IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,687
- Reactions
- 4,784
How can this idiot of a Prime Minister of ours justify spending $38,500,000 OF TAX PAYERS MONEY on advertising his propaganda on the RSPT. More lies and spin!
There is little chance of it passing through the Senate, so why waste more money on a bill that may never rise from the table.
That's our Prime Minister. As Malcolm Fraser states,"he is far worse than Gough Whitlam".
He has to be kicked out at the next election. Even our best of friend So_Cynical is starting to see the light. Good onya mate.
Liberal mates milked millions from Howard’s ad bonanza
When it came to the Workchoices advertising campaigns, which cost more than $120m, MCGC ensured the Liberal Party’s closest friends in the advertising industry got in on the action.
Lindsay Tanner and John Faulkner got rid of the MCGC when they got into government and handed control of advertising back to the Department of Finance instead of PM&C.
http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/13/liberal-mates-milked-millions-from-howards-ad-bonanza/
Government advertising cost $254 million in the final year of the Howard government, $86 million in 2008 and $115 million in 2009.
''For 12 long years the Liberal Party abused taxpayer funds in pursuit of advertising campaigns that promoted party political interests,'' Mr Ludwig said. ''Under the Howard government, there was no explicit prevention on the use of campaigns for political purposes, and there was no independent scrutiny of campaigns prior to their launch.''
http://www.watoday.com.au/national/labor-defends-126m-for-ads-20100512-uy4m.html
But John Howard had never railed against government advertising being "a cancer on our democracy". Both sides when in government have always abused taxpayer funds to pay for their own advertising.Liberal mates milked millions from Howard’s ad bonanza
When it came to the Workchoices advertising campaigns, which cost more than $120m, MCGC ensured the Liberal Party’s closest friends in the advertising industry got in on the action.
Lindsay Tanner and John Faulkner got rid of the MCGC when they got into government and handed control of advertising back to the Department of Finance instead of PM&C.
http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/13/liberal-mates-milked-millions-from-howards-ad-bonanza/
Government advertising cost $254 million in the final year of the Howard government, $86 million in 2008 and $115 million in 2009.
''For 12 long years the Liberal Party abused taxpayer funds in pursuit of advertising campaigns that promoted party political interests,'' Mr Ludwig said. ''Under the Howard government, there was no explicit prevention on the use of campaigns for political purposes, and there was no independent scrutiny of campaigns prior to their launch.''
http://www.watoday.com.au/national/labor-defends-126m-for-ads-20100512-uy4m.html
I was thinking about that too, but I suppose they want to influence the electorate into pressuring their local members one way or the other.Why are they wasting all this money on advertising when the bill may not even pass through the senate.
But John Howard had never railed against government advertising being "a cancer on our democracy".
Both sides when in government have always abused taxpayer funds to pay for their own advertising.
It's the utter hypocrisy from Rudd in this instance which has left people open-mouthed in disbelief, especially after he has wasted so many billions.
My guess would be that some of those swinging voters who were disgusted with the government's performance so far, but were still prepared to give them another chance, will have found this advertising ruse one step too far and will switch their vote.
Personally, I find it the most obnoxious thing they have done so far because there isn't even the pretence of the money being spent with the aim of doing anything for the Australian people: it's a purely political move.
I have never held any particular fondness for any mining company, but now simply out of revulsion for the behaviour of the government, I would back the miners 100%.
IFocus, I don't disagree about the need to change the way mining companies are taxed, but the current proposal is unreasonable, not to mention appallingly dumped on the nation without proper consultation.Julia look at the facts not the spin there should be a tax.
Abbotts prescription is that the mining company's should write or decide the tax laws of Australia not Treasury.
Abbott will lock himself into not having tax reform at our expense
A pox on all their houses!
Without reading this thread, and also disclosing that I am Labour inclined,
I dont understand how the govt could possibly have clumsily handled this mining tax proposal.
Without going over the full details of the tax itself, some things seem obvious to me:
* A change in the way the taxes are levied was proposed, costed and thought out in the Henry report etc.
* This should have been a reasonably easy political sell to the public
* Mining companies would oppose
So why not consult and negotiate properly with them first, and let the matter sink in, instead of dropping a bucket of poo?
The only sensible reason I can think of, is someone must have concluded that a period of uncertainty would not be good.
But now they have bought that about in spades, the mining coys will muster an almighty campaign against the govt, and they look completely politically inept.
It seems concessions will need to be made
Hard to imagine ways it could have been more poorly managed
$38.5 MILLION is correct. How many hospital beds would that amount of money have purchased?
The way this idiot is going about things ATM, you would begin to wonder if he really wants to win the next election. Maybe, just maybe, the next three years may too much for him to handle. Let someone else clean up the mess.
That's our Prime Minister!!!!!!!
Yes
I will probably vote greens this year in the senate
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...ive-book-extract/story-e6freuzi-1225873206625
A good insight into the character of Our Dear Leader (Julia's term for Rudd has stuck with me)
Yep agree also Clive Palmer is a NLP member and financial supporter of the Libs and Nats is leading the charge so the politics is pretty grubby from the mining side no win for Labor
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?