skc
Goldmember
- Joined
- 12 August 2008
- Posts
- 8,277
- Reactions
- 329
Just a couple of statements to clear my head as I am still in the decision process about CFD's.
1.
As a starter if I had $10,000 to begin with and was to buy standard shares with the thought of trading in the medium term >1 week <6 months and I chose to buy 5 lots of $2000 (not including brokerage for this example) I could get my $10,000 worth.
If I had $10,000 in a CFD account with leverage to $50,000 but only chose to work with the $10,000 as maximum exposure and end up with the same 5 x $2000 packages would that keep things a bit safer.
The exposure is entirely the same, you will never be margin called either way, the maximum to lose is $10K, so neither is safer than the other.
The reason I ask is that I am not very often home in the mother country and do not want to have to deal with excessive amounts of mail as per standard stock purchases that send out share certificates, board meeting announcements etc.
You can choose electronic stock communications for most companies if this is your concern.
2.
Currently the online broker I use charges around $38 for an equity trade but only $11 or 11% depending on the size of the trade plus interest so that could be one reason for going with the CFD trades i.e. reduced brokerage?
Any words of wisdom would be appreciated
Danno
Brokerage cost is a saving, but needs to balance with interest cost like you pointed out. Interest cost can be significant with CFDs as they are charged on your full position size. One way to look at it is to consider your intended average holding time. Say for a $2K position, you can save brokerage of $54 per trade ($38x2 - $11x2). This saving will cover interest costs for ~120-150 days, depending on interest rate and share price.