- Joined
- 22 May 2020
- Posts
- 1,276
- Reactions
- 681
Yep, similar with TGR, usually when you look through them, they report EBIDTA that is multiples of Cash Flow, it just never gets to the bottom line and CapEx is the main reason. Its not a pretty sector for investors!
Anyway, with the share price currently at 5.4c, I will watch with interest as Project Sea Dragon finally starts becoming a reality.
Sea Dragon is a massive project and they needed to find the money somewhere, i have always considered SeafarmsI suspect they needed to offer the placement shares at such a large discount to get the CR fully subscribed.
The $92.5 million will be used to start construction on Project Sea Dragon in the Northern Territory.
Sea Dragon is a massive project and they needed to find the money somewhere, i have always considered Seafarms
to be the equivalent of a prospective miner with a large ore deposit but no money to pay for the mine and infrastructure.
The 92 Million cap raising basically guarantees that they can make a very large start on Sea Dragon, 92 million should see them producing something from the project, pretty low risk entry at this point i would think.There's a little voice in the back of my head telling me that the 5c mark might be a great long term entry point for SFG... if they can pull Project Sea Dragon off.
There's a little voice in the back of my head telling me that the 5c mark might be a great long term entry point for SFG... if they can pull Project Sea Dragon off.
pretty low risk entry at this point i would think.
There's a little voice in the back of my head telling me that the 5c mark might be a great long term entry point for SFG... if they can pull Project Sea Dragon off.
Seafarms Group Limited (ASX: SFG) (Seafarms) announced today that newly appointed Executive Chairman Mick McMahon has initiated a review of Project Sea Dragon (PSD) which is expected to take several months.
As recently announced PSD Construction is underway and arrangements for debt and equity funding for the project were being addressed. It is now not considered feasible to finalise debt and equity funding arrangements before the end of the calendar year and this delay in funding arrangements will consequently lead to delays in the project schedule, while noting that planned wet season construction activity was limited in any event.
Mr McMahon said “Given these circumstances we will undertake a Project Review to consider impacts on the project schedule and overall economics, in order to be best placed to complete funding requirements in the new year.”
Thats how it looks to me, the NT project is a massive capital intensive investment and its not a clear path to profit by any means.
.....
I think there is much better places to invest capital.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?