- Joined
- 12 September 2004
- Posts
- 1,714
- Reactions
- 1
Totally agree, although the information is there for those who dig.I totally believe in the policy positions of government rather than the individual. Unfortunately the way the media is these days it is more about the personality of the leader than what they are actually espousing.
Gillard is the only thing remotely successful in the labour party (strangely, she was the one I was most suspicious of before the last election) and is given a fair reign to speak to the media.Notice how PM Rudd has sidelined Garrett, Wong, Combet, Gillard etc etc to NOT speak to the media.
I would have to see some serious change in his management ability. I wouldn't vote on a 20 year future promise. I would have to see action immediately.
They've all gone into hiding!!!!!!!Where are all the freaks that voted for this trainsmash of a government? "It wasn't me that voted for him" I hear them bleat.
WILL THE PERSON WHO VOTED FOR THIS GOVERNMENT PLEASE STAND UP !
This is the bit that really infuriates me, too. His refrain of "we are taking the tough decisionsto make Australia a better place and to ensure the security of Australian working families, carers and pensioners", uttered in that sanctimonious, pious tone, when what he's doing is selling our future down the gurgler is beyond belief.I mean, by all means, go out there an call yourself a Keynesian who believes in 'big government' and nationalising the private sector. Be honest about it. Just do not go and try and spin all this spending and big taxes as being conservative!!
Sails, I doubt the WSJ would have got this wrong.If the WSJ have reported the above correctly, it is shocking. That's 49 billion down the drain. How can he possibly think he is economically conservative...Maybe he actually believes his own spin...
I'm not sure that's quite fair, TS. I've seen both Wong and Gillard in extensive interviews on ABC TV in the last week. In both cases they were being asked to account for the Dear Leader's actions, putting both of them in a very unpleasant position.Notice how PM Rudd has sidelined Garrett, Wong, Combet, Gillard etc etc to NOT speak to the media.
Standing up!!!!!!!
I helped get rid of Howard. Maybe I'll help get the the libs back but not with "big ears and bike riding budgies". I'll vote for a Turnbull led government.
Did I get called a freak? I just checked in the mirror and I think I looked like a normal Aussie. A little weatherbeaten but that is what happens when you spend many many years attending the school of hard knocks.
Hi Sails,Snake, what about the pattern of exorbitant and apparently compulsive spending with OPM (taxpayer's money) since he has been in government? Maybe that doesn't worry you, but it certainly does worry me.
Three more years is a long time to do an awful lot of damage to our country financially if he can't help himself with these spending sprees. Who then is going to bail us out if we go bankrupt?
WILL THE PERSON WHO VOTED FOR THIS GOVERNMENT PLEASE STAND UP !
I actually live in Howard's old electorate and was happy to play my part in Australia's political history and vote him out.
On the rare occasion that i simply cant in all honesty vote Labor i just vote informal due to our stupid 2 party preferred system.
So you voted out a government that returned Australia to a budget surplus in just one term after Hawke & Keating (in typical Labor fashion) ran up a huge deficit.
You voted out a government that had given us many years of responsible economic management and solid growth and prosperity.
And as their replacement you voted in a rabble consisting mostly of union stooges and a rock star, a mob with limited if any economic credentials or managerial experience, a bunch of irresponsible spendaholics who have thrown money around with reckless abandon and racked up a huge debt in the process, a bunch of fools who have virtually laid out the welcome mat to illegal immigrants, a pack of socialist morons who now want to tax the heart out of the very industries that have given Australia much of its prosperity.
Well done, Nioka - you must feel very pleased with yourself as you watch Rudd stuffing up our country!
I'm still offended. I did an IQ test and got a result of 146. That was a challenge to the cerebellum. That makes me "cerebrally challenged" so I am offended that you relate CC to freaks.
LMAO@nioka .... an IQ of 146 puts you in the same league as Stephen Hawking then? What's the air like up there? Ergo you are a freak! Albeit a very smart one. Most genuis's I know actually have never tried to do an IQ test let alone tell everyone their grade.
todster ... are you trolling again? try this instead www.google.com.au
How is this government physically affecting me? Try some research.
You are, of course, entitled to just focus on yourself. I - and many people I know - are quite comfortable and unaffected in any personal sense by the Rudd government's woeful mismanagement.I tend to worry about things that affect me and try not to take politics terribly seriously,something about getting the government you deserve
They've all gone into hiding!!!!!!!
Hmmm, maybe. Consider me out of the closet, then.
Is Rudd a conservative? Yes. I haven't heard much in the way of strategic defence of the resource super-tax, but it makes perfect (conservative) sense to me to 'conserve' or rather, to maintain as long as possible, our resources which we all own, as citizens not just the mining co. shareholders.
How is it good policy to mine, drill and sell every locatable resource now, this year, this decade? Once upon a time the ocean spawning grounds of the orange ruffy were located, and it took quota imposition to restrain trawlermen from fishing those spawning stocks to near extinction. A communist policy perhaps? And mineral resources don't even breed. They exist. Once. They're mined. Once.
A conservative would slow things down a bit. Our grandchildren may appreciate our restraint; there may be some left in the ground for them to enjoy too.
Resources in the ground aren't going anywhere. The talk of mining wealth leaving the country as a result of the super-tax is absurd a comment as I've ever heard. It may however not reach your or my back account in the volume expected. A bit less. Oh, the horror ...
But strategy is a dirty word. The future is a dirty word. Grandchildren, great-grandchildren, are dirty words.
I voted A.L.P. (in the lower house). Don't like P.M. Rudd, but much prefer to the previous, and to the opposition de jour.
In the senate I voted Green.
The horror, the horror ....
Is Rudd a conservative? Yes.
I'm still offended. I did an IQ test and got a result of 146. That was a challenge to the cerebellum.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?