In general i dont like ETF's much however i was thinking the other day that a big diversified portfolio made up of just ETF,s would have a few advantages.
Firstly set and forget, you just wouldn't have to worry about anything investment related, Secondly unlike individual stocks they cannot fail, so no 100% losers, thirdly a
big portfolio of 20 diverse ETF's would capture almost very outlier event, i mean like the best performing ETF last year was the Palladium (metal) ETF, went up like 80%
or so and has already gone up another 80% this year...who the hell is deliberately going to buy that?
With say 20 deliberately very diverse ETF,s you could have the world covered, all the commodities and currencies and indexes, equal weight, and a div yield of maybe 3%
That is my goal eventually, I have enough outside super in shares in my wife's name, for her to keep under the tax free threshold. The investments in super are split between my wife and myself approx 30%/60%, hers in accumulation mine in pension, with 4% drawdown.And completely off tangent but what the heck. My late wife and I considered it better to hold shares separately. Made estate planning better from a tax viewpoint for beneficiaries. Some may also wish to consider separate holdings. Imagine all the mess you may have to go through to get joint holdings of shares into one name.
And an oddity of tax. A household with a single income is financially worse of than a household of two separate incomes totaling that of the single income household. Application of two tax-free thresholds as opposed to one. Go figure.
The problem with super is the rules can and do change and usually you don't have any say in it.
I'm assuming it must be due to the ETF nature of the instrument as I also have two orders sitting under the present price for a couple of ETFs and they don't show in the depth of orders either. I'd guess that the manager (Vanguard, iShares etc) place bulk orders instead or something along those lines??I ended up phoning CommSec who are looking into my query. I cancelled the order and the opened another, which still does not show. My account is up to date and I haven’t experienced this before.
CommSec said they’d phone me back once it’s resolved.
No big deal, just unusual.
Or is comsec bypassing the market thru its own pool of orders,possibly hitting you on the way
I found in the past that my sells on comsec at a minimum price get executed strangely at that price whereas on bell direct, they get executed as expected
Thanks Belli.
Tough times aren't they? I decided we had too much in the market and too little in cash - So reduced my positions in a number of stocks early last week and the week before. Including ARG
Didn't have many VGS and VAS and only acquired them last year - and have held them, albeit at a loss for now.
FMG, SYD are two that I like .
Oh yeah, add Apa to my list too, I have owned them since 2001, and enlarged the position in 2008 when they were selling at a 10% dividend yield (madness).
They are a great little gem in my portfolio.
Have you used this time to buy more SYD?
Thanks for re activating the thread Belli, funny how things change in a short period of time.The problem ...........… is the rules can and do change and usually you don't have any say in it.
CGT, GST, variation to thresholds, corporate tax rates, elimination of deductions for travel and so on. Just as many, or possibly more, variations outside of super. While the changes are, er, annoying, I'm not fussed about them really as it's part of the investing landscape and we simply have to deal with what comes. Wouldn't deter me from contributing to super if the legislation permitted but it don't. Nor would it surprise me in the least if a future Government decided anyone over 65 yo, or pick some age, and not working should be allowed to have super funds in accumulation phase.
We are of a same mind, I haven't sold anything and am buying more, are you still sticking to the LIC's and ETF'sMaybe. I haven't sold anything and keep fully invested apart from having sufficient funds to cover my needs and wants for 12 months. I am simply buying more at a lesser price than they were previously. Could certainly go down further but I've no idea when the bottom will be reached. It's all a guess.
Don't follow the prices of my holdings very much. Usually see when I go to purchase more so I'm not aware of the day-to-day or month-to-month fluctuations. Got better things to do.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?