him directly . does anybody know his number or his email ? big max can you help?
Chrisgee. Sorry, can't help with EC's contact details. Contrary to GG and other conspiracy theorists, we at SICAG do not have that particular gentleman on speed dial.
On another matter, I hope I get the hotel room next to GG in 2011 when the Storm bad guys face the bewigged man with the gavel. It will be good to catch up again.
Chrisgee. Sorry, can't help with EC's contact details. Contrary to GG and other conspiracy theorists, we at SICAG do not have that particular gentleman on speed dial.
On another matter, I hope I get the hotel room next to GG in 2011 when the Storm bad guys face the bewigged man with the gavel. It will be good to catch up again.
Just for laughs i am sharing the room on the other side then, and we can car pool, i have free parking at the law courts , should be a hoot. !!!!
gg, I'm looking forward to seeing you and Big Max having a sing-a-long around the Steinbach in The Lennons Bar at 2am after debating the finer points of the evidence presented in the daily proceedings.
I really hope I'll still be in Oz in Oct '11 and not stuck on a DC-8 on heading for Bogotá from Miami
Has there been any indication of what type, or level of settlement CBA are offering?
It would seem to me the most they would do is waive some, or at most all of outstanding home equity loans
I could not forsee that anyone would get back one cent of any lost investment money.
As a shareholder of CBA, I for one would not want them to, unless they were legally obliged, which would suppose extreme negligence or criminal conduct by CBA.
Many Storm investors would have had investments over $500k, and therefore be classified as "sophisticated investors"
In this instance, investors are expected to have reasonable knowledge
It would be really interesting to see who reduced their equity exposure at the right time, or even pulled out entirely, as they should have done, if resistance was encountered
No-one is offering to compensate me for "losing" money on shares I held, including CBA.
I could have sold them at $60, or $50
I dont mean to be heartless, and have a different view about Storm, but they aint around anymore
We never got first home owners grant, baby bonuses and all the other handouts that the y generation and others have..
Yes but you didn't have $25-30k HECS loans, your first house didn't cost 12-15 years of salary to pay off, and all of your health care was practically free. I'm sorry but the Boomers vs Gen X vs Gen Y argument never works for me. Each has had their fair share of pro's and con's. Although I must guiltily admit that I get a perverse feeling of amusement watching a Gen Y at work get their 'comeuppance' at the hands of the Gen X/Boomers....but I digress....
Good to hear that things seem to be working out for you mate, a person close to me just got a settlement from CBA which will mean she will keep her house and will look forward to a great retirement. Not as great as it could have been, but it's a godsend noting what has happened over the past year or so.
hang in there buddy.
We never got first home owners grant, baby bonuses and all the other handouts that the y generation and others have..
looks like there has been some action since ive been away-a few vacancies in the 'which bank' hey-i wonder why? - ok big max i see you you cant help but maybe ill write a letter to mr c or maybe now i cant be bothered it probably would be thrown in the bin any way- mr gg reckomns there will be some action in 2011 that will be interesting to see-ive read a couple of subs to the enquiry they seem to have a familiar ring to them- why was money lent out in the first place? if the banks said no to the loans none of this would have happened- its probably more complex than this ill also let the guys with the wigs and gavels work that out- they are way smatatrer than me- are you guys serious about meeting at lennons ? it might be worth a bus trip down just see the action- i still dont trust the big guys with all of this-at least i've just spent a few days out of town with some real decent folk-and thats always good to be around in times like this--
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?