JohnDe
La dolce vita
- Joined
- 11 March 2020
- Posts
- 4,291
- Reactions
- 6,352
It doesn't matter what it truly is or isn't. The myth around lithium (whether you believe it or not) is that it is necessary for the green revolution, which virtually all Western governments have subscribed to and legislated targets for.
Good afternoonGood afternoon
Bell Potter lifting near-term lithium pricing outlook:
Traded LTR yesterday Edit ... silly me Friday..
Holding CXO hopefully not for much longer.
Kind regards
rcw1
GS are self serving.I still don't know whether to believe the bears such as Goldman or the likes of Benchmark Minerals Intelligence who have produced two very different looking supply/demand graphs this year.
Having read all the news of the lithium stock pullback yesterday, I still don't know whether to believe the bears such as Goldman or the likes of Benchmark Minerals Intelligence who have produced two very different looking supply/demand graphs this year. I'm not sure which of these has an agenda, or who their analysts are, to be able to make a judgement either way. I'm vexed. And in that case, I thinking I'm better off just trading the charts of this sector for the time being.
I think there's too much unpredictability to be able to forecast prices that far out, namely:
- Will China head into recession?
- How many other EV manufacturers are coming online?
- What happens if there's a commodity East-West divide?
Lithium players must be hurting today.
I found an interesting article suggesting China will set up a single purchaser for Lithium similar to what they've done with iron ore (although still ended up paying higher prices).
China may extend state iron ore buying strategy to lithium
If successful in iron ore, the mandate of China's new centralised state buyer could be extended to lithium, copper and bauxite.www.mining.com
Short term is going to be volatile, with an increasing risk of recession it's hard to see EV purchases climbing rapidly.
All eyes on China
Lithium players must be hurting today.
I found an interesting article suggesting China will set up a single purchaser for Lithium similar to what they've done with iron ore (although still ended up paying higher prices).
China may extend state iron ore buying strategy to lithium
If successful in iron ore, the mandate of China's new centralised state buyer could be extended to lithium, copper and bauxite.www.mining.com
Short term is going to be volatile, with an increasing risk of recession it's hard to see EV purchases climbing rapidly.
All eyes on China
If you don't see EV purchases climbing rapidly, is that because you think people will stop buying cars entirely or because you think they'll revert to buying ICE vehicles?
EVs are still a small percentage of all new vehicle sales. Even if there is a drastic reduction in new vehicle sales (probably unlikely even in the event of a nasty recession), presumably the reduction in sales will primarily be from the ICE part of the market, not the EV side, which will continue to grow since it is still so small, and clearly everyone wants an EV.
I don't know.
I think the equation was clearer when oil prices were at recent highs, but now oil is hitting pre-Ukraine war lows, and expected to fall further.
Coupled with a gloomy economy, would you buy a new electric car or would you buy a second hand ICE or maybe not buy anything at all?
I guess we should investigate what EV manufacturer sales have been like...
When buying a new car (a new car buyer typically does not have the same mindset as someone buying a second hand car) people are thinking ahead further than the current petrol price.
People buying new vehicles aren't scratching around for loose change, living hand to mouth. Buying a new car is a choice to spend more money than you need to.
Currently, the percentage of total new vehicles which are EVs is still very low. Demand far exceeds supply.
We have seen an interesting situation over the last two or three years with car manufacturing slowing down due to ridiculous lockdowns etc. The price of second hand vehicles has increased due to a lack of total vehicle supply. This will inevitably push demand for new vehicles up. It's still more cost effective to buy second hand, but more people will be keen to buy new when the price difference is more narrow.
Ask almost anyone if they would prefer an EV or a petrol vehicle. We all know what the majority will say.
Keep in mind that it is the people buying new vehicles (the ones with the most money) who determine what the people who buy second hand vehicles will have to choose from a few years down the track.
I can't see how the number of new EV sales could not continue increasing rapidly for the next few years, short of all out catastrophe well beyond what most currently-living people have seen in their lifetimes (probably not as unlikely as many of us would like to think, but in that scenario you probably want to be investing in canned food, guns, ammo and survival courses).
I don't think that's right - every purchase is a cost-benefit equation. A small difference in price matters when other expenses exist, namely mortgages, and I think that consumers factor this in when deciding between EVs and ICEs, particularly when he price of second hand vehicles (and fuel) is now falling.
Having said that, I do think long-term demand will increase. Governments have legislated a baseline level of demand. There is a global trend towards electrification. There is a Western trend to renewable energies which will require a storage solution too.
I think there is also going to be demand for mines from car companies (see Musk's comments)
The difficulty is what happens in the short term, which I think will be dictated by consumer trends, China and the overall economy....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?