This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Same sex marriage - Yes or No?

Same sex marriage - Yes or No?

  • Yes

    Votes: 77 55.8%
  • No

    Votes: 61 44.2%

  • Total voters
    138

Agreed and I also hope that if the yes vote wins that Abbott and the like have no input into the legislation. They had the opportunity to negotiate a bill to put towards parliament but they kicked and screamed demanding a public vote, they don't get to hedge their bets both ways.
 
What seems absolutely nuts to me is the number of people who say they are voting No for reasons that have nothing to do with the actual question, eg voting No because they think Australia is to pc, that's the dumbest thing I have ever heard.
 
Can you imagine what it will be like if "yes" doesn't win?

The vote isn't a remedy! It's just another symptom of the same disease which brought us that "let's all brainwash our preadolescent children", "educational" programme.

Either way, it looks like I may need to furnish a closet to "hide out" in, lest I be gang bashed by one of the many rampant homophilic lynch mobs, brought to us courtesy of incitement by the academic elite, all of whom, ardently attest, to the sweetness of the aroma surrounding their personal flatulence.

No matter which way this vote goes, I fail to see any possibility of a win for our society.

Until the underlying problem is truly recognised and understood, efforts to devise, and/or implement, solutions, are nothing more than an exercise in folly, for which our society will very likely end up paying a heavy price.
 
Last edited:
Okay I have a question. Much has been made of Howard changing the marriage act in 2004 to make it man and woman.

Why then was there no ssm previous to that?


Homosexuality was illegal upto around 1985 so to campaigning for gay marriage would be a VC style non sequitur.

In 1985 Mr " Do you know why I have credibility? Because I don't exude morality" Hawke made sure his mate Neal Blewett wouldn't be outed and charged.

In between 1985 and 2004 people had some residual common sense, even in the face of the tidal wave of political correctness that flooded onto our shores thanks to the Republicans in the USA using PC as a weapon to bludgeon their Democrat rivals ... that worked well, so well the new left took it and repurposed it.

From the 90's on, parliament has played host to Bob Brown, Penny Wong, Louise Pratt, Janet Rice, Robert Simms, Dean Smith, etc

In 2004 GW Bush moved to outlaw gay marriage because he didn't want his lesbian daughter closing the door on the possibility of waking up to herself and finding a man to marry. Being the deputy sherriff of the USA, John got on the case also.
 
What seems absolutely nuts to me is the number of people who say they are voting No for reasons that have nothing to do with the actual question, eg voting No because they think Australia is to pc, that's the dumbest thing I have ever heard.


What's dumb about it? I'm guessing you are too young to remember the days before PC and various freedoms lost since then.

Thin end of the wedge my son, thin end of the wedge
 
What's dumb about it? I'm guessing you are too young to remember the days before PC and various freedoms lost since then.

Thin end of the wedge my son, thin end of the wedge

Because the question is about gay marriage, not whether you want more pc or not.

It's dumb because if you are asked a genuine question, you should answer the question, not some other question you made up in your head.

They want your opinion on ssm, not your opinion on pc, they will have no idea about the question in your head you made up.
 

This stirs you up VC.

Most of us realize its not that simple.
Dumbing it down with words on a PC
doesn't turn us blind.

And if your Incinerating that I'm Dumb Ill Sue your Arse off.
 
This stirs you up VC.

Most of us realize its not that simple.
Dumbing it down with words on a PC
doesn't turn us blind.

And if your Incinerating that I'm Dumb Ill Sue your Arse off.
I would never incinerate that! I wouldn't even dare to insinuate it either!
 
Think its a HOT topic!

I'm a member of the ADN
National Dyslexics Association.
 
No matter which way this vote goes, I fail to see any possibility of a win for our society.
There will be trouble further down the road no matter who wins.
If NO gets up there will be protest after protest.
If YES gets up there will be protest over the legislation (which should have been decided before the vote).
 
I have received my postal vote form, ticked a box and returned it in the reply paid envelope supplied.

Whilst I'm of the view that two consenting adults can do as they please, marriage is between a man and a woman.

I have also now cast my vote in this thread reflecting the above.
 
Hey! I just noticed that the "yes" vote in the poll on this thread has dipped below 60%.

Have we had a lot of latecomers to the "no" party, or are members reversing their "yes" votes?
 
And if your Incinerating that I'm Dumb Ill Sue your Arse off.

I said "it's Dumb", e.g. in my opinion the action is a dumb.

I didn't say "You are Dumb", but if you can't see the difference perhaps I need to reconsider.
 
Have we had a lot of latecomers to the "no" party,

Yes, such as watchdog, who only joined yesterday and who's only 12 posts all appear to be a the gay marriage thing.

and I suspect this forum probably isn't the only one he joined recently to spread his opinion, and after this vote, will probably won't hear from him again.
 
Hey! I just noticed that the "yes" vote in the poll on this thread has dipped below 60%.

Have we had a lot of latecomers to the "no" party, or are members reversing their "yes" votes?
I did notice after voting that there is an option to change vote.

I may have been the one that tipped "no" over 40%.
 
During the past 24 hours, I have read a number of posts by watchdog11 in other threads within this forum , so please, let's not allow our personal prejudices to obscure our view of actual facts!
 
Whichever way you look at it, 99 votes is a pretty good turnout for a forum.

@Joe Blow have you voted yet ? LOL
 
What seems absolutely nuts to me is the number of people who say they are voting No for reasons that have nothing to do with the actual question, eg voting No because they think Australia is to pc, that's the dumbest thing I have ever heard.

Actually I don't think it is dumb, even if Tony Abbott agrees with it.

There are some times when you have to draw a line and show some people that the majority have had enough of a small but loud minority who want to shut US up and shape majority society to their world view. eg designing whole anti bullying school courses around one particular issue important to them and ignoring a multitude of other factors that impacts on children and their welfare. That is a pernicious bias that shouldn't be allowed to continue.

As I said before, I think a better solution is not to change the Marriage Act, but to have separate legislation for LGBxyz unions, which will recognise the rights of consenting adults to marry but to also send a message that the majority want to keep their own traditions intact and will not be infiltrated by a noisy few.
 
Well there goes the first $60million


http://www.news.com.au/national/bre...e/news-story/59ed123e2e6d1c6a0da516f673e507d1
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...