I like how we have drawn paedophilia and a purple flying unicorn PLUS my very low IQ into this deabte.
Bwahahah aha ahha ha ha aha h ah (insert maniacal laugh here)
Hey sunder ... read my post on "hard wired behavioural patterns for mammals" it might help you somewhat.
Just wait until we hit Godwin's law... Oh wait, never mind. Nazis were on page 2, weren't they?
Link for the mammal thing?
If it says what I think it's going to say, then of course animals also have behaviours we determine as good. We don't even get off the first page of the bible, before we encounter:
God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
You see the world through the eyes of an atheist, who assumes everything is morally neutral until it becomes a survival trait, and then it is "Good" because it helps mammals and humans survive. This then helps you say that "See, even mammals have good behaviour, it's a survival trait".
I see the world through the bible's eyes, which says everything is good, except that which has been corrupted by sin. We can look at the same outcome, and attribute it to a very different source.
The problem with this line of argument is that it will never succeed - you can say "Look, evolution put this into us, it's not design", I can say "Look, God designed it into us, it wasn't an accident". You can see a pile of twigs in a river, and call it detrius, I can see a pile of twigs in a river and call it a beaver dam. The only problem is, neither you nor I have other Gods to compare against to see whether this pile of twigs, or this ball of dirt, was built by accident, or by design.
That said, an evolutionist should wonder why a tasty, slow moving, slow breeding, defenseless animal like a sheep still exists. I can only attribute it to the fact that God has a personal liking for lamb. Used in early Jewish sacrifices, and lots of lamb analogies in the new testament.