- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
Such rationale will not phase a religious fundamentalist who will simply reject the basic premise that their God, its design, its will or its word is flawed in any way by definition (the gender specific pronoun he can't really apply to a monotheistic God concept) - doubt is for fallen unbelievers under Satan's influence. For the fundamentalist, God has spoken (past tense) in the form of creation, revealed truth in scripture, and its prophets. No further revelation is required.If god wants us to know, we'll know. He's all powerful. He could just flip the switch marked "know of My Terrible Existence". If we don't know, it's because he doesn't want us to know. And there's nothing any of us could do to outwit god. If we could prove the existence of god despite his opposition, we would have outsmarted him. So anyone who says something proves the existence of god is blaspheming. They are calling god an idiot.
In my culture, we're told that we descended from the Mountain Phoenix and the Dragon lord of the East Sea. That the two one day meet, laid 100 eggs - 50 males, 50 females -
The myth of eternal life in a heavenly paradise is just to intoxicating for many to let go of with the first casualty being any true desire to question why one should believe fantastic claims in magic books for essentially bad reasons.
hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious or racial group. The term anti-Semitism was coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm Marr to designate the anti-Jewish campaigns under way in central Europe at that time. Although the term now has wide currency, it is a misnomer, since it implies a discrimination against all Semites. Arabs and other peoples are also Semites, and yet they are not the targets of anti-Semitism as it is usually understood. The term is especially inappropriate as a label for the anti-Jewish prejudices, statements, or actions of Arabs or other Semites.
Bunyip posted -
It’s the old story....tell people what they want to hear and thousands will flock to listen and believe you without question no matter how outrageous your claims.
A few days later Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski, a three-star general in the SS who had fought in the invasion of the Soviet Union, disagreed. He stated: "If for years, for decades, a doctrine is preached to the effect that the Slav race is an inferior race, that the Jews are not even human beings, then an explosion of this sort is inevitable."
Phht that's nothing when it comes to the origins of man, the aborigine's Wandjina didn't wait for the place to be habitable they just moulded everything from a plastic lump of stardust.... no fuss no muss.
When it comes to the Bible, Adam was jilted by his blasphemous first lover (Lilith) who took off back to heaven where there was plumbing and electricity, so Eve was sent bush as his new squeeze. First case of divorce....
It's safer and less confronting not to question or doubt and construct or embrace sham arguments in defense of the faith. The myth of eternal life in a heavenly paradise is just to intoxicating for many to let go of with the first casualty being any true desire to question why one should believe fantastic claims in magic books for essentially bad reasons.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-11-...fication-due-to-social-media-pressure/5877584
No doubt there will be different opinions on this - mine is that any customer who insists on halal certification for foods they buy from Aussie companies should be told in no uncertain terms to take their business elsewhere.
Theological determinism -- coming to a store near you.No doubt there will be different opinions on this - mine is that any customer who insists on halal certification for foods they buy from Aussie companies should be told in no uncertain terms to take their business elsewhere.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/rel...et-formal-training-in-Islamic-Sharia-law.htmlSharia law is Islam’s legal system. It derives from the Koran and the Hadiths, the sayings and customs attributed to the Prophet Mohammed, as well as fatwas - the rulings of Islamic scholars.
Currently, Sharia principles are not formally addressed by or included in Britain’s laws. However, a network of Sharia courts has grown up in Islamic communities to deal with disputes between Muslim families.
There are reported to be around 85 such courts in the UK – however campaigners say there could be far more.
The Sharia Law event at the Law Society’s headquarters on Chancery Lane, central London on June 24 has already sold out.
It offers training in Sharia law covering wills and inheritance, family and children and corporate and commercial law.
The course is billed as “a forerunner to a planned future seminar series on Islamic law”, the Law Society said.
The bible has been used many times to justify slavery, too.
.
Would you say the same for kosher?
How about vegan?
How about gluten free?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/rel...et-formal-training-in-Islamic-Sharia-law.html
This may have been raised earlier but I haven't been involved with this thread very much. Is it realistic to think what you see above will be attempted in Australia? Religious laws as interpreted from a religious book. It raises the question of how much we value our democracy and the "civilised" laws that apply to all Australian. The creation of a separate, possibly integrated, set of rules and regulations that directly opposes this nation's egalitarian ideology.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?