Sorry but I'm not completely convinced it's as bad as you say. Sure (just the) cash component at $20Mill seems small, but if so, why aren't competing bids coming in?
This is a non-core asset, containing non-core materials, in tantalum, niobium and phosphates, which Lynas isn't targeting, and even if it was, they say would cost $1Billion to develop. How Forge, on the back of a $30Mill capital raising, are going to manage it -who knows.
But, in the absence of a better offer for the Crown polymetallic deposit and Swan phosphate deposit, there is no opportunity cost to Lynas here.
Read the independent experts report by Grant Samuel before jumping to conclusions. There are safeguards, such as the rights to independently prospect; retained rights to the REEs; downstream royalties; rare earth feedstock supply for the Malaysian LAMP; also the right to cancel if Forge don't proceed within 5 years.
Would this deal have happened without the links to Forge of LYC Directors Nicholas Curtis and Jacob Klein? Probably not. Will Mr Curtis benefit personally? Yes in a big way. Does this make it a bad deal for Lynas? Can't see it in the near to medium term, the whole thing has been negotiated at arms length.
It's all a bit tawdry, yes, and a flea speck in Lynas' overall budget, but that's not necessarily a reason to oppose it.
Firstly there are no other bids talked about because the company has never pit the lease on the market. However there is at least one other bid that I know about that would be much better than the one being decided now. The company don't want to recognise it.
Secondly it is NOT a non core asset it has high levels of heavy rare earths that Lynas needs and will be buying back from Forge at "market prices".
The rare earths value on estimates at the quantities previously stated as available and at todays prices are valued at $78 billion dollars according to figures I have seen today. The tantalum is valued at $4.525 billion and the Niobium at $50.423 billion Then there is titanium, zirconium and phosphate. This is for the Crown deposit alone and then there is the Swan deposit for which I have no figures.
All that for a measley $20 million. No wonder Curtis will get bonus shares to the value of over $20 million for "bringing a commercial resource" to Forge.
That IS something to be worried about. This is our CEO feathering his own nest at the expense of Lynas shareholders. Vote NO it is important for anyone who has any financial interest in Lynas.
"..The Sublease Deposits do not form part of Lynas' Rare Earth resource inventory. As the objective of Lynas is to create a reliable, fully integrated source of Rare Earth from mine to market, Lynas regards the Sublease Deposits as non-core assets because they do not fit within Lynas' strategic vision or strategy. It is therefore unlikely that the funds and other resources that would be required for Lynas to develop the Sublease Deposits will be allocated for that purpose and accordingly, the Independent Board Committee believes that, in the absence of the transaction, it is unlikely that any shareholder value will be realized directly from the Sublease Depoits in the medium term.."
.
Interesting article on this subject here: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...lict-of-interest/story-e6frg8zx-1226038738532
A no for now is a must on this basis imo
Interesting article on this subject here: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...lict-of-interest/story-e6frg8zx-1226038738532
A no for now is a must on this basis imo
If I wish to vote no via proxy, can I just list the Chairmen of the meeting but specify my vote as no? Or do I need to nominate the shareholders association.?
You can. However if you give the Shareholders Assn you proxy it will give them more No votes to claim and help them present a bigger no vote. You dont need to be an association member.
OK, I will go with them. Do I need to do anything special in advance with them, or just list them on the form?
I did this also. Reading the proxy form, it says the Chairman intends to vote in the affirmative on all the motions (in the absence of other direction), so I thought safer to assign proxy to the ASA and mail it to them.I listed them on the form then posted the form to the Australian Shareholders Assn. I wanted to be SURE they got it. Their address:
Level 7 North Tower
1-5 Railway Street
Chatswood
NSW 2067.
I did this also. Reading the proxy form, it says the Chairman intends to vote in the affirmative on all the motions (in the absence of other direction), so I thought safer to assign proxy to the ASA and mail it to them.
yep SP took a good hit today.. what do you think of the effects for long term nioka?
would of been a good chance to take profit and get back in early next week?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?