This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Same sex marriage - Yes or No?

Same sex marriage - Yes or No?

  • Yes

    Votes: 77 55.8%
  • No

    Votes: 61 44.2%

  • Total voters
    138
Care to elaborate what these particular groups are? Can't be Muslims because homosexuality is a cardinal sin..
pz99, you really need to wake up to the practises in Afghanistan or Pakistan where female being evil, young boys are dressed up, added lipstick and f*cked to oblivion by the very same pure islam followers talibans(and this has been going on for hundred of years, this is the fate of orphans there.Even liberal media used to report it.just google it
Or could it be donkey? the latest in Morroco:

http://nypost.com/2017/08/16/teens-treated-for-rabies-after-alleged-sexual-contact-with-donkey/
(I purposely did use the nypost so I can not be accused of conspiracy right wing nuts, you can find the same info in Morrocan news, with a bit of explanations as to why it is common practise
So next survey: can I marry my donkey?or dog
Anyway, I do not believe the SSM debate was brought in by the Muslim community, just another way to distract attention potentially away from that same community, while the whole population get screwed by our elites, and I do not believe we have been asked to sign a conscent(sp?) form before.
But the usual left/right makes sure we bend down, and people are surprised by Trump and Clinton a year on can still not believe she lost.How dare people do that!!Just another conspiracy obviously, all is good in the west front
 
just replace yes by no and you got my position; I am yet to find a single media scare campaign favoring the NO?ABC, SBS, News ltd, Murdoch? Even Quantas and the life savers club want me to vote yes
 
Your erroneous assumption that a religion is redefined by violators is akin to saying Christianity supports pedophilia because of a handful of Catho kiddie fiddlers. That's illogical.

Thanks for using Trump and Clinton to intensify your argument... I didn't vote for either.

No, you can't marry your donkey
 
just replace yes by no and you got my position; I am yet to find a single media scare campaign favoring the NO?ABC, SBS, News ltd, Murdoch? Even Quantas and the life savers club want me to vote yes
So you didn't watch the NO ads that everyone's been talking about for weeks?

Clearly their campaign strategy isn't working then - hence the result. I stopped listening to them when they started pushing around their stoopid anti lefty wheel barrow which has nothing to do with SSM.
 
So you didn't watch the NO ads that everyone's been talking about for weeks?
Actually no, I do not watch much TV and no, I have not even seen a single one that I can remember; I was away O/S during some of that time, but apart for the neverending propaganda on ABC, SBS and Brisbane Times, not much of a NO presence.
But all Australia's problems will be solved once the law is voted, what will be the next campaign? I am really worried for the mental state of that donkey discussed above.Should talk to the Green
 
actually sadly they shot the donkey if I remember well... but this is definitively off topic
 
Well... hopefully the next campaign will be the next federal election that doesn't focus on SSM... which is what will happen if a NO vote wins. There are far more important issues.

Could you imagine the uproar if Bill Shorten won an election simply because Labor supports SSM ?
 
We will see, and I reserve the right to say "told ya so"
 


No they just don't care about our nation building culture of the past, they are more interested in getting on bandwagons that satiate grief stricken outcast friends rather than moving outside their comfort zone and focusing on cohesive community rather than a fragmented one that will eventually result in a mini USA of disaffected and disenfranchised haters of the parasites and elite.

Insofar as what particular groups: have a look at the various ABC pics and you will readily see which ones they are, especially the little one of the pair who invariably hangs off a daddy sized human.
 
I don't watch the ABC or much TV at all - probably Bathurst was my last viewing.

I can do without the attempts by the media to spoonfeed me with sensationalist BS.

However I'm curious about these people who migrated here with the power to devalue our outlook on decent society. That's a new one for me.
 
Dictionaries have, for many years, defined marriage as the formalisation of a relationship between a man and a woman. This is how most religious people in the world would like it to remain, and I feel that their views should be respected. Gay people should create their own description of a union between people of the same sex. I do understand their desire to be seen in the same light as every one else, but their unions are inherently different.
 


Sounds like you are ill informed to judge the ABC and absence of the NO vote propaganda on the the visual media.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...