- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,357
- Reactions
- 7,232
I think people are not aware of the wide range of sexual behaviours in the clergy. Obviously the focus on the Royal Commission has been child sexual abuse. But in the broader picture Bishops and fellow priests would recognise the following behaviours amongst their flock
1) Gay relationships sometimes between clergy sometimes with outsiders
2) Heterosexual Relationships between priests and many different women. They could be completely outside the church, housekeepers, casual relationships, sometimes prostitutes. This became even stickier if the other party was a parishioner. It became particularly dangerous when priests comforted recently deceased widows...
What was the church supposed to do with these situations ? Should they be expelled ? Sanctioned ? When ? Who by ? What would the effect be on the community if they heard about such behaviours ?
And finally How many religious people would be left if such sanctions were enforced ?
I raise this point because it does affect how the Church generally glossed over or ignored almost anything it could in this arena.
1) Gay relationships sometimes between clergy sometimes with outsiders
2) Heterosexual Relationships between priests and many different women. They could be completely outside the church, housekeepers, casual relationships, sometimes prostitutes. This became even stickier if the other party was a parishioner. It became particularly dangerous when priests comforted recently deceased widows...
What was the church supposed to do with these situations ? Should they be expelled ? Sanctioned ? When ? Who by ? What would the effect be on the community if they heard about such behaviours ?
And finally How many religious people would be left if such sanctions were enforced ?
I raise this point because it does affect how the Church generally glossed over or ignored almost anything it could in this arena.