approximately 5% of the time you actually have a point, is probably missed
Like I said, am in no way au fait on this.
So... If we took some sodium hydroxide with a ph of 14 and added just enough sodium carbonate, itself a base, to raise the solution to 13, are we to describe that process as acidification? Even though no acidic substances at all were added?
Likewise if we have some hydrochloric acid to which we add some acetic acid to increase the ph, are we said to be alkalizing (basifying?) that solution?
I think my insult was better. No prize for second go, mateGood,
Always refreshing to see your lack of education/intelligence on display.
Even admitting it more amusing !!
Not strictly true.At the extremes of scale you put up the discussion would be about the fall / rise / change in pH and makes no difference whats added.
I have Red blocked, not interested in what it has to say.At the extremes of scale you put up the discussion would be about the fall / rise / change in pH and makes no difference whats added.
As the ocean pH is 8 ish next to 7 neutral and moving lower for a general population explanation alkaline / acid to me would be used in the description.
In my day to day work with process / chemical engineers / chemists some with PhD's also dealing with the various government departments that did the regulatory audits etc this would be normal.
Rederobs exact explanation is what you would use if you were siting exams or writing a research paper.
If you want to claim its propaganda go for it.
Nice distraction from the fact its happening, causes are well understood (basic science no models required) not aware of any fossil fuels money backing distention and no plans to stop.
Like I keep saying its end game, CC is SFA in comparison and alarmingly its not that far to cross the line of no return.
Always refreshing to see your lack of education/intelligence on display.
I have Red blocked, not interested in what it has to say.
And again ...
The average schmuck believes the oceans have become acidic, via the acidification terminology. This is not the case.
I did think PH falling was becoming more acidic. Not in your case ... apparently.
I am falling off my seat ...
Technically, pH lowering while still being alkaline isn't becoming more acidic
I disagree with you there.Shame .....you are in a echo chamber then Red is one of the more astute and accurate posters here at least he must be I agree with his premise almost entirely
What is it becoming if NOT closer to the acidic end of the scale ?
dazzle us ?
Can a crab form a shell at a PH level below 7 ?
In say 2150 ? even at a mildly acidic state ... Coke at PH of 4 ... overnight takes away the top layers of a penny ... overnight. How about living in yes milder PH levels but ALL the time ??
Can a crab form a shell at a PH level below 7 ?
You, bas, kahuna, and all the other commies here are not.
When he really means that whenever asked for evidence for his claims, he can't offer it. As these very claims he makes are also without evidence... unless he claims his opinions as facts....it is because of the excessive and unreasonable ad hominem and unreasonable debating style.
Most people are not good at science.He does have a bit of a point, the public is being lead to believe the ocean is acidic (most people probably assume it was/should be neutral).
I disagree with you there.
I hate to split hairs again, but an echo chamber does not admit any contrary thought. I have him blocked, not because I think his intellectual points are unreasonable (even if I think some of them are wrong), it is because of the excessive and unreasonable ad hominem and unreasonable debating style.
I would point out that Komrade Red is the only one blocked. You, bas, kahuna, and all the other commies here are not.
That is not an echo chamber.
Now I am communist !! Brilliant.
Except that this may not be true.Less alkaline.
That would be difficult. You do not understand chemistry.My intention is to understand, but also understanding for people not up on the vagaries of ph.
You could, of course, offer evidence for this claim.This is similar to the extreme weather narrative , which (at this point) a load of old cobblers.
I have to say Redor.. was one of the person i ignore the fastest.I disagree with you there.
I hate to split hairs again, but an echo chamber does not admit any contrary thought. I have him blocked, not because I think his intellectual points are unreasonable (even if I think some of them are wrong), it is because of the excessive and unreasonable ad hominem and unreasonable debating style.
I would point out that Komrade Red is the only one blocked. You, bas, kahuna, and all the other commies here are not.
That is not an echo chamber.
Or you are a muppet who may one day learn to think by yourself?Mark the scale for this is any one who criticises Trump or is politically left of Genghis Khan or has a social conscience is a commie........wear it with prideyou are normal.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?