- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,856
- Reactions
- 24,906
It is the old supply and demand, if all the buyers walked away, there would be some distressed sellers and prices would fall. Then the bank's would be asking for more collateral, which would mean more distressed sellers and so on.It's funny like that. If you find the right places you can get stuff manufactured for half the price of what it is out of Sydney. Yet the installers are often twice the price and slap it up. Rents and homes are ridiculously priced and I just don't see them coming down much inner-city (unless it's a condemned block of units).
I will open a reward account with the bank offers most. That will fetch better cash rate and easy availability. The only conditions are some regular cash inflow monthly (even $5 will do) and the month you draw, do not get the bonus rate. But consider you get filtered through getting nothing on normal accounts and have cash to blast when you need.I don’t feel like a King with what Westpac are giving me for mine
My apology tech/a asked the price. After you gave it..missed posts.. thanks for your openness
I come from a time where purchase at $xyz thousand would translate to $xyz a week rent.
Is that not true anymore?
I will open a reward account with the bank offers most. That will fetch better cash rate and easy availability. The only conditions are some regular cash inflow monthly (even $5 will do) and the month you draw, do not get the bonus rate. But consider you get filtered through getting nothing on normal accounts and have cash to blast when you need.
@aus_traderEven with bonus interest added, the rate you get is very low as an annual %. Can't complain I guess since the official (RBA) interest rate is near zero. Let's say you can squeeze out 1.5% with all the bells and whistles added to today's highest paying interest savings account, it still takes 47 years to double your money in such an environment (see below). There'll be trees growing on my grave in another 47 years.
View attachment 96284
@aus_trader
100% agreed on your point regarding 47 years to be double.
I was responding to a situation when cash money is to be parked temporarily in a volatile market for short term as a risk mitigation exercise than not getting anything out of cash.
I will be real optimisticto have a game plan to double my money in 47 years
Contracted by me at $465K + Stamp Duty
Interest only say 3.5% Approx $330 a week.
Yes Miner, we do have to have a game plan and gone are the good ol' days of doubling your money safely in cash every 14 years at a reasonable rate of 5%.
View attachment 96297
What a difference, 47 years at current interest rates compared with just 14 years in our younger days (or our parent's retirement days).
That's the scenario at ~5%, a lot of retirees planned for in terms of protecting and growing their money as well as drawing an income from their nest egg in their golden years.
It's a whole new ball game now, with interest rates at the lowest levels since mankind has invented lending. We have to diversify our investing into areas like cash, shares, gold, bonds and even real estate if prices become affordable again. So don't feel bad, we have to roll with the punches and find ways to survive and prosper in this new era.
That's the irony.To explain how bad it is for older people these days, my MIL recently asked me how to buy $100k of CBA, to put that in context I couldn't get her to buy $100k of CBA in 1994.
When they were $10.
Now she is scared how fast her savings are going down and she is 80+ years old.
Yes she has had the money in term deposit for 20 years, since the FIL passed away, she is only talking about it ATM. If she gets serious, I will suggest possibly AFI, or ARG something like that.That's the irony.
I can't give any fin. advice but perhaps ask your Mother-In-Law to consider spreading the risk rather than buying just one company. I know as we get older we are hungry for yield and shares can offer a very much attractive yield than cash at the moment. But at least ask her to kindly consider spreading that money across multiple stocks in multiple sectors to mitigate the risk of one company taking a huge dive and wiping most of her life savings.
Yes this is an environment that retirees can get sucked into high risk assets by financial advisors and fund managers with the yield carrot on the end of the stocks.Yes she has had the money in term deposit for 20 years, since the FIL passed away, she is only talking about it ATM. If she gets serious, I will suggest possibly AFI, or ARG something like that.
But it just shows, how easy it would be to prey on older people, in low interest times like these.
Land 700 square meters say $250k bargain at $200k there is land available in the same few streets.
Building single story 350 square meters low end $1500/ square meter
But say bargain built $1200 a square meter so $420k
Bargain total $620k but likely high $600ks
That doesn’t include landscaping/driveways enclosed garage in the rear.
I paid $470K last sale was $520k
This was pretty interesting, I wanted to run the numbers, can you help me understand?
It seems stamp duty on this property would be $19,580.
So you fork out $19,580 and take out an interest only loan for $470,000 at 3.5%, costing ~$315 a week in interest payments and rent it out for $400 a week?
Then tack on some expenses like $1500 a year in council rates, and $400 a year of land tax, not to mention any maintenance or anything else you might spend on the property?
Is that about right?
So it's not really an "investment" in the sense of returning a meaningful yield or providing a surplus to you, you just lever up with an IO loan from the bank and hope to sell it off down the road for a profit?
Yes this is an environment that retirees can get sucked into high risk assets by financial advisors and fund managers with the yield carrot on the end of the stocks.
Those diversified listed funds you mentioned are much better at spreading the risk than buying into a single share. They also offer a good dividend yield way above cash rates at the moment.
The LIC market has rapidly doubled to $45 billion since 2014, when the Coalition government watered down Labor’s Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) laws to allow advisers and brokers to resume receiving commissions for selling listed securities.
FOFA was intended to end conflicted remuneration for financial advisers, but some advisers are receiving commissions of up to 3 per cent to sell LICs and LITs to mum and dad investors.
The low-interest rate environment has enticed some investors to chase higher yielding and riskier investments, while they are also seeking to diversify beyond domestic shares.
LICs in recent years have become more exotic beyond traditional listed shares to include hedge funds, private equity, direct loans and junk bonds.
This is an issue with some stockbrokers and advisers.....a loophole where they can still be paid upfront commission on investment recommendation.
https://www.afr.com/personal-financ...ushed-into-risky-listed-funds-20190710-p525x6
Some folk need an advisors opinion as they simply don't trust their own opinion / or lack knowledge. Some advisors are very convincing seem trustworthy and sell you up. Unfortunately along with them are the scammers.It is crazy, when you can buy LIC's on the market, why the hell would anyone pay an adviser to buy them?
Also there is plenty of low cost, low risk, well established mature LIC's around, like AFI, ARGO and Milton.
back when he first became pm, on a few forums, tony abbott was prescribed the nickname "bony rabbit" which i did find humorous, and subsequently shortened it myself to bony rabs ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?