- Joined
- 16 February 2008
- Posts
- 2,906
- Reactions
- 2
I would be guessing Nick is referring to the micro triangle it broke out of yesterday. Not 100% sure though as I haven't read the book.
Most trading is simple and easy. People just make it difficult because they don't understand what makes the money. This pattern certainly has no edge as it runs at about a 40% win rate, has done for years, but it still makes good money.very simple and easy pattern play...
People just make it difficult because they don't understand what makes the money.
A symmetrical triangle it is.
Now take a look at OMH from about a week ago...
Most trading is simple and easy. People just make it difficult because they don't understand what makes the money. This pattern certainly has no edge as it runs at about a 40% win rate, has done for years, but it still makes good money.
Nothing needs to be discarded when you understand "What Makes The money"
Not only that but you can finally discard the search for the silver bullet and become an expert in your CHOSEN analysis.
Ala Motorway as an example.
ombined with support/resistance/floor pivots for stops/exits etc are what I am looking at. Along with an oscillator for a basic idea of overbrought/oversold and a moving average for the basic trend and especially shooting stars and hammers for trend reversals (and add some sentiment indicators, seasonality and F/A into the frey). Once I have this downpat whilst trading equities (except the floor pivots of course), I will look to move onto shorter timeframes into index futures. Either the SPI, e-minis or both. Oh and add gap theory to that, along with basic wave structure. HH, LL and strong/weak trends.
Take a look at PPX.
1. What do you see?
2. What is the trend?
3. How do you know that is the trend?
#3 is not a loaded question. Just tell me exactly what you see when you first look at the chart.
Now, think about the gumph you've written above and instead think about managing the trade so it creates a positive outcome.
I spent a year in all going back through the ASX stocks identifying patterns, and found that the only way to do it was by advancing through the charts one bar at a time...
also that of all the indicators I tried only one gave me a better than even chance of picking the breakout direction...
the dotted line shows a valid pattern and subsequent b/o which proved to be a false break, the triangle developed further and eventually broke downside. Most people looking back at the history would not even see the dotted triangle, only the solid successfulll one.. I thunk..
Cheers
..........Kauri
Which indicator do you use to help you determine the breakout direction?
But that is the great secret and is usually only available to those willing to pay over $5,000.
.
Which indicator do you use to help you determine the breakout direction
The trend leading into the pattern.. sorry it's not more complicated.. a real holy grail should be wrapped in mystery and a touch of alchemy doesn't do any harm..
LOL, true! How did that second flag turn out Kauri?
Cheers
ha ha, excellent call!
There is that experience coming into play!
I will be there one day
but visually when it climbs (or inversley drops ) too much it looks more like a wet sheet hung out to dry as opposed to a flag...
By the way Bulkowskis book in my opinion has little relevance as it is mainly of very long term patterns
I was in Freo today and saw it in the Public Library.. might be the way to check it out before parting with what for me is an overpriced book.
Cheers
...........Kauri
Cool thread guys.
And now for the 64 gazillion dollar question...can this stuff be coded? Of not entirely, at least into a scan. We know that even the little old ASX can be a big universe of stocks to keep abreast of.
Disclaimer: I haven't read the book.
ASX.G
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?