Knobby22
Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast
- Joined
- 13 October 2004
- Posts
- 9,946
- Reactions
- 7,035
Climate change poses grave threat to security, says UK envoy
Rear Admiral Neil Morisetti, special representative to foreign secretary, says governments can't afford to wait for 100% certainty
Climate change poses as grave a threat to the UK's security and economic resilience as terrorism and cyber-attacks, according to a senior military commander who was appointed as William Hague's climate envoy this year.
In his first interview since taking up the post, Rear Admiral Neil Morisetti said climate change was "one of the greatest risks we face in the 21st century", particularly because it presented a global threat. "By virtue of our interdependencies around the world, it will affect all of us," he said.
He argued that climate change was a potent threat multiplier at choke points in the global trade network, such as the Straits of Hormuz, through which much of the world's traded oil and gas is shipped.
Morisetti left a 37-year naval career to become the foreign secretary's special representative for climate change, and represents the growing influence of hard-headed military thinking in the global warming debate.
The link between climate change and global security risks is on the agenda of the UK's presidency of the G8, including a meeting to be chaired by Morissetti in July that will include assessment of hotspots where climate stress is driving migration.
Morisetti's central message was simple and stark: "The areas of greatest global stress and greatest impacts of climate change are broadly coincidental."
He said governments could not afford to wait until they had all the information they might like. "If you wait for 100% certainty on the battlefield, you'll be in a pretty sticky state," he said.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/...h-so-far-in-2013/story-fnii5smq-1226680706158Melbourne has its warmest start to a year ever with above-average temperatures for each month so far in 2013
Tom Minear
Herald Sun
July 17, 2013 12:12PM
ITS official: Melbourne has never had a hotter start to a year.
Maximum temperatures have been above average every month in 2013 and Sky News senior meteorologist Tom Saunders said this was a historic streak of warm weather.
“This is no mean feat considering weather data exists for Melbourne back to the 1850s,” Mr Saunders said.
Melbourne’s average temperature has been 22.5 degrees so far this year, significantly above the long-term January to July average of 20 degrees.
Bureau of Meteorology climate meterologist Dr Harvey Stern confirmed the record, which he said exceeded an average temperature of 22.3 degrees for the first half of 2007.
There has been no cold comfort in winter either, with every day in July seeing a maximum temperature higher than the long-term July average of 13.5 degrees.
Melbourne even reached a balmy top of 19.5 degrees on Monday afternoon, six degrees higher than normal.
But this month’s hot streak could come to an end on Saturday with a cold front expected to see the mercury drop to a chilly 11 degrees.
Mr Saunders said the record for Melbourne’s hottest year had been routinely threatened throughout the last decade.
“The unprecedented heat is due to abnormally warm ocean temperatures surrounding Australia which is partly the result of global warming,” Mr Saunders said.
Ice-free Arctic in two years heralds methane catastrophe – scientist
Professor Peter Wadhams, co-author of new Nature paper on costs of Arctic warming, explains the danger of inaction
A new paper in the journal Nature argues that the release of a 50 Gigatonne (Gt) methane pulse from thawing Arctic permafrost could destabilise the climate system and trigger costs as high as the value of the entire world's GDP. The East Siberian Arctic Shelf's (ESAS) reservoir of methane gas hydrates could be released slowly over 50 years or "catastrophically fast" in a matter of decades – if not even one decade – the researchers said.
Not everyone agrees that the paper's scenario of a catastrophic and imminent methane release is plausible. Nasa's Gavin Schmidt has previously argued that the danger of such a methane release is low, whereas scientists like Prof Tim Lenton from Exeter University who specialises in climate tipping points, says the process would take thousands if not tens of thousands of years, let alone a decade.
But do most models underestimate the problem? A new paper in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) projects that the Arctic will be ice free in September by around 2054-58. This, however, departs significantly from empirical observations of the rapid loss of Arctic summer sea ice which is heading for disappearance within two or three years according to Nature co-author and renowned Arctic expert Prof Peter Wadhams, head of the Polar ocean physics group at Cambridge University.
When was the article released? I can't see a date.
That is the worse case scenario, most scientists think it won't happen that quickly, unfortunately they have been too conservative before. If it gets released in one decade - look out world.
... But hey .. who really wants to be told we are on the edge of a irrevocable catastrophe ?
It did happen in the past. ...
But hey .. who really wants to be told we are on the edge of a irrevocable catastrophe ?
Antibiotic-resistant superbugs are now being found in food and, in some countries, drinking water, while doctors are warning that we're approaching the time when even the most toxic of antibiotics won't be able to kill some bugs.
Methane clathrates and climate change
Main article: Clathrate gun hypothesis
Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas. Despite its short atmospheric half life of 7 years, methane has a global warming potential of 62 over 20 years and 21 over 100 years (IPCC, 1996; Berner and Berner, 1996; vanLoon and Duffy, 2000). The sudden release of large amounts of natural gas from methane clathrate deposits has been hypothesized as a cause of past and possibly future climate changes. Events possibly linked in this way are the Permian-Triassic extinction event and the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methane_clathrate
https://sites.google.com/site/thepaleoceneeocenethermalmaxim/
Well it happened alright. Global Temperatures shot up and there were mass extinctions of life . But of course after a couple of millon years things settled down and new species evolved.
Im afraid your irrevocable catastrophe will be made redundant by the SUPERBUG.
Not Bold...but your ABC and even your favourite newspaper The Guardian
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2013/s3810324.htm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/mar/11/superbugs-antibiotics-bacterial-diseases-infections
But wouldn't be the best way of achieving a CO2 reduction would it ?
Well actually the "silver lining" in this possible human catastrophe is that the decimation of billions of people could help reverse global warming.
This seems to have occurred in Medieval Europe after the Black Death reduced the population by a third. Whole regions ended up as forests again because of the wiping out of many rural populations. This seemed to be part of a change in climate that pulled CO2 from the atmosphere and reduce temperatures.
http://www.eh-resources.org/timeline/timeline_me.html
I almost choked on my Chocolate Truffle, I laughed so hard at this.
Seriously this is the funniest quote I have ever read on ASF.
I sincerely thank you for this, can I have permission to use it?
MW
It's interesting to observe the reactions of some posters to my comments about what happened to the climate as a result of the Black Death.
The mass return of forests in many parts of Europe did result in a reduction of CO2 and was part of the reason for the downturn in temperatures. I thought there were enough clues in my comments to make it clear I didn't think that mass human deaths was any way to reverse global warming but ... apparently not.
Go read about the Anasazi Indians and how they turned a fertile landscape into a huge dessert
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?