- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 13,131
- Reactions
- 19,320
Thanks,sadly the 5% is usually rejected.I guess you would know but this is handy to see those sneaky signals Tools>Bar Replay.
About the general stuff above, I excluded those below 10c (too volatile for me) plus it always made sense to me to use turnover as the ranking. Like you, I used 3% on entry but 5% on exit to place the entry on open.
Will do a proper reply in the coming days, interesting box of ideas there to test, or initiating reflexionGreat post. I'm sure that post helped you sort through a few concerns that you may have had. You may have made some decisions by thinking through your written words.
(1) I'm not sure the 3% is appropriate for smaller priced stocks where one tick may be 3%.
I can't help you with the problem of your broker not accepting orders that they consider too far away from the last close. I use conditional order to catch breakouts and re-entries and the trigger can be much higher than the close. These orders don't go into the market though and create limit orders when triggered.
Have you considered scanning the market and entering (buying) just before the close instead of the open next day? I scan on the 3pm data that I get at 3:20pm. I've got 40 min to scan and make my decisions before the close.
(2) Can't help you with ranking as I'm not a system trader. I use discretion to select the trades from those available.
You can apply a time stop to minimise the erosion of the penny stock bleeders.
AJX = good entry. The only way get the price spike exits is to target them with your trade management. This may or may not earn more profit overall. Your back testing should indicate the best mgt approach for your entries.
If the AB back tests match the trades then your doing your job. Tick.
I've noticed the same thing on many days. The portfolio value is usually higher in the early morning than at the close. Anecdotally I say it seems like 90%. I don't know what it is actually. It's so common that I don't want to know what it is in the morning because i'll be disappointed in the afternoon. I'll check the share prices but don't want to know the summary. LOL
The new Bat looks much better than the old one. Although your comparison periods are short. Compare over a longer period, although you know this.
Guppy. I'm curious as to the underlying tactics you're using in this system. I understand Guppy's work quite well and know his tactics should be a good robust producer. If it's not, that's a concern. There are two aspects to Guppy's trade entry, a setup and an entry trigger (confirmation). Both steps need to be defined for a trade to be valid.
The Duc's volatility entry is similar to my 1stBB entry. I know this produces too many entries. It may work better with a smaller universe based on price or volume traded or market cap or basic FA info. Ideas only.
Sadly, rejection level varies and pre open orders are rejected in the period before the open.
That would be annoying!
I had 5% for buy/sell for ages before I tweaked to 3%/5% but was 10c and above. Never had a rejection.
Talking about Interactive Brokers.
BTW not related but I've a spreadsheet to place multiple orders in a few clicks using exported csv from AB.
IB is pretty good for system trading
Would be interested to know how you do the export/inport Sir Burr.
another bloodbath day, worse day ever for my systems...
Since our exchanges last week, I worked and refined 2 of the systems:
but lost 3% for the day
- DL Guppy with changes which seems to bring consistency and better outcome; overall satisfied on paper
With 75% of its portfolio bought today and restored full size packet, all at a loss at the end of the session, not as bad as it seems; What a great timing.. it was NOT
The other daily I worked on was the Bat
Lost 2% today;
- ,FB still not satisfactory but better
The system which really killed me today was the weekly QFDuc: 5% loss
This champion managed to get 5 of its 20 positions losing more than 9% each, on top of the smaller losses
Probably urgent that QFDuc get reviewed as it has had bad /meh meh performance since mid january
6m in a row of under performance
The only potential positive is that, being a weekly, it will not cast these loses until next week so potentially recovering..I can hope
Other systems were losing but within expected range on a down day
and yes at 11AM: my systems flat, at 3PM -5k and at close nearly doubling the losses
Overall losses of 3% so more than3 times the market;
If I match the market on the good day and do 3 time worse on bad days, no real point ...
When back home, I will carry on the back analysis and see if i can improve QFDuc in priority
for what its worth, my weekly took a massive hit today. I believe most damage was caused by SYD.
Please explain how your weekly system was hit by SYD which has hardly moved this week (-0.8%). I don't believe it. If your "system" bought SYD after the TO news, then that's unwise, but if it did, then the price hasn't dropped much at all. SYD can't have "damaged" your portfolio at all.
My Combo portfolio (half spec and half midcaps) has lost 2% this week while the XAO index has fallen 1.6%. After four up weeks your portfolios should have gained enough to be able to lose a little when the market falls. If your systems haven't gained in those four up weeks then that's your real concern.
We run weekly systems to ignore the daily variations. Our positions sizes are smaller because the SLs are further away on the weekly charts. If you don't position size or use SLs then you spread the downside exposure across many positions.
If you're concerned by the daily variations in P&L then you're using too much risk. Lighten up and enjoy the journey.
absolutely horrendous..XNT down 2% so could never have been great for my systemshow did you go mate?
It's friday so I'm doing a check, and I'm finding almost all of my open profits gone (all but a few hundred $). Can't always be a win, but this seemed to be particularly brutal in my case. Hope you held up better than myself!
So tomorrow will see new versions starting for weekly ,moa FB and small tweak only guppy.a quick check on the weekly changes and yes we would have been better off with the new versions..not surprised but good check;
I also had an idea I worked on last night: I have 2 daily based on different strategies, what about a Mother Of All amalgamation of both?
It goes against the simplicity is best mantra but why not try:
the results: MOA FB better than FB, doubling performance on long term with similar drawdawn, and a different equity graph, a better one but it is subjective
DL Guppy is still better but I want to spread risk/behaviour so planning to switch from pure FB to MOA FB;
FB code still in , but supercharged with Guppy subsets, not all kept...
These would have increase the profit buffer and so would have kept a profit for this financial year ...
time will tell
Yes weekly and daily, but the losses were bigger than the win ultimately.Hi Frog, are you trading and daily momentum systems? There have been some real flyers in last month (eg Lithium stks etc) - have your systems caught any of these shorter term big moves?
cheers
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?