IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,675
- Reactions
- 4,771
I don't think it matters who you voted for yesterday; the result was awful. A government that has vast dominance in numbers ensures there will be no effective opposition. I don't see how this can be good in the long-term.
Government of the people by business for business eh Calliope ?
Fact is its not. Labor were always going to get a shellacking but to this extent is doing Queensland no favors.
Queensland will effectively have no opposition not that any here will mind if its Labor but power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
WE ARE SICK OF INCREASED TAXES, AND CONTINUAL INCREASED PRICES IN THE COST OF LIVING.
SO: Can the Queenslanders amongst us please say why they voted for their chosen party yesterday? Was their decision based on State or Federal issues?
Fair enough.Eager, how else can voters Australia wide get the message to Gillard? She thumbs her nose at professional polls that have a good track record of showing majority voter sentiment. She seems to refuse to listen to the people who pay her wages. Now it seems the people have stopped listening to her.
Bligh and Gillard have both deceived their electorates with pre-election promises which they clearly did not intend to keep and, in hindsight, looks awfully like it was purely to get votes.
They usually say when a party gets wiped out that only the "rump" of the party is left.
In this case the best word would be "topside" as it is so small and of dubious quality.
http://www.list.co.uk/article/17268-cuts-of-meat-where-your-beef-comes-from/
Also, that guy who Rudd hired and ran this election campaign should never be used by anyone in Labor again.
She was just terrific at that time. And it did seem completely genuine worry and concern that motivated her. The polls quite rightly shot up after that but quickly returned to their lows.I know very little about Qld politics but have learnt a little more from these pages over the past day or so. The only thing I previously knew about Bligh is that she constantly had her head in front of the camera during the floods and Yasi (not opportunistically either) and she seemed to be popular during these crisis, showing good leadership.
I think you're ignoring the different type of population base in the two States.Going back to what I wrote on page 1 about the by-election in Vic that resulted in a 4% swing to Labor: Why was the electorate in that seat not concerned about Federal issues? Was it because they weren't whipped into a frenzy about them? I am assuming that in Qld, the LNP's campaign contained a fair dose of negativity about Federal matters?
Labor heavyweights shun by-election lifeline
Updated March 26, 2012 13:41:29
Story: Newman promises to rule Queensland with dignityRelated Story: Chisholm defends Labor's attacks on NewmanMap: QLD
Deposed Labor minister Cameron Dick has ruled himself out of the running for the South Brisbane by-election sparked by the resignation of former premier Anna Bligh.
Both Mr Dick and former treasurer Andrew Fraser had been touted as possible future leaders of Queensland Labor as it tries to rebuild in the wake of Saturday's massive state election defeat.
Today Mr Dick, the former education and industrial relations minister, said he had been overwhelmed by supporters urging him to run in South Brisbane after losing his seat of Greenslopes to the LNP on Saturday.
"Important that I spend time with T and the kids now, so I won't be running," he tweeted./
She was just terrific at that time. And it did seem completely genuine worry and concern that motivated her. The polls quite rightly shot up after that but quickly returned to their lows.
Fair enough.
I know very little about Qld politics but have learnt a little more from these pages over the past day or so. The only thing I previously knew about Bligh is that she constantly had her head in front of the camera during the floods and Yasi (not opportunistically either) and she seemed to be popular during these crisis, showing good leadership.
Going back to what I wrote on page 1 about the by-election in Vic that resulted in a 4% swing to Labor: Why was the electorate in that seat not concerned about Federal issues? Was it because they weren't whipped into a frenzy about them? I am assuming that in Qld, the LNP's campaign contained a fair dose of negativity about Federal matters?
I am not pretending for a moment that Labor could have retained power in Qld if the electorate voted purely on State issues, but I just wonder if it would have made much difference to the swing. I guess we'll never know.
Fair enough.You would have to have been a resident in Queensland, Eager, to understand all the reasons why we have absolutely had it with the ALP.
I think that is a fairly malicious statement. I'm not sure how anyone could adopt a posturing attitude during that period (except maybe, Abbott).It was all an act and a good one too. It made a good story for the media.
I think that is a fairly malicious statement. I'm not sure how anyone could adopt a posturing attitude during that period (except maybe, Abbott).
I hope you can gain the quality of compassion during your living years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?