- Joined
- 19 May 2010
- Posts
- 293
- Reactions
- 1
UBIQ, while i like SSN, this thing is that far ahead of it in terms of dev and derisking its not funny. Bout time you saw the lights.
Yep, at risk of turning this thread into the American O&G speccie conference, condog has a fair point in that SEA is more advanced than SSN in terms of proving up the acreage. On the other hand, I do like SSN's cash position. Nevertheless from what I gather, both have high class, level headed directors that are pulling all the right strings at the moment. Both companies are going to be big in 2011, and thus, it makes sense to have a stake in both. We will see the rise and rise of SEA, and the establishment of another O&G play in SSN.
I do have a question with regards to SEA. I know earlier in the year they had a SPP to raise capital when the share price was a third of what it is now. Does anyone see the need for short term capital given that the company is going to try and ramp up proceedings in the next 6 months?
Cheers.
Onshore oil is HOT in the US. BP has helped matters!
I do like both SSN and SEA for different reasons but as you've alluded to guys, were really splitting hairs here. You last question is why I hold SSN as well as SEA. I think SEA will be farming out to raise cash as needed but once they get ahead on the cashflow next year, they'll be self funding.
...they turn that capital requirement into multiples and accellerate growth, like AUT did, like SEA so far are doing. If so, imo dont worry about it.
Funny you should say that. I've learnt from my encounter with AUT's SPP that one shouldn't turn a blind eye to these opportunities for cheap shares if the company is going places. I think all too often we as investors look at cap raisings in a negative manner because it brings on dilution. Sure, if your company is an absolute dog you could be excused for not taking a part in a SPP, but for these up and comeing O&G plays, a SPP can be fantastic for shareholders to top up on their holding.
Not according to my last calculations - the cap raising detailed the spend of all capital raised and it basically covered exploration and the SEA contribution to development costs in all of their existing plays. My entry to SEA was a small purchase to gain access to the cap raising so that would date the calculations to then (at work so don't have the figures handy).I do have a question with regards to SEA. I know earlier in the year they had a SPP to raise capital when the share price was a third of what it is now. Does anyone see the need for short term capital given that the company is going to try and ramp up proceedings in the next 6 months?
It might not be clear to the naked eye, but SEA is holding up very well. You will notice a swelling of buyers around 35cents. This coinciding with a bounce off 35.5cents indicates to me that we have a new key support level at 35. Good!!
I think in the comeing months the market will really open their eyes up to these shale oil companies in America. Take for example the rerating with AUT at the moment. SSN has the same common denominator when it comes to the company's bottom line. Promising acreages, solid management, generous financial positioning. Seems like a bit of a no brainer to me.
DOWJones Average was up over the weekend and a nice pre-open depth for the holders...
Very promising start to Friday.....
34 buyers for 1,917,779 units 28 sellers for 729,896 units
x2.5 times the sellers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?