This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Religion IS crazy!

Jump to new

Some of the food may also be contaminated, or have way too much industrial engineering, and delivered to my door with the best of intentions too

Does bootleg Disney movies count? Not that I would ever thought of it of course.

But yes, the foundation is strong. Just like anything it need an alert public. Else, as they say, the tree of liberty may from time to time be nourish with the blood of tyrants, capitalists and patriots

Let's be alert shall we.
 
Value Collector said:
I think if you took all the parts of the system away that are either owned, constructed, supplied by or maintained by private companies or contractors you wouldn't have a system.
Click to expand...

I'm talking about ownership of assets.

Sure, sub contract out to private enterprise the operational bits, but selling (or the stupid 99 year lease) is relinquishing control of public essential service assets to private interests, thereby taking them out of the control of elected representatives who represent us, not a small body of shareholders.
 

Gov't funded all of the infrastructures. Even those that were build and constructed by private enterprise - it got built, often at extremely high risk and cost over-run, because the gov't foot the bill.

Take the roads... proper roads and bridges were never funded by private capitalists. The Fords and GMs of the world merely built the car, and they would not be taken up in any hurry if the gov't did not then fund roads and bridges. And they definitely would not be running if the gov't does not send armies and embassadors to certain places to secure certain fields and trade routes.

Take, for example, Boeing and their jets. Heard that the US gov't "sold" all the land for Boeing's plant in Washington for $1. The gov't then funded all its R&D, funded all the subcontractors building those navigation etc. systems... Sure it was done so Hitler won't be coming over but once done Boeing then own the rights and have the know-how to then monopolise the entire market for a long while.

There are not that many entreprenuerial geniuses who create entire markets themselves. Those few that may have are arguably not capitalists at all - but are entreprenuers - the dreamers. Even Elon Musk and his space company, as well as Tesla, are largely funded right now through gov't subsidies.

But if we just read the headlines it appear like the guy take his own cash from PayPal and fund the entire venture. I mean he's smart and innovative and all that of course... just he's not this lone genius who want to change the world while the gov't can't do anything but close down NASA's space shuttles.
 
Good.

The Netherlands has recognised the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster as a religion​


 

My original statement was stating that without capitalists input, the lights wouldn't be on now.
 

I never said the governments didn't do anything, I am not one of those anti government folks.

I am just say I am just saying the backbone of the world is free enterprise, we thrive because everyday people wake up and go an try and make a buck, it works, I don't have to be a hunter gather because other people are experts in their fields, doing their best to feed, clothe and house me at competitive prices and I am trying to serve them in my fields as best I can.

---------

Look at that MRM you brought to my attention, every day it's out their competing trying to serve its customers supplying essential services to the rigs.

Thanks for bringing it to my attention by the way, up over 30% so far , I might owe you a carton of beer soon.
 

Yea? And what field is that? Ya lazy capitalist pig. haha...

I was discussing, well kinda me talking while my wife try not to sleep... about Dick Smith and Anchorage. I kinda did not blame Anchorage too much and understand where they're coming from and how people ought to read what they say... that kinda woke her up a bit. Moral decay or capitalism talking?
 
luutzu said:
Yea? And what field is that? Ya lazy capitalist pig. haha...

?
Click to expand...

Hey, I have skills man, hahahaha, I'm not lazy, it just doesn't take me long to earn my daily bread, lol

Also being there to buy people's shares in great little companies when they are panic selling is providing a service, isn't it? Lol, some has to have be patient capital to balance out the market.
 

Some may call that taking advantage of people. But since I try to do that too, we're all good

But yes, value investors are there to keep the market efficient.
 
luutzu said:
Some may call that taking advantage of people. But since I try to do that too, we're all good

But yes, value investors are there to keep the market efficient.
Click to expand...

They click the sell button, not me, me being in the market actually helps them get a better price than they would other wise, so I am not taking advantage of them.
 
Value Collector said:
I didn't dispure that.

My point is that we all have a better standard of living because "greedy capitalist" are fighting to serve us everyday.
Click to expand...

I don't dispute that either, I'm just saying that we would all be better off if there was more ethical capitalism and less greedy capitalism.
 
SirRumpole said:
I don't dispute that either, I'm just saying that we would all be better off if there was more ethical capitalism and less greedy capitalism.
Click to expand...

More ethical everything would make th world better.

But, even ethical capitalism needs the greedy bit, I what's the point of the ethical energy generation company building one wind farm and then saying, no that's all we need, my share holders aren't greedy, we want them to want more dividends, so they reinvest back into more wind farms etc.

Waning more, leads to producing more, offcourse I am not a fan of gluttony and waste, but that different to capitistic greed as I think of it. With out that type of greed the huge capital accumulation that has allowed gates, Buffett and countless other to do world changing charity wouldn't be possible.
 

In an ethical society, shareholders are only one part of the whole equation and the needs of everyone (including the national and global interests) needs to be weighed up.

So either 1. the corporations can do this themselves or 2. we have laws that protect the consumer, environment, society, government revenue etc.

So far, only number 2. seems to have much effect.
 

Yeah, shareholders are only one part, but it's their money that must be invested to grow companies and provide services into the economy that we need, in any given project, they are the first to have to lay out money and the last to get paid, and they bear the brunt of project and investment risk.

without shareholders willing to continually reinvest their earnings to grow companies, conduct research, explore for resources, and start risky new ventures, we wouldn't have the standard of living we have, the fact that it is probably greed that leads people to do these things is fine, as I said gluttony is the "sin" not greed.
 

So you don't think people would want to invest in ethical companies ?
 
Value Collector said:
They click the sell button, not me, me being in the market actually helps them get a better price than they would other wise, so I am not taking advantage of them.
Click to expand...

yup. We're the one being taken advantage of - buying things for cheap just to watch it go cheaper. Selling thing at fair price just to watch it go higher. I'm going to stop playing fair man.

But seriously, I agree with you. Intelligent capital allocation is what builds the world
 

They're also working on removing number two too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...