- Joined
- 24 May 2009
- Posts
- 3,252
- Reactions
- 255
As has been said many times in this forum,
Science was never made to disprove God.
Science was never made to disprove God.
It's no good coming at me with the religious stuff, I've said I don't believe it.
If you want to know what I think read my previous posts, I've had enough of going around in circles with VC.
I didn't say you believe in a Creator.
Was trying to project what it'd mean if such a creator were to exist.
As has been said many times in this forum,
Science was never made to disprove God.
I do believe in a creator, just not the kind depicted in the Bible.
Good questions Grasshopper, IF one's view of the creator is the biblical paradigm. But who says the creator is a being, or even conscious in the human understanding of such?How big would that Creator be?
If the Creator did create the entire universe, with everthing in it - all the suns, the galaxies, the elements. That all the known universe since the Big Bang is His creation, he'd be one big massive being. I mean, some galaxy would take millions of light years for us to reach - So a spaceship that could travel at the speed of light will take millions of years to reach... that's a very very very long way away.
Then if it is possible that there is this Creator who create all these stuff. Why are we the chosen species in this vast universe He created? I mean, our Earth is a little dot next to some known star out there. We human are a little atom relative to the sun alone. Why would the Creator really take notice and take us as His favourite creation, sending down his only son and all that?
Say I build a house... what are the chances of me sending my son to a little ant's nest to save it?
There are things we don't know, may never know, could never prove... but the idea that need refuting is so rediculous in its scale it just doesn't need much evidence to disprove it.
Again... the Creator create this big massive universe all these billions of years... and it's only the last maybe 5,000 years that our specie kind of started writing - on clay; only last couple hundred years that some really advanced technologies came to do some work for humans; only some 60 years ago that one country could send a few guys to the Moon. and we're somehow the most intelligent, the most beloved of this Creator's creation?
I do believe in a creator, just not the kind depicted in the Bible.
Good questions Grasshopper, IF one's view of the creator is the biblical paradigm. But who says the creator is a being, or even conscious in the human understanding of such?
Far from humans being created in God's image, the biblical God is created by man in his own image.
God (for want of a better word) may be something else completely.
Just food for thought. Now go do 1000 push ups on your knuckles.
Just wondering why or how that human beings are the only organism to develop intelligence. Trial and error evolution like nothing else.
As has been said many times in this forum,
Science was never made to disprove God.
there mite be species out there that see us as nothing but an amusement, like we look at chimps.
They might be able to spell might too, mightn't they?
Lol, I am bad at that, it's a combination of me either missing or pressing the wrong letters on my iPhone key pad, and then auto correct trying to guess what I was trying to say.
Just wondering why or how that human beings are the only organism to develop intelligence. Trial and error evolution like nothing else.
It depends om your definition of intelligence. The human race is adept at adapting to our environment, we can cure a lot of diseases that would otherwise kill us, but we spend a lot of resources developing new weapons to kill each other and some that potentially could wipe out most life on earth.
Intelligence ? Yes and no.
it's not a judgement on whether your actions are moral or wise.
You can have your definition which is true but limited imo.
Putting humanity on the brink of extinction by stockpiling nuclear, chemical and biological weapons is not evidence of a clever society imo.
Nor is destroying the environment to increase our levels of affluence,
You can have your definition which is true but limited imo.
Putting humanity on the brink of extinction by stockpiling nuclear, chemical and biological weapons is not evidence of a clever society imo.
Nor is destroying the environment to increase our levels of affluence, nor is accelerating our use of non renewable resources to create more consumers so a few people can make a lot of money.
I agree, doing those things is very "Unwise" (unless it brings about peace through assured mutual destruction, and world wars are ended, we haven't had a world war since the nuke), but it certainly takes intelligence to build a nuclear weapon, in the scientific usage of the word.
We have been doing that since we first cut the first tree down to build a house, when it becomes unsustainable is where it becomes unwise, other wise I am all for raising the standard of human lives around the world.
We in the first world can certainly do things better to reduce waste and lower our impact though.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.