michael_selway
Coal & Phosphate, thats it!
- Joined
- 20 October 2005
- Posts
- 2,397
- Reactions
- 2
visual said:And now watch as mac.reaches 60 dollars on the back of this news :swear:
bug said:It could be argued MBL offers the greatest opportunity as it embarks on its next stage of development - the bank has been significantly bulking up its international staff, earnings and deals the last two reporting seasons, which will continue to be the case in subsequent periods.
Compared to the smaller players - BNB, RCD and MFS - who do similar activities on a more specialised scale, MBL has been able to diversify itself strongly in a commanding breadth of activities/products,
as well as increasingly expanding where it does business around the globe. MBL's exposure to market downturns should be mitigated as it gains this access to the greater range of deals and opportunites world-wide.
This should represent the next watershed of growth, as MBL's international income moves beyond its current 50% level. The previous growth came from large infrastructure deals in Australia, which have lost prominence in MBL's growth profile.
All of MBL's seven key divisions are firing. Offshore earnings also rose 59 per cent in the result just announced. The bank's long term growth seems assured as it builds on already strong foundations.
bug said:It could be hard to say who the actual EPS winner will be, based on which company gets the most deals and whether their markets go sour at all.
The smaller companies are coming off a numerically smaller growth base, while MBL is building more international scale to take advantage of bigger deals to boost its EPS. MBL should have the ability to do even more of what its smaller rival BNB is doing:
BNB announced its latest earnings upgrade on Friday, after clinching its sizeable eircom takeover and socking away the related fees from the transaction.
BNB has started making noises about Australian investors not supporting its infrastructure fund (BBI), and that it will be setting up more international specialist funds and conducting its own capital raising. Does the strategy sound familiar? MBL has got a head start on the types of big international deals needed to boost EPS growth meaningfully. MBL itself has good scope to grow internationally, to reach the heights of the very large overseas investment banking firms.
MBL is a more mature operation, and should provide a bit more 'safety' when markets turn down. BNB, for instance, is proving more volatile, causing the sharper paring back of its price gains whenever the market adjusts. When the investment banking markets eventually become less friendly to growth, this will challenge the ability of the smaller, less well-established players to produce strong EPS growth.
26 May 2006
Babcock & Brown Upgrade to 2006 EPS Growth Outlook
International investment and advisory firm Babcock & Brown (ASX: BNB) today announced that the 2006 interim result, to be released to the market on 24 August, is expected to report EPS growth in the order of 40%. Assuming interest in the investment opportunities presented by our specialised funds and asset management platform continues and there are no major market disruptions, we expect the strong momentum in the business at the present time to flow through to EPS growth of at least 35% for the full year. This revised full year guidance reflects an increase on the 20% EPS growth previously announced.
bug said:BNB seems to have the jump on MBL at the moment in any event. Since reaching its all time high of $78 on 30 September 2005, MBL has been up and down a lot in the $60's range. It wasn't helped by providing guidance its full year profit would just be 'slightly up', and the +13% result was announced during a trading halt!
While MBL has been on the backfoot, BNB has been issuing upgrades and creating higher EPS expectations! It's up to MBL to prove its international expansion strategy can accelerate it to the next level.
bug said:BNB's PER is 24 vs MBL's 16. That's a pretty big gap.
The conventional wisdom was that both companies would have similar PERs, as BNB's increased growth prospects would be offset by its greater balance sheet risk.
Date: 9/6/2006
Author: Robert Clow
Source: The Australian --- Page: 26
The share price of Australian financial companies fell on 8 June 2006 while a merger sustained Record Investments. Macquarie Bank and Babcock & Brown have some dependence on a strong stock market to resell their assets. This caused Macquarie's share price to fall by $A2.80 to $A62.80, while Babcock's dropped by $A0.42 to $A19.89 in the weaker overall market. On 9 June, the shareholders of Record Investments will vote on its $A3 billion merger with Allco Finance. Allco is more dependent on global economic growth. Record's share price rose by $A0.03 to $A10.73
bug said:Huntley's is currently quoting PEs of 22 (BNB) versus 16.72 (MBL), taking forward earnings into account. The gap stands (but a bit less!)
QUOTE]
Thats only fwd 2006 EPS, u need to look at aleast 3 yrs forward EPS, maybe more.
MBL - Earnings and Dividends Forecast (cents per share)
2006 2007 2008 2009
EPS 382.3 440.2 471.2 473.5
DPS 215.0 250.0 267.5 281.0
EPS(c) PE Growth
Year Ending 30-03-07 440.2 15.0 15.1%
Year Ending 30-03-08 471.2 14.0 7.0%
BNB - Earnings and Dividends Forecast (cents per share)
2005 2006 2007 2008
EPS 77.0 105.3 127.9 152.2
DPS 23.0 32.0 39.1 47.9
EPS(c) PE Growth
Year Ending 30-12-06 105.3 18.8 36.8%
Year Ending 30-12-07 127.9 15.5 21.5%
So
MBL 2009 Fwd PE = 66/4.735 = 13.94
BNB 2008 Fwd PE = 19.81/1.522 = 13.02
So BNB appears cheaper as time goes by, but what about 2010 2011 EPS? It appears MBL is "slowing" % wise in growth pa as currently forecasted? Also BNB recently had an EPS upgrade from 20%pa to now 36.8% this yr, so there may be more suprises to come in the future? What about MBL?
thx
MS
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?