- Joined
- 14 December 2010
- Posts
- 3,472
- Reactions
- 248
Illogical theory. It is not necessary to have any belief or interest in any sort of god to possess a sound moral philosophy. The self-righteous tone does become irritating, pavilion.
You have missed the point.
"Sound moral philosophy" - who defines this morality? Society? The individual?
If so then which society or individual defines it?
Hitler? Mother Teresa?
Without a God (a moral law giver) it is by definition subjective. This is not an opinion. Look at the works of atheist philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.
Self-righteous? In no way am I being self-righteous in stating that without a God there are no moral absolutes. Even Nietzsche, an atheist realized this. If anything I am being the opposite of self-righteous by admitting that my definition of morality cannot be trusted, and thus I put my trust in the objective morality of God.
Now don't get this mistaken for me saying that I don't think an atheist can be a good person morally. Of course they can, many are. I'm just saying that without a moral law giver morality is subjective. This is a fairly obvious statement I would have thought, one accepted by 90% of the atheists that I know!!!